Pages:
Author

Topic: Gambling is for big bag holders - page 9. (Read 1463 times)

legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
July 03, 2022, 02:14:48 PM
#39
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.

If you're playing a dice type game, you have already failed and burned your money. There can be no sympathy to anyone who wastes their time on such games that involve zero skill and are guaranteed to lose you money in the long run. The fact that you are putting your faith in utter trash ideas like Martingdale is a reason for you never to gamble again, because at present you simply do not understand some very basic mathematical calculations. Casinos are not charities, they are there to take your money and put it into their pockets. You have to understand that every. single. time. you play a new game, it has no relationship with any previous or future games - that the odds are destined to eventually wipe you out either fast or slow.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 4282
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
July 03, 2022, 01:57:02 PM
#38
It's not a big bag game although just like everything else which involves money, having huge capital has its advantage as you can't compare the gains of someone betting with few dollars and those better with millions. Having just huge bag doesn't guarantee you succeeding as if you aren't luckily you would probably loss all the big bag you thought you had. Haven't you heard stories of gamblers losing thousands of millions. Assuming gaming was just for the big bag holders that means they should be the one wining instead of us hearing stories of them losing.

Gambling has alot to do with skills especially for those games that require skills and knowledge of the game you're playing and luck as well because if you aren't the lucky type you probably will lose all your money trying to win back your losses.
legendary
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1054
July 03, 2022, 12:14:07 PM
#37

i'm sure he have also experience winning and so he kept expecting something might change the course if he keep doubling the bet. its that thought of winning that will also keep a gambler going. he didn't go back to $0.42 after wining but proceed to $6 and then apply the martingale.

dice seem tricky, it makes you win at first and when you start to become very positive that you're going to hit it, a losing streak comes. whats worse  is that its your last money. he floored it to MAX in the last roll. But even the bag holders also lose in dice if he gives all his luck to such game.
full member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 101
July 03, 2022, 11:56:03 AM
#36
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.



sorry for your loss, looks like you spent all the money in your account. discussing the martingale strategy, it is only effective for those who have large and unlimited capital. everyone should learn from experience, I have also tried the martingale strategy several times but the strategy was very bad for me, not effective and profitable at all for those who have small capital.
hero member
Activity: 1918
Merit: 564
July 03, 2022, 11:50:28 AM
#35
Very unfortunate see you lose at the dice game, but gambling is not for people who have a lot of money because gambling is for people who think smart. Looking at your bet history, only lost 7 strike you've run out of money. You may forget in the past there are many people lost 10 strike up to 20 more, so placing bet value and total of bets is very important. Wish you luck in the future, but remember with money you can afford to lose, don't be greedy and keep your emotional stability.

20 losing streak in a martingale method, that would be an insane loss.  But they say that if someone can outlast this martingale losing streak, then it is one of the most profitable strategies in the gambling industry.  But the thing there is the word "if" since the losing streak goes longer as the game run which makes player's bankroll to get depleted sooner than they think.



Gambling is for anyone who wanted to have entertainment but not for everyone if the goal is winning.  Worst is the use of martingale in a limited fund, you will get broke before you know it.
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 531
July 03, 2022, 11:43:55 AM
#34
Very unfortunate see you lose at the dice game, but gambling is not for people who have a lot of money because gambling is for people who think smart. Looking at your bet history, only lost 7 strike you've run out of money. You may forget in the past there are many people lost 10 strike up to 20 more, so placing bet value and total of bets is very important. Wish you luck in the future, but remember with money you can afford to lose, don't be greedy and keep your emotional stability.
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 537
July 03, 2022, 11:12:25 AM
#33
Gambling is for anyone who has funds for it but everyone couldn't be lucky. Even big bag holders could lose a lot if they are not lucky enough. Sometimes, the strategy of others will not work for you so at the beginning of the game, if you feel that a certain strategy is not good for you, you better look for alternatives. There are also luck-based games wherein you can't apply any effective strategy. Just don't bet using funds that you can't afford to lose.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1153
July 03, 2022, 11:10:33 AM
#32
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win.

Then why are small time gambler can still play in every casino?  Besides, I do not think winning has something to do with how much bankroll you have.  Remember dice is a game of chance so no matter how much bankroll one has, he is not certain about winning and losing.

Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.

Is this your first time trying the martingale strategy?  It is well known to most gamblers here that martingale is the best strategy in losing your bankroll.  Depending on the setup, it can deplete a $million bankroll in less than a minute.  So don't blame having a small bankroll rather we should make ourselves aware of the pros and cons of every strategy we are using so that we won't end up frustrated and blame how small our bankroll is.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1338
July 03, 2022, 11:04:54 AM
#31
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.
This is incorrect, martingale is simply a strategy that has been proven to not work over and over again, and even if you had more money than the casino that will still not work because casinos set bet limits in order to counter those which have an incredible amount of funds and would like try the martingale strategy, so as you can see the problem comes from those which have misconceptions about gambling, and that has nothing to do with the size of your wealth.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1196
Reputation first.
July 03, 2022, 10:06:54 AM
#30
Hello everyone,
   I feel sorry for your loss. I imagine is not something easy to see your funds go away so quickly. That's why i would like to use this occasion to ask what do you think is the best playing strategy? For dice games or crashed games. Is there a topic addressing this on this forum?
Thank you in advance for your qualified answers.

I don't think that exists a right strategy when you play at Dice or also at other game, it's only a question of luck. So, play only for fun, because with the every strategy that you want to adapt, you're going to lose your money.

