Fury X mining performance - page 4. | Bitcointalksearch.org

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

Quote from: atp1916 on July 10, 2015, 06:09:50 AM

Why is Scrypt performance not on that list?

Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.

280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards Tongue

)
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs

Very good point. I hoped for some scrypt numbers too.

atp1916

legendary

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Why is Scrypt performance not on that list?

Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards.

280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards Tongue

)
280x could do 710-760khs
290/x could do 800-1000khs

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: goosoodude on July 09, 2015, 02:50:54 PM

Quote from: okg on July 09, 2015, 11:26:44 AM

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

Can this be real? the differences are huges. Not only a couple percent. the difference from 450KHS to 22.37MHS are enourmous. I did not think that they are so different...

yeah altcoins, they all looks the same Undecided

goosoodude

hero member

Activity: 584

Merit: 500

Quote from: okg on July 09, 2015, 11:26:44 AM

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

Can this be real? the differences are huges. Not only a couple percent. the difference from 450KHS to 22.37MHS are enourmous. I did not think that they are so different...

alh

legendary

Activity: 1846

Merit: 1052

Probably best if you take this to an AltCoin centric forum, rather than a Bitcoin centric forum.

TheRealSteve

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

FUN > ROI

Too bad they're still not testing against (ocl)vanitygen .. I mean, if it runs at all, of course

okg

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS

Test from cryptomining blog

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

I wonder if any of you tested the fury X with various mining algorithms?

Topic: Fury X mining performance - page 4. (Read 22378 times)