Pages:
Author

Topic: FREEMAN ON THE LAND - page 3. (Read 515 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
February 27, 2023, 09:57:05 AM
#7
Much of our freedom problem doesn't have to do with who or what we think we are, but it has to do with what other people think we said we are.

For example. If one fills out an application for a drivers license, for himself he is not stating that he is a person (a simple name) on a piece of paper, subject to the driving laws and rules. But that's the way the government interprets it because of language usage... grammar and spelling and punctuation technicalities and 'perfections'. Government can only understand what the quasi-contract/agreement says in their 'perfect' understanding of grammar and spelling and punctuation. They can't understand anything into it, like the fact that you are a man/woman who means something entirely different by what you said... the colloquialisms and standard idioms that you apply to the meanings of the words written on the application. They can't understand this stuff, simply because they don't know what you think. And you, obviously, don't know what they mean by the writing on their application, or the connotations of such writing.

Some examples:

- Technically, if you express yourself using the word "I" capitalized, you are stating that you are a person, a name on a piece of paper. You need to used lower case "i" and include that you are a man or woman, somewhere in the document. The form of such a sentence would be, "i, man, [your name], blah, blah, blah, etc.

- As I have stated elsewhere, a person is not a people (man or woman). Take a look at the US Constitution. Both words are used, 'people' and 'person'. But 'person' is used a whole lot more than 'people'. Why? Because 'people' are flesh and blood human beings, but persons are names on contracts and agreements. Persons are people in office. What is your office in government if government gets you to say that you are a person? Could be many different things, like a defendant in a court case. See https://redress4dummies.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/office-of-person1.pdf.

- Look through driving statutes in the "Code" for your state government. Check to see the definitions of the word person in the driving laws - because statutes rarely use "man" or "woman" written within them. Then check out the definition in of person in the definitions section. "Man" or "woman" won't generally be included... because a man or woman is not a person.

- Sign government documents like this, "non-assumpsit, [your signature]." Non-assumpsit essentially means 'no-contract,' or 'no-agreement'. Government may catch it and disallow your signature if you sign this way, but this can be used on many government forms that go to third parties, and not directly to government... such as an IRS Form W-4. Your employer gets the form, but since it is a form between you and the IRS, he doesn't have any say over what you tell the IRS.

- Using square brackets "[]" or boxes around words you say on paperwork, means that the words within the brackets or box aren't part of your document, even though they are on the paperwork. Government does this all the time with their paperwork, thinking that you don't understand. If you ever get a subpoena or indictment from government, look at the wording that is in the boxes. Make a copy of the paperwork, and white out what is inside the boxes or square brackets. Then reread what the document really says.

There are loads of simple things like this that government and attorneys use to trick you into saying that you are a person rather than a man or woman... because they have control over persons, but rarely men or women.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 608
Merit: 264
Freedom, Natural Law
February 27, 2023, 03:03:23 AM
#6
Humans have intrinsic values, moral judgments, possess reason and free will to govern.
Natural Law is found right ⁴ on the political spectrum.
As it is fact based it has no space for religious mambo jumbo, Nature is the guidance.
U.S. Supreme Court justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch are proponents of natural law.

sr. member
Activity: 608
Merit: 264
Freedom, Natural Law
February 26, 2023, 04:18:06 PM
#5
While there are many examples in law that state what the following court case points out, government has done their best to hide the following words of this court case from us. I have heard that one can find these words at some law libraries in old annotations. But if anyone has a link to them online other than this one - a real, lawful link - I would like to know.


US v Minker, 350 US 179 at 187(1956)
� Supreme Court of the United States 1795 "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."


Cool

http://annavonreitz.com/exactoriginalcitation.pdf
http://www.annavonreitz.com/youroffertocontract.pdf
S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doanes Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795
Penhallow v. Doanes Administrators, DECIDED Feb. 24, 1795   (ARGUED Feb. 6, 9-14, 16, 1795)

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of
the MIND ONLY with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality
nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law agency, aspect,
court, etc., can concern itself with anything other than Corporate, Artificial Persons and
the Contracts between them.”

Quote
quote is genuine.  It's just in the Appendix of the case and not in the case itself
https://web.archive.org/web/20160728233221/https://www.oom2.com/t40090-anna-von-reitz-making-it-up-as-he-goes
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
February 26, 2023, 01:56:08 PM
#4
While there are many examples in law that state what the following court case points out, government has done their best to hide the following words of this court case from us. I have heard that one can find these words at some law libraries in old annotations. But if anyone has a link to them online other than this one - a real, lawful link - I would like to know.


US v Minker, 350 US 179 at 187(1956)
� Supreme Court of the United States 1795 "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."


Cool
sr. member
Activity: 608
Merit: 264
Freedom, Natural Law
February 26, 2023, 11:44:07 AM
#3
All economies in the world are based on capital and individualism, and we are not in an economy based on controlling resources according to the specificity of each people or the specificity of each region. I remember years ago that the Zeitgeist movement appeared and tried to present new ideas aimed at getting out of the world from the stage of depleting the resources of our planet. Unfortunately, this movement no longer exists or has ceased to be active because it did not receive enough attention. I expect the same scenario to happen with the so-called FREEMAN ON THE LAND movement.
Natural Law is not a new idea, it is the oldest and highest law. It is a God given right (Human rights)
A system of right, common to all humans, it's nature based and not some freak "rulers" known as steerment.
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1474
🔃EN>>AR Translator🔃
February 26, 2023, 11:21:14 AM
#2
All economies in the world are based on capital and individualism, and we are not in an economy based on controlling resources according to the specificity of each people or the specificity of each region. I remember years ago that the Zeitgeist movement appeared and tried to present new ideas aimed at getting out of the world from the stage of depleting the resources of our planet. Unfortunately, this movement no longer exists or has ceased to be active because it did not receive enough attention. I expect the same scenario to happen with the so-called FREEMAN ON THE LAND movement.
sr. member
Activity: 608
Merit: 264
Freedom, Natural Law
February 26, 2023, 01:56:08 AM
#1
Corrupt Government and carrier politicians dont like freedom preaching people living in peace with their neighbors and with nature.
The Freeman Movement is a generally peaceful people who live in a way where they do not depend on or need government to take care of them and just want to be left alone.
https://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/freeman-on-the-land-sovereign/

The "Natural Law" king, just walks out and leaves the fictitious court.
https://youtu.be/1rUPFXbADvE
Pages:
Jump to: