Gambling credit is a very bad idea, because if player lose, the he will get a lot of problems. And if you have to play with borrowed money, then this means that the player has lost all the money available for this and is now trying to find more money to win, but this is always a bad idea. In gambling, you need to rely only on your own money, otherwise it will always lead to problems.
You're right, it's a terrible idea to gamble in the first place with koan money, debts and selling of properties would be the possibleend results. Taking out loans to place wagers on games is not an advantageous concept; it will almost certainly result in debt, financial difficulties, and account closing down. Gambling benefitted only the persistent and prudent, not the avaricious, because they would always have a chance to incur losses from the system. Most gamblers are motivated by hope and ambition to wager on games with borrowed money in the hopes of repaying it and profiting twice as much.
Well, I think you have said all the consequences of when an assignment is acquired, and if you are right they can be like that, in my very personal opinion I am a player who controls very well what is destined to play and lose in a casino For me , if the money that I have destined to use in the casino runs out because I lost it, I will stay away, I will not start inventing more edpepostitar because I will be going against my own rules and that is something that I never want us to be able to and should not do neither in the game nor in the trade.
Now, if a person who has spent their money in the casino and decides to take a loan, it is because that person has the ability to pay in case they lose, whether it be with jewelry, gold, cars, whatever, it is their decision. of the person, now if the person has nothing or capciada of payment, it is a very bad decision to have taken a loan and secondly things should not be done like this because a person who is of legal age and completely of legal age does not have to recriminate nothing, because it was under his decision that they gave him that credit or loan.
In particular, I am a person who would never take a loan to play in a casino. It seems to me the dumbest way to spend money, because it is very difficult to earn with that pressure that the money is lent, I must also emphasize that things are not how people always imagine them, when you take a loan there is the hope of earning the most money, to repay the loan and make a profit, or worse, to go after what you already spent to see if it can be recovered.
I am one of those who think that when there is a lot to spend in a casino, other types of things can be done, but less for a loan because I consider that a loan in a casino is not as necessary as for other things that are necessary, it is In other words, for things that must be paid for health, or emergencies, of course it is my criteria, I don't see any other, but there are some who give priority to casinos and that is respectable, everyone has their criteria.