Ok, i finally did some power usage tests.
All these tests are with 3x R9 XFX Fury X, Intel I5, 16GB Corsair Vengeance, 2 x Corsair AX 860i
Test number 1:
This is an X11 test, all 3 cards doing 11.5 Mhz @ around 35 degrees.
Complete rig is pulling just over 680 Watt & 3.1 amps
Picture
http://s10.postimg.org/rjex7v0mh/IMG_7064.png
Test number 2:
Quark @ 23 Mhz per card @ around 38 Degrees.
Rig is pulling 776 Watt & 3.5 amps
Picture
http://s8.postimg.org/ingyj319h/IMG_7065.png
Test number 3:
Siacoin @ 1.9 Ghz per card @ around 40 Degrees.
Rig is pulling around 1006 Watt & 4.6 amps.
Picture
http://s13.postimg.org/uzpna2a5z/IMG_7066.png
Knowing all of this i can only conclude that there is much to do for X11 & Quark. I have a feeling X11 will definitely be able to go over 20Mhz and Quark should be able to go over 30Mhz with ease.
Also it is clear and allready known that they love power, as do almost all of the AMD cards.
in Case number 1, the complete rig is pulling almost 700 Watt, take 100 watt out (Processor, mobo and such) and a single card is @ around 200Watt, not bad though for doing 11+Mhz.
However as you can see in case number 3, the complete rig is pulling over 1000 Watt with only 3 cards. So they're easily pulling 300Watt per card. And i'm sure i haven't hit the top speed on Siacoin.
If there's anyone who wants to see a test on another algo. Just ask. No problem!
Greetings!
Topic: Fury X mining performance - page 3. (Read 22371 times)
The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4.
Running quark algo pushed my gtx980 over 100% load. However, x11 algo seems to be slightly less than that.You probably don't know, officially my house heater has 109% efficiency.
The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4.
Running quark algo pushed my gtx980 over 100% load. However, x11 algo seems to be slightly less than that.You probably don't know, officially my house heater has 109% efficiency.
The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4.
Running quark algo pushed my gtx980 over 100% load. However, x11 algo seems to be slightly less than that. The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4.
The numbers seems too low, but these are reference cards.
My gigabyte 970 oc is doing 16.2 MHASH in the quark algo on the factory clock. Faster than the 980 reference in the cryptomining blog.
my zotac 980 oc card is doing 18 MHASH++
The main problem is hashing rarely causes cards to go full load. I'm pretty sure groestl at 30.6MHs on 980Ti isn't full load nor qubit at 17.4.
TDP is usually accurate for reference design card in terms of power consumption. For example a reference design GTX970 will consume around 145W under full load while GTX980 will consume around 165W.
However, if the card is not based on reference design, then usually the manufacturer will increase the TDP to hit higher clock speed to squeeze out more performance.
However, if the card is not based on reference design, then usually the manufacturer will increase the TDP to hit higher clock speed to squeeze out more performance.
@sp
TDP isn't power consumption.İt's Thermal Design Power,"It is maximum amount of heat generated by the CPU,GPU" And u know better then us,you are coder, power consumption depends on kernel efficeincy too(,so we caannot tkae TDP base of real Power consumption.) miners like us
just focused to power consumption from wall ))).I think fury X have less power consumpiton then dual 970's (i bios edited all of my 970's with %40 Tdp more .It fluctates 150-190W per card with o/c,avarege 180W+) I knew this diagram of maxwells's M8 
)
TDP isn't power consumption.İt's Thermal Design Power,"It is maximum amount of heat generated by the CPU,GPU" And u know better then us,you are coder, power consumption depends on kernel efficeincy too(,so we caannot tkae TDP base of real Power consumption.) miners like us
just focused to power consumption from wall ))).I think fury X have less power consumpiton then dual 970's (i bios edited all of my 970's with %40 Tdp more .It fluctates 150-190W per card with o/c,avarege 180W+) I knew this diagram of maxwells's M8 ) Regarding X11: with my mod i hit 11Mhz+, with the same mod i only get 7Mhz on a 290x. Knowing that i hit 9.5 mhz with wolf his mod/binary.
So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct.
I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again
@fenomenhaa
It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked.
Greetings
So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct.
