I'm not an affiliate but I make no secret that I have made a reasonable amount of Bitcoin from using the site since it first started. Wetsuit used to answer any negativity in the threads back in those days, I just do that now because I don't like to see baseless accusations going unanswered.
They are not being offered a $5 incentive to do so.
If you go back a few months people were suggesting it was rigged because a some low numbered older accounts won a few times. It also seems quite logical that newer accounts have a higher probability of still being active.
Actually, the drivel was when you said "supposed to be provably fair". It is provably fair and that means YOU can prove it. You may have shied away from making a direct accusation that they are cheating but that is the exactly what your message conveys.
When the lottery was first introduced it wasn't a provably fair system and people rightly raised concerns in these threads. Wetsuit asked for suggestions as how to make a provably fair lottery and worked with people here to come up with an indisputable system where the Bitcoin blockchain picks the winners.
The crypto gambling industry is entirely reliant on reputation, I don't think it's cool to smear a site that has done so much to prove itself.
I am merely making an observation and I have done this before. I was also one of the people showing concern that one of my favourite faucets introduced a Lottery system that was not fair. Their comments back then was that they were waiting for other people to come up with suggestions for a provably fair solution.
Since then, a lot of people have hinted that nobody is reporting any Lottery winnings, but people are reporting Free roll winnings.
All criticism is not negative. I politely put it out there that the "Lottery" winners is still a bit suspect and that it should be looked at. There is no need to get all rallied up about this. When you observe something strange, you comment on that to improve the system.
I have been using this faucet for years