I never presented the code as my own - the updates I did are my own.
You're lying again!
Here are just a few examples where you have stated that you believe you are allowed to claim the code as your own:
I'm allowed to change the code that is public and brand it as my own given the enough code was changed.
I plan to market it as my own since it is my own. Given enough code is changed Im allowed to call it my own.
Im sorry but our discussion has no point as you keep coming back to the same point where you claim "i scammed because I claimed i made the code" while in fact I never claimed that and if you joined my discord and did some actual research you'd realise that.
Give my earlier messages another read; I don't plan on rephrasing it just because it didn't click the first time. And, by the way, I'm not interested in your discord.
Also please let me know: How do I prove something doesnt exist? Logically and mathematically.
I didn't ask you to prove something that doesn't exist. I asked you to prove your statements,
specifically this:
It's not so black and white as people here make it seem. Phoenix gambling is a scamming group of people who stole the "code" and now is pretending they made it.
Original developers published their 1st version of the code long time ago and gave permission to anyone to change it, modify it and resell it.
and this:
Please note that Phoenix gambling is still selling the code full of bugs (over 100 of them) and they refuse to fix any - because they think its not necessary or because they cant? you decide.
If you can't back up your claims with solid evidence, it basically means you're making things up to spin a fake story.
You also inverted/twisted half of what I said about Klaus and Adam. All i said was: let them come here and show they made the code.
You're making things up again. I didn't mention anything about those two. I clearly stated that it's not relevant to this discussion.
You're very fast to accuse someone of lying, a true sign of an intellectual.
Let me paint you a picture here since you maybe don't understand the written word:
If i find a broken car in the middle of the road, all rusty and dusty and I take it home and fix it and then try to sell it ->
IS THAT CAR MINE OR SOMEONE ELSES?If i find an abandoned dog in a cardboard box and I take it home and it grows old with me ->
IS THAT MY DOG OR SOMEONE ELSES?If you're not interested in joining my discord to read what I wrote there then why should I go the extra mile to prove anything to you?
Whatever I write here won't be enough for you as you're clearly taking part in this discussion for some personal agenda.
I'm not going to go and dig through forums to find the original dev's post where he shared the code - thus I asked real "phoenix gambling" (not you, dont worry, you don't have to do anything) to prove they're the person in question (aka. original dev) - if they can prove that then I'll respect their wish and stop updating and selling the source code.
This all boils down to this: Bunch of people on this forum think they're competent to play the judge roles whilst the "phoenix gambling" doesn't have to prove anything to anyone.
Why is it that they can simply come here, leave one comment and suddenly they're marked as the sole owners and developers of the code in question?
Why is it that I have to keep jumping through hoops to prove that I'm in fact allowed to sell what I sell?
And lastly, if im not allowed to sell what i sell will the original owner please come here, present the proof of ownership and then inform me that I'm not allowed to do what i do?
Until that happens your comments won't hold any value and we both know that. You nor any other person on this forum can play the role of a judge and say this is right that is not right.
Why you ask? Because you're not informed enough - and you refuse to inform yourself on the matter - all you care is leaving a comment here, just as its the case with multiple other threads on this forum.
I suggest you go back and read all 3 threads again, spend some of your time googling and then come back and leave a comment that actually makes sense.
Also also, why don't you address the comment on the OP actively lying, trying to scam and manipulate me? How come you're only interested in the vigilantism that relates to my "wrongdoings"?
So, let's make it clear once and for all.
The source code that I used as a base - WAS PUBLISHED ONLINE FOR ALL TO SEE WITHOUT ANY "LICENCES" - I took the source code and fixed it (made it useable).
Unless the REAL OWNER can come here and prove their ownership + forbid me from selling it I will not stop selling it.
If the source code in question WAS in fact owned by "phoenix gambling" it would not be able to stand still on github for over 3 years - phoenix would be able to take it down.
WHY DON'T THEY TAKE IT DOWN THEN???
And if all this is not enough - here's a little trick we'll do.
I will NOT sell the base source code - I will give it out for free.
I will only sell updates for the free source code.
Does that work or am I not even allowed to sell 100% my own code, your Honor?