Author

Topic: [FRSH] FreshCoin | Freshcoin for 1$ into game | LOW ALGO | POM | FRESH online!* - page 173. (Read 334880 times)

member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
Anyone can confirm the 15-20% less energy consumption yet?

For a 6 750 Ti rig, for nicehash and uro coin which are both x11, I get a watt meter reading of 395 watts. For freshcoin, I'm getting around 370 watts (reading fluctuates between 353 to 384 watts)

Do you mean 370W is for the whole rig with 6 cards in it?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
I am getting only 3.5 MHs for my 280x on PIMP 1.5.51 with the following config. Miner compiled from this source https://github.com/savale/sph-sgminer_fresh. Someone told me I should get 4.5 Mhz with this clock/mem speed. What gives?

Quote
{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "stratum+tcp://fresh.suprnova.cc:5000",
      "user" : "Lucifa.1",
      "pass" : "x"
   }
]
,
"auto-fan" : true,
"intensity" : "18",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"shaders" : "0",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.00",
"gpu-fan" : "10-90",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "90",
"temp-target" : "80",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"expiry" : "20",
"scan-time" : "60",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"kernel" : "fresh"
}

sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 254
My guess is most people weren't online when the actual launch happened. Normally I don't engage in name calling on the forums but the dev is either lazy or incompetent (my vote on the latter). The so called wallet had/has dogecoin logo attached to it. Then the miner testing was done on the main net rather than the testnet allowing 70-80 blocks to be mined even before the coin was launched. So anyone mining with a view other than dumping it when it debuts on the exchange, stop now, there is no future for this coin.

Actually, the launch was pretty decent compared to the average launches these days. The dogecoin logo in the installer is just an image which got left over. In fact I think it's funny how people responded to that while some devs are using other coins' complete code instead of images and nobody cares (you decide which is worse).
The miner testing happened on testnet, although the first 70 or so blocks were indeed mined early because someone compiled the wallet before the password was released. Basically anybody who is upset about that instamined 30.000 coins while so far over 700.000 coins were mined is pretty much just jelous it wasn't him. Either way, it is silly to claim it can't have a future.
This line of argument is why I love frequenting the altcoin board. So basically what you are saying is if it is not worse than the most shitcoins out there, it is good? Yep, thats the low level every coin should aspire to. Why bother doing something in a better way when you can be mix existing algos (to actually not be x11 or x13 or x20 or x99), claim it to be fresh algo.

I think its idiotic to claim people are being jealous. Its just another coin in the wild, missed it? Meh! happens all the time. Its just that people should be aware of it. But if your arguements are to used as a yardstick well however silly it may seem to you, lets talk 3 mths down the line.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 130
Wow diff going down to 600
Where can i rent some hash?

Want to mine FRESH and need more hash? Why not rent what you need?
FRESH Mining Rigs Available!

https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/fresh
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
what miner for solo mining?
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
anyone got confirmed coins on supernova yet??
Wait, too long for confirm. I've just go confirmed on suprnova
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
My guess is most people weren't online when the actual launch happened. Normally I don't engage in name calling on the forums but the dev is either lazy or incompetent (my vote on the latter). The so called wallet had/has dogecoin logo attached to it. Then the miner testing was done on the main net rather than the testnet allowing 70-80 blocks to be mined even before the coin was launched. So anyone mining with a view other than dumping it when it debuts on the exchange, stop now, there is no future for this coin.

Actually, the launch was pretty decent compared to the average launches these days. The dogecoin logo in the installer is just an image which got left over. In fact I think it's funny how people responded to that while some devs are using other coins' complete code instead of images and nobody cares (you decide which is worse).
The miner testing happened on testnet, although the first 70 or so blocks were indeed mined early because someone compiled the wallet before the password was released. Basically anybody who is upset about that instamined 30.000 coins while so far over 700.000 coins were mined is pretty much just jelous it wasn't him. Either way, it is silly to claim it can't have a future.
sr. member
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
mmmmmm
Why did you not update the address version!? This means that a FRAC and a FRESH address are the same and both start with F Sad
sr. member
Activity: 435
Merit: 250
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
Would 3.5MHs be enough to be worth trying solo mining?

If I'm not mistaken, at the moment you would need 234 hours on average to find a block with that hashrate.

That hash rate is quite low for solo mining as many farms have already jumped in.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
@kryptographer
Are they lying about keeping the energy bills down? This miner is almost as hot a scrypt... anyone else noticing that?

There are no low energy algorithms, only poorly optimized miners.

Any tips for AMD 290x?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
My guess is most people weren't online when the actual launch happened. Normally I don't engage in name calling on the forums but the dev is either lazy or incompetent (my vote on the latter).

Yeah lazy ... 3 miners ready and a rental service at start... the testnet was on another chain if you compare the pics before and the dev said he forgot to delete the doge logo for setuplaunch
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 254
Where is the major hash rate coming from?

 I see 50,000MH for the net.  The listed pools in the OP total only 4000MH.


solo miners mostly. dev was kind enough to allow miners to be released pre-launch for "testing purposes" on the main net. It was 1GH/s even before the coin debuted.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
shit! where is the Bittrex link? Angry
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 254
My guess is most people weren't online when the actual launch happened. Normally I don't engage in name calling on the forums but the dev is either lazy or incompetent (my vote on the latter). The so called wallet had/has dogecoin logo attached to it. Then the miner testing was done on the main net rather than the testnet allowing 70-80 blocks to be mined even before the coin was launched. So anyone mining with a view other than dumping it when it debuts on the exchange, stop now, there is no future for this coin.
sr. member
Activity: 342
Merit: 250
Where is the major hash rate coming from?

 I see 50,000MH for the net.  The listed pools in the OP total only 4000MH.



suprnova has 27,763 MH/s now
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
Would 3.5MHs be enough to be worth trying solo mining?

If I'm not mistaken, at the moment you would need 234 hours on average to find a block with that hashrate.
Jump to: