I think it depends on the agreement on whether the gambling license provider will either monitor them after they already issued them a license or not anymore, as long as they are paying right. I believe some of the things which are not stated on their contract isn't their liability and responsibility anymore, hence, maybe some company just leave the concerns and issues all to the casino themself as they are the ones who are mainly responsible for their customers complaints and feedbacks. Because after all, the services are offered by the casinos, not the provider.
But i think it would still be good if ever there would still be some sort of connection to the license provider and the casino so that they could check if the casino is still worth the chance to offer and renew the license to. Although this decision would lie to the hands of the provider because the situation seems hard itself and would just add another work to attend to.
Topic: Gambling company's responsibility - page 4. (Read 333 times)
If there are no complaints brought to their attention I doubt if they are going to take action, in my opinion, the reputation of the casino has more weight than the license it's displaying on their home page, reputation, and the kind of complaints lodged against a casino are the things that will make us decide if we are going to play on that casino.
If they are doing their job they'll monitor the gambling sites to whom they issued a license. However, most complaints nowadays are only done online, only a few of the complainants are filing a case against a gambling site that cheated them, that's why the provider could make the right action as I think that's their main basis, it has to be proven first before they make their own action.
Maybe not. As long as the casino is paying them the money for the license it's good. The support of the casinos to its customers is perhaps none of their business. I have not seen any discussions about the Curacao license board in forums or on review sites that a casino was slapped on the wrist for scamming. Maybe it's the reason game-protect even got the idea of her business.
Some company give gambling licenses. Curacao company, UK gaming company (UKGC), Danish Gambling Authority etc. Curacao Company licensed some prominent betting sites. Do they monitor after giving license? Now a days a lot of betting sites have gotten license from Curacao but their support is not up to the mark. Even some betting sites scam with customers. Even this forum we have seen some gambling sites negative review.
Jump to: