further improved phatk_dia kernel for Phoenix + SDK 2.6 - 2012-01-13 - page 16.

BOARBEAR

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: Vince on July 09, 2011, 09:04:58 AM

Hi Diapolo!

Great to see you're making progress!
There's one thing that pops into my eye:

you already do:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

why not add the K[60] right into it and remove from upper instruction? Saves a whole instruction and will work 100% ;-)

if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

Lets see if I can find more ..

how would this save an instruction? did you just move -K[60]?

BOARBEAR

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: Vince on July 10, 2011, 08:12:49 AM

Vals[7] += K[60] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

to this
Vals[7] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

is this a typo or did you leave out the "="?

should be:

Vals[7] += Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

do i need to change if(Vals[7].y == -H[7])?
and if(Vals[7] == -H[7])?

indio007

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

That Worked , i managed to go from 306-308MH to 308-310MH on 5830.
donations forth coming if it remains stable. Thx...

Vince

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Vals[7] += K[60] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

to this
Vals[7] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

is this a typo or did you leave out the "="?

should be:

Vals[7] += Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 772

Merit: 500

Next kernel version will, once more, be faster for 69XX and 58XX cards

. Stay tuned!

Dia

indio007

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: gominoa on July 10, 2011, 02:19:09 AM

Quote from: indio007 on July 09, 2011, 04:07:32 PM

In Kernel.cl
I changed this:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

to this
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

Try also changing:
if(Vals[7].y == -H[7])
... to ...
if(Vals[7].y == -H[7]-K[60])

notice Y instead of X. Will be just below the X line

Same error

gominoa

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Quote from: indio007 on July 09, 2011, 04:07:32 PM

In Kernel.cl
I changed this:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

to this
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

Try also changing:
if(Vals[7].y == -H[7])
... to ...
if(Vals[7].y == -H[7]-K[60])

notice Y instead of X. Will be just below the X line

1bitc0inplz

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

This most recent update is everything you said it would be!

My 5830 went from 295 MH/s to 305 MH/s with just this update!

Thanks for the great work.

indio007

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vince on July 09, 2011, 02:34:44 PM

Quote from: indio007 on July 09, 2011, 01:09:16 PM

Vince i editted the code like you said and I got errors.

Which one of the changes did you try, both?

Tell me about the error you got, just "does not work" helps nobody!

In Kernel.cl
I changed this:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

to this
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

and changed this

Vals[7] += K[60] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

to this
Vals[7] + Vals[3] + P4(124) + P3(124) + P2(124) + P1(124) + s1(124) + ch(124);

Then i changed this
Vals[7] = (Vals[3] = (u)0xb956c25b + D1 + s1(4) + ch(4)) + H1;

to this

Vals[7] = (Vals[3] = D1 + s1(4) + ch(4)) + H1;

as instructed here and yes i added the line to init.py

Quote

Add

self.state2[3] = np.uint32(self.state2[3] + 0xb956c25b);

to __init__.py, line 77 for me, right behind:

self.calculateF(data)

And remove (u)0xb956c25b from kernel.cl

The error is opencl is having unusual behavior or something. it shows MH etc... just when it seems to want to accept a share it spits that out

Vince

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Quote from: indio007 on July 09, 2011, 01:09:16 PM

Vince i editted the code like you said and I got errors.

Which one of the changes did you try, both?

Tell me about the error you got, just "does not work" helps nobody!

indio007

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Vince i editted the code like you said and I got errors.

Diapola what you did works fine. I have 2 5830's testing with now. Expect some Bit.love is all goes well.

huayra.agera

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

I hope you can make an optimization for the next OCL version (v2.5 (684.212)) available in beta form already. =)

bcforum

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

What parameters are you using with phatk?

On my normally aspirated R6970 Lightning I get 419.xMH/s (Ma fix in poclbm):

Code:

-k poclbm DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=13 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=64 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false

The fastest I've ever gotten with phatk is 403.xMH/s

Code:

-k phatk DEVICE=0 AGGRESSION=13 BFI_INT WORKSIZE=256 VECTORS FASTLOOP=false

Any suggestions?

