Topic: FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest - page 1183. (Read 559608 times)

That's not quite right as Bitcoiner11Norbert pointed out. New accounts start off with full base reward to allow them to build a roll history before the formula is applied. Paying customers getting more than free players seems a logical and fair reward to me.

Gamblers earn more than new. That’s the system they have. Nexuses it’s more a casino site than a faucet site.

Why on my account created 1 year ago i receive only 0.00000035 BTC per free roll while my friend that created account yesterday get 0.00000048 BTC per roll? Long term users should earn more than new.

Nope, this is the Multiply BTC bonus on the dice page. Thequin already clarified how this triggers, which was something new for me. So it's sort of like a 1% cashback in reality, but you still have to wager it plus equal locked amount 25x. It's not a big deal at all, and I'm enjoying the extra.

Personal progress, this week is my personal record high for lotto from Multiply. Lost almost 65% of my deposit already but partly because I was impatient, but chance to win lottery is ALMOST 0.05%. I thought weekend bonus would help me but it seems a lot of people wager on weekends, cause my % hasn't been climbing! At least I got all those rewards points though

@thequin, they mean the free btc bonus that comes from the gambling bonus? As in the one listed on the free btc page...

Neither of those things happened. I surely did not meet the x.y% needed to achieving the next bonus. And no I did not lose all my deposit, but thanks for providing the extra feedback.


This is most likely what is happening. Thanks for clarifying. The deposit bonus I was talking about was maybe last year, where you can deposit and you are offered an equal bonus but only after both are locked and wagered 25x. Actually exactly what is happening to me now every few hours. But now I understand that this bonus appears when I wager 1% of it, thanks again now I understand.

Oh and by the way, I lost more than half my deposit trying to reach 0.05% win chance in lotto, so I have a good feeling hehe.

I'm not entirely sure which bonus you are asking about as there is no deposit bonus. If you mean the multiply BTC bonus the maximum bonus is 1% of wagered amount since the last time you activated a bonus. So it doesn't show until you have wagered enough to be eligible.

---

Yes, there was a promo bonus for new users right back at the site launch. Then you needed to use a withdrawal address to sign up the account rather than an email address as now, so that was the account identifier. I don't think it is unsafe to post one of your Bitcoin addresses but it could affect your privacy if you also use that address for other purposes.

---

Yes, he's been spamming the thread continually and giving the moderators a lot of work to do.


That's good advice, the ignore button work very well.

That's also five years ago, not sure you'll get a reply from that user .
There was a promotion of people posting addresses for something when it started (or uids or something).
 

is it not safe? i thought also that information is confidential.

It only triggered if one of these meet:
- You somehow can bet alot and won (balance > 0) for long enough to have this message: "xx.yyyy% achieved towards the next +0.00000zzz BTC bonus!" move past it 0% (wagered/lost level increased).
- You bet alot and lose all & deposit, place a litle bit more bets (to trigger previous rekted amount loss/wagered).

It* won't reward you for deposit only, but it is based on amount wagerd / lost!

He is using these posts to advertise his bots.

He is using this thread, because it is the most viewed thread about this site , so it maximizes his chances to target his ideal audience.

I am not sure if he sells the bots or if he gets income from the views on the video links or if he just gets some personal gratification from this but I could care less.    

He has become a minor annoyance and if it gets out of hand, then I will just click the ignore button and he will be out of my life. For now, I will still read his comments, to see if there are something positive that can be derived from that.  

You know the good thing about this thread is that it is really one of the very few ones that is extremely active even though it really just was a faucet site. I've read all the criticism and it's true to some extent, but most flaws pointed out are really the same flaws at all the casinos I use and deposit money at. I don't keep any funds at exchanges but I keep them at casinos, weird isn't it how our trust is distributed. I trust exchanges with companies less than I do casinos with no way to reach them if anything happens. That's how this whole thing works I guess.

Anyway after BTC went down rather badly, I decided yesterday to deposit a small amount (less than $50 thanks to price wars hehe) and try see where it can get me lottery wise (from multiply). First time I ever reached 0.01% chance! I realized only now the deposit wager bonus seems gone, but it pops up every now and then (with small bonus to claim). Does anyone know how this exactly triggers?