Avoid to adopt this methodics, and play also what you can afford to lose.

hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 530
July 03, 2022, 10:05:19 AM
#29
Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.
I agree with you that the martingale strategy favours those who have money to keep doubling their bets, regardless of losses... but for someone without money the martingale strategy is the surest way of becoming poor. As a gambler before you apply any strategy in gambling, you have to know if it is a strategy designed to work better when you have sufficient capital or not. Don't just apply any strategy thinking it will work, assumptions they say is the mother of all f*ck ups.



That's sad, but we need to come up with our own strategy. I am deeply very sorry if you experienced so much losses, it is not your fault friends, but next time we should learn our own way and take it easy do not take it seriously ,sometimes taking it seriously leads us to too much losses, do not follow other strategy without realizing the consequences behind it.
sr. member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 442
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
July 03, 2022, 09:57:12 AM
#28
Martingale Is a strategy that requires infinite supply and its something that could be a disaster with Just few bets.
Generally speaking...It Is really important to bet only what you can afford to lose.
Well this is true --martingale also is a strategy for the short term only not for a long-term session. The more time you have to spend time the more chances that you will lose. Even though you are a big bag holder or even you are a whale that holding a big fund, if you will stay longer in gambling, it is expected that you will encounter more losses than a win. Sometimes we should not chase our losses, let us take a break and come back when we are ready to gamble martingale could be a profitable way if you will put a stop limit on whether it will win or lose.
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
July 03, 2022, 09:55:40 AM
#27
Hello everyone,
   I feel sorry for your loss. I imagine is not something easy to see your funds go away so quickly. That's why i would like to use this occasion to ask what do you think is the best playing strategy? For dice games or crashed games. Is there a topic addressing this on this forum?
Thank you in advance for your qualified answers.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 379
July 03, 2022, 09:39:11 AM
#26
Gambling is not a game for people who are broke.It was meant for those who have a bouyant source of income,those who can lose a huge sum of money and it won't really mean anything to them.It is meant for those who have great self control,and will not be hypertetic if they  loose money,because they have enough.The moment one goes into gambling without much money,he is likely to have emotional problems when he looses a game.Or in other words he will be unable to handle the issues of lack of money.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3537
Nec Recisa Recedit
July 03, 2022, 09:26:05 AM
#25
Martingale Is a strategy that requires infinite supply and its something that could be a disaster with Just few bets.
Generally speaking...It Is really important to bet only what you can afford to lose.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
July 03, 2022, 09:15:50 AM
#24

After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.



That's a poor alibi I use to justify my losses from using martingale because of a lack of enough funds to chase that winning roll, you really never know if having a big bankroll will cover everything and how big it is to cover it, martingale is an exciting strategy to use but you must understand that you could win but you could also lose, so take out the idea that Gambling is for big bag holders it never was and it never will be.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
July 03, 2022, 08:34:41 AM
#23
Dice games are very often said by gamblers a simple game and luck, it's the dominance of every dice player, many people say that profits can reach a percentage of 90%, very fantastic if lucky.

Honestly, the first time I got involved in gambling, the first game I bet on was craps, but I was always unlucky and unlucky, I think I understand even though dice are lucky, but I believe there are things that must be learned about the secrets of small and large dice, for that to win big.

Seeing what the OP went through, I remember to myself at the time, losing in a row makes me stressed, losing is bigger than winning, that's my time to stop for a moment betting in the dice game, hopefully the OP can be lucky the next day, cheers.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1169
July 03, 2022, 08:05:55 AM
#22
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.


If you are holding more funds you would encounter a much bigger loss, I think it is not your funds were the problem it is the way you are thinking and I think you need to change your mindset first, you are sounding like you are already desperate in winning big money with a martingale strategy I think you surely have a bad approach of things, and right now I think that your emotions on your lost are consuming you a lot, and are now thinking of ways you can return back what you have lost, and thinking that you must have a huge amount of money in getting it back is a bac thinking I think you need to consult an expert about your situation because, in my opinion, you are already succumbed by addiction,

This is just my speculation and pretty much a quick look for an expert for this kind of field would likely help you a lot, I really think you are still not aware of it aswell, and some addicted gamblers would likely not notice it themselves, if not been seen by their family and friends their unusual behavior,

For me my strategy is


  • Always have a minimum amount of money as your gambling budget
  • Have a minimum time in playing with dice of other casino-based games
  • Don't expect to get back what you have lost
  • Play gambling occasionally or with just your free time
  • Win or Loss with your given gambling time always calls it a day and go home
full member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 102
July 03, 2022, 07:55:55 AM
#21
After this experience I believe gambling is for the big bag holders, if you're in urge of making a win. Very much disappointed, because it is the last few dollars I had as a cryptocurrency holding. If I had more funds I wouldn't have encountered this big loss. Martingale once again a failed strategy when you don't have big bag of money.


Yes i agree that when its your last bag of money you are in an urge to win your gamble and that is when you make rash decision and most people lose their money, in this situation the best way is to either don't gamble when ur short on cash or make it as much fun as you can so you won't be disapointed.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1922
Shuffle.com
July 03, 2022, 07:50:15 AM
#20
I have to disagree with the title because most crypto casinos nowadays let you deposit and withdraw smaller amounts. You only say that because of the strategy you're using which isn't suitable for gamblers with small bankrolls. I remember doing the same strategy but for sports betting and eventually lost my bankroll after going through consecutive losses and it's not bad of an experience as it encouraged me to use a different strategy that involves less aggressive bets.
Pages:
Jump to: