I am not posting this to throw shades at the devs, i simply would like a clarification as to whether there is some level of truth in this or if it is just mere banter
Results are not "banter". Like anything in life, someone can say whatever they want, but actions (or in this case, results), speak louder than words.
The only real stat you need to look at to confirm that these levels are not really worth anything is the last one. 1 in 1 billion chance to win $15000? Compare that to your local scratch ticket odds and you'll see how absurd it is. Then from that you can assume that every other level is just as absurd without having to actually spend anything to test results. And thats not even to mention that the scratch tickets cost FAR FAR FAR FAR less than the 120 or whatever rolls you get with the highest WoF bonus since you cant buy RP. You're better off buying scratch tickets using the BTC you get from "encash" than wasting RP on the WoF bonus levels.
The removal of the old Rewards bonus and being replaced with this watered down terrible "free roll" is a testament to just how badly the casino itself is doing. They are having to take more than give than ever before because they are losing new customers to casinos that offer more crypto choices other than just BTC (You can see this trend in the monthly "wager" contest stats, just compare the stats to months ago and you'll see the massive drop). BTC is just to expensive for the average person to gamble with now. While I respect the decision to only offer non-scam cryptos (everything other than BTC is basically a scam anyway), they negate the logic behind that decision by introducing a complete scam asset called "FUN" where they own nearly the entire supply. They would have been better off sticking with their original Reward point Bonus OR introducing other cryptos such as LTC, VTC, or whatever asset they see fit thats more affordable to the normal user. At least it wouldnt have been a TOTAL scam like FUN is.
I dont believe in the FUN token as being an asset to own for this reason: FBC owns over 90% of the total supply and they run wash accounts on Binance to manipulate the price. Now, the same could be said for other cryptos as well but with those, the majority owner isnt also the service you are using either. If you read the FunFair news releases about the buyout and then compare them to the FBC news release, you'll see that FBC doesnt really want people to know what they did. They tried to market it as some sort of "partnership" instead when thats clearly not what happened. FunFair states facts while FBC's releases just sugar coat things with marketing garbage.
If there was a comparison for FUN, I would compare it to Bitconnect. It's just a ponzi scheme thats eventually going to go to zero or near zero once the casino runs out of funds, time, or ability to manipulate it's price or they lose the ability to convince people that it's legit. Just because something is worth a lot or is going up in price doesnt make it legit. Bitconnect is a perfect example of that. It went straight up for YEARS before it then went straight down to zero in less than 3 days. It was even well known that it was a total scam yet it continued to go up. Once the new money dried up and BTC price went up, Bitconnect fell like a house of cards. FUN is going to suffer the same fate.
I could offer suggestions on a better token to use but then I'd be biased. If anyone were to select a token for FBC, it should have been the users, not the owners (as they are clearly biased). A public Poll would have been a GREAT marketing tool and an even better legitimacy tool.