Quite the astute observation.  You are correct that EVERY post I make is very critical of the site but it's only for one reason and one reason alone.  TheQuack decided he needed to enter my thread when I first announced the bot existed and he just started trash talking it,  so,  here I am doing the same to his piss poor service.  I point out EVERY lie he makes as well as when he leaves out important details like any snake will do.  If he wasnt such a fucktard,  I'd have a COMPLETELY different attitude towards the site.  But hes an asshole to not only myself but ANYONE who asks real questions.  Usually he gives snide remarks first then someone comes in after him, answers the question,  then he'll usually mirror the guys response,  as if he wrote it.  He's the worst "customer support" person I've ever seen lmfao.  If it werent for him,  I probably wouldnt even be in this thread at all.  Instead I'd be over here:  https://dlive.tv/btctrading chatting there or in my discord.  But since he's an asswipe,  I just use his thread to pimp my bot because it pisses him off so much and run his name through the mud everytime he says something snake oil'ish (which is just about every post he makes lol).  I probably get ZERO traffic from this site in regards to my bot,  but it really pisses him off so I still do it even though it doesnt help the bot referrals one single bit.  I get more from my DLive and youtube channels than I would get here in 100 years.  You know somethin is wrong with the way you do business when one of your top referrers talks shit about you (well he doesnt get it but others do lol).

Ok yea I get that point and its common to a ton of websites, I dont really disagree with you and its something everyone needs to consider when they leave the blockchain to deposit with a website.  
 This is not just crypto though, its kinda similar to a deposit with a bank, there is a real systemic risk where that deposit makes the customer a creditor.   Heres a good video I watched on this type of larger problem ignored by most, it might at some point count when all banks are affected by the same factors like 2008 demonstrated, in places like Cyprus it wasnt theoretical:
https://youtu.be/EC0G7pY4wRE?t=346

   I noticed every comment you make is on this website and this thread in criticism but this company is no bad actor in crypto sector so I'm not sure why your so dedicated to the cause.     Its not a recent startup, its donkeys years old its not really a risk but fair enough its a factor of risk to consider.   I have been exit scammed a few times in crypto, never large amount not that I have amounts large to lose but I never expect longevity as yea it happens.    I have also had that in my normal gambling and FIAT setup, they had my ID but wanted more ID and so on.    KYC can be used to scam and theres all sorts of tricks used so I get the general idea that maintaining ownership is a positive feature for any setup

I gave you a merit anyway but Im not agreeing especially theres anything negative to criticise about Freebitco but its a point to remember in general

Yes, the stats server had an issue. It just needed rebooting. It doesn't affect anything other than historical data being temporarily off-line.

it's just a display glitch or minor server hiccup, happened a few times before
and if you check under stats tab, all personal stats are missing too
but I believe all member data/stats are just fine, stored, updated (server side) and backup properly

  Today I noticed that the daily interest paid day by day is missing! I enjoyed seeing that because it made feel secure seeing my daily interest paid. Now, I have to write my final balance down, then check my balance to see if it was added. Please add it back.  I have been a year long member or longer.

ACCOUNT BALANCE  0.09 674671

DAILY INTEREST 0.00001060 BTC

MONTHLY INTEREST (30d) 0.00031857 BTC

YEARLY INTEREST (365d) 0.00394775 BTC

WIth the sum they have, You'd want a few wallets with a 4-of-5 multisig at least (two individuals being queeny and wetty and then three more random entities). But then you're still stuck with a dilemma. Anyone who wants to get involed in what is essentially a deep onion gambling business (for all intents and purposed - sure it's on the light web but that's just because it's no longer as well censored and there are a lot of deep onion sites with more morals)...

Anyway, this would still lead to an unreasonable vulnerability unless the money was stored in somewhere like an actual UK business and they got a license for it (whihc they're not going to do for some reason?) - there are gambling sites that run of bitcoin which have licenses now as far as I can tell, I don't know why freebitco.in doesn't go in and try to get one or at least should've got one before it was illegal not to (I'm guessing they're from the uk otherwise why would they use the BVI to hideout).

The point is that there are BTC technologies that can be used to fix the "bearer is owner and king" problem.  It's been brought up 100s of times and dozens of other sites that use this have been given as examples.  It forces wetback and thequack into an accountability problem in that they would then be held accountable for every transaction that is made (which currently does not exist.  at all. in any form).  If they want to move capitol from a cold wallet to a hot wallet,  someone needs to be asked to do so.  If the reverse is true,  someone should STILL be asked to sign and do so.  If they are hacked,  hacker would have to get permission from everyone to steal anything.  If wetback and thequack wanted to exit scam, they'd literally have to ask permission to do it.  If have to ask what I'm referring to,  then you should probably just quit crypto now while you still can because you are not equipped to handle the sphere as it is currently.  Come back in about 30 years when it's all click-n-go.

Not sure why thats a point, BTC is fungible so the coin doesnt have to be exact ownership or unique and like almost every website the storage is not kept with the users wallet but thats the same alot of places.   Every company has a common interest with customers but there is also the case of if its really immediately required, he already responded that using two accounts is feasible so long as not relying on taking advantage.    I get people would just like clarity and the option of the singular account but its hardly a great negative argument to make