Vince

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Another addition waiting to be removed:

Vals[7] = (Vals[3] = (u)0xb956c25b + D1 + s1(4) + ch(4)) + H1;

-> D1 is only used here, so why not add (u)0xb956c25b during precalculation? Wink

Add

self.state2[3] = np.uint32(self.state2[3] + 0xb956c25b);

to __init__.py, line 77 for me, right behind:

self.calculateF(data)

And remove (u)0xb956c25b from kernel.cl

This also works 100%, no logic change involved here.

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 772

Merit: 500

Quote from: Vince on July 09, 2011, 09:04:58 AM

Hi Diapolo!

Great to see you're making progress!
There's one thing that pops into my eye:

you already do:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

why not add the K[60] right into it and remove from upper instruction? Saves a whole instruction and will work 100% ;-)

if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

Lets see if I can find more ..

Good idea and works, can't verify via KernelAnalyzer, but seems like a vector addition less.
Will be included in the next version!

Dia

Vince

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

Hi Diapolo!

Great to see you're making progress!
There's one thing that pops into my eye:

you already do:
if(Vals[7].x == -H[7])

why not add the K[60] right into it and remove from upper instruction? Saves a whole instruction and will work 100% ;-)

if(Vals[7].x == -H[7]-K[60])

Lets see if I can find more ..

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 772

Merit: 500

Quote from: error on July 08, 2011, 04:58:24 PM

These two changes have taken my 5850s from 345MHash/sec to 360MHash/sec. Very nice.

5830s seem like THE card for my modded kernel. Great to hear

.

Dia

Diapolo

hero member

Activity: 772

Merit: 500

Quote from: BOARBEAR on July 08, 2011, 01:28:38 PM

Quote from: Diapolo on July 08, 2011, 12:27:00 AM

Quote from: BOARBEAR on July 07, 2011, 07:55:40 PM

I have a feature request

Can you please make it work with intel openCL?

thank you

I know that Intel recently released and OpenCL gold SDK ... the kernel uses standard OpenCL commands and an AMD extension only for BFI_INT / BITALIGN. I see no reason why it should not work. Have you got some error logs for me? You know that for Intel it will only use the CPUs!?

Dia

I have tried. Poclum will not run at all. It crashed upon starting.

I took a look at the code. I think the comments are messy and some not really helpful. Do you think its an good idea to 'fix' the comment? btw comment why you type cast the hex value so other developer wont think its unnecessary and remove it.

Hex-values are type-casted so that the kernel works with AMD 2.1 SDK, which throws an error, if NOT type-casted.
I don't understand what you want to tell me with the "comments are messy" part.

If you get an error log with Intel SDK please post it here, so I can have a look at it.

Dia

error

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 500

These two changes have taken my 5850s from 345MHash/sec to 360MHash/sec. Very nice.

BOARBEAR

member

Activity: 77

Merit: 10

Quote from: Diapolo on July 08, 2011, 12:27:00 AM

Quote from: BOARBEAR on July 07, 2011, 07:55:40 PM

I have a feature request

Can you please make it work with intel openCL?

thank you

I know that Intel recently released and OpenCL gold SDK ... the kernel uses standard OpenCL commands and an AMD extension only for BFI_INT / BITALIGN. I see no reason why it should not work. Have you got some error logs for me? You know that for Intel it will only use the CPUs!?

Dia

I have tried. Poclum will not run at all. It crashed upon starting.

I took a look at the code. I think the comments are messy and some not really helpful. Do you think its an good idea to 'fix' the comment? btw comment why you type cast the hex value so other developer wont think its unnecessary and remove it.

Topic: further improved phatk_dia kernel for Phoenix + SDK 2.6 - 2012-01-13 - page 16. (Read 106928 times)