I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again
@fenomenhaa
It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked.
Greetings
Interesting.
here are the hashrates for the gtx 980,gtx980ti and the titanx (reference cards, on standard clocks)
Tested with ccMiner 1.5.51 SP-MOD
The latest version(1.5.55) will give higher rates on lyra2,x11,quark etc
More at:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/4861-crypto-mining-performance-of-the-new-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti/
The furyx reference design has a tdp of 275W and the gtx 970 has a tdp of 150W.
Thanks M8's )))
@Eliovp We discussed about just over hashing speed, There is also Power consumption side too.Fury X sure needs less energy. Did you checked the power consumption from wall?
)))@Eliovp We discussed about just over hashing speed, There is also Power consumption side too.Fury X sure needs less energy. Did you checked the power consumption from wall?
Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards ))
))On the furyx quark is doing 22 MHASH with the russian closed source miner.(5MHASH with the opensource miner)
2x 970 cards will cost around same as 1 furyx, and the hashrate is much higher. Lyra2re: 3.950 MHASH vs 420khash (9,4 times faster on the 970's)
Release 54
2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC
)
EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB
QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s
LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53
QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s
X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s
X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s
X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s
KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s
Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!
2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC
)EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB
QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s
LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53
QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s
X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s
X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s
X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s
KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s
Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!
True _sp, quark is only doing 23Mh. But this is with a non Fiji optimized binary.
If with the same source a fiji binary is compiled the hashrate will definitely hit 30 if not 35Mhz.
Regarding X11: with my mod i hit 11Mhz+, with the same mod i only get 7Mhz on a 290x. Knowing that i hit 9.5 mhz with wolf his mod/binary.
So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct.
I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again
@fenomenhaa
It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked.
Greetings
Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards ))
))On the furyx quark is doing 22 MHASH with the russian closed source miner.(5MHASH with the opensource miner)
2x 970 cards will cost around same as 1 furyx, and the hashrate is much higher. Lyra2re: 3.950 MHASH vs 420khash (9,4 times faster on the 970's)
Release 54
2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC )
EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB
QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s
LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53
QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s
X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s
X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s
X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s
KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s
Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!
2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC
)EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB
QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
31 350 khash/s
LYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53
QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
25 500 khash/s
X11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
16 450 khash/s
X13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 600 khash/s
X15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
15 200 khash/s
KECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm)
ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x
878 800 khash/s
Thanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !!
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests.
New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png
Will do some other tests later.
Greetings
)) The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them
Wow! What are your ambient temperatures? I know a lot of people who do multiple rigs have a room that gets pretty warm but this can't be the case with this rig right?Nope. You are not right. The graphic card will dissipate the same amount of heat. Liquid or air cooling doesn't matter in such context. If the graphic card produces let's say 250W of heat it will dissipate 250W in your room anyway.
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests.
New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
Will do some other tests later.
Greetings
The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.
I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..
Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.
Greetings
33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz..
The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them
It's around 25 Degrees in my warehouse. 20 cards in total, all of them under 70Degrees, (i keep em that way though..)
So yeah, the Fury's are at full power only 10-15 Degrees hotter then my space
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests.
New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
Will do some other tests later.
Greetings
The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.
I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..
Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.
Greetings
33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz..
The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests.
New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png
Will do some other tests later.
Greetings
The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot.
I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any..
Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes.
Greetings
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests.
New X11 result: 11Mhz
Screenshot
http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.png
Will do some other tests later.
Greetings
Why is Scrypt performance not on that list?
Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.
280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards
)
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs
Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.
280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards
)280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs
Very good point. I hoped for some scrypt numbers too.
Well, as most know, every driver above 13.11 or so will give Hardware errors or bad hashrate when mining Scrypt.
13.11 drivers just simply do not work with Fury X cards.
I have 3 Fury's running and managed to get scrypt running without Hardware errors.
Here are the results.
I can see that the cards are not even doing their best to perform. If i run any other Algo the temps will go up to 45-50 Degrees.
I tried changing worksize, intensity, threads, with every change i did i got Hardware errors, bad results or even Freezing the system.
Results
http://s30.postimg.org/fs3zbmtmp/scrypt.png
Greetings!
Jump to: