I'm afraid this is nowhere near the case
It may be so only in your imagination, i.e. how you imagine things should be, and not how they actually are ("you only see what your eyes want to see"). In reality, we see quite a lot of drama (in fact, too much drama) around purely technical issues (I refer to SegWit versus BigBlocks versus whatever else). I can't possibly gather how that could ever count as self-evolvement. It is still people behind Bitcoin as they are behind any technology out there. I'm really doubtful and unsure if it is really close to "the more it evolves the more healthier the future of bitcoin will become". That remains to be seen, and that might not take too much waiting
There are beliefs that the more the technology advances, the more people become chaotic. There's even a religion called Raelism or Rael whereas advancing in technology is seen as an evil act and people should remain primitive. Settling with the old ways and never inventing new things is seen as a good act.
I sort of agree with that. Even right now, with the political things happening with SegWit and whatnot, it's making people including bitcoin users become doubtful if their coins are still safe. A regular guy that just invested on bitcoins for money doesn't know what SegWit means and what will happen the coin splits.
As more and more technologies and options are available for bitcoin's development, more topics are open for debate on people. And people will never agree to one single idea because everyone has different desires and everyone wants to say something about everything. More dramas that will eventually lead to chaos.
There is a hidden contradiction in your post
Which makes your reasoning inconsistent and your sort of agreement untenable. Basically, you said that with advancement of technology people understand less and less how it actually works (beyond their field of professional interest, obviously), so we should get back to stone axes and flint arrowheads, i.e. something which everyone is allegedly able to understand (in reality, it is not so, and that's why Raelism or Rael is meaningless). But at the same time you say that people more and more engage in debates about the topics which they don't have a slightest clue about. Obviously, they won't agree since they are clueless and debating not for the sake of agreement in the first place. People just like to argue and quarrel. Maybe, they had better mind their own business, something they understand?