Topic: 🤜 GamblingBro.com 🤛 Honest crypto casino reviews ✅ Tested with real deposits ✅ - page 9. (Read 4721 times)

The KYC requirement alone will not attract much gamblers from the forum. There are much reputable sites here that don't require KYC. And taking into account OP's experience, hard to trust your funds on this site. Though they have no withdrawal fees but they are slow in sending it, would you like to wait in vain or just pay some fees to get your funds out? I will choose the latter. Great to see gamblingpro's reviews based on his actual experience, because a lot of review sites are just copying others.

They asked you to make a review of their casino, then they treated you badly! That's really funny. Personally I don't like the KYC process and slow withdrawal system. Wildtornado has received lower points in those sections. Anyway, almost every casino runs deposit promotion with the same concept. Casino sets the wagering requirements in a profitable way for themselves. I think it is reasonable as they are running a business.

However, the 3× wagering requirements on deposit amount is higher than most other casino. And 1× wager requirement is reasonable in that case. I haven't played there before and I will never play there after watching your review. The list of cons are bigger than the list of pros for this casino. BTW, update the first URL of the review, fix it in your main post too.

Wildtornado review is published!

Check out my latest Wildtornado review. This casino has received a 2.1 out of 5 rating from me. Wildtornado is one of the worst casinos that I have ever played at!



Check out the review here

I know at least one crypto poker website, will make a detailed review of it soon

@GamblingBro

I have found an article about poker -crypto on your site and in it I was hoping to see which casinos exist at least regardless of whether they are 100% crypto-poker but you don't mention any.

I understand that live poker playing with a dealer is becoming more and more popular in casinos, but PvP tends to remain in crypto casinos that exist with a downward trend in terms of traffic and even growth, so fiat casinos- Crypto with its regulations are winning the race, in particular what opinion do you have in that sense of the crypto-poker casinos that were looking for a space in this difficult specific area of the world of gambling.

Do you know of a 100% poker project related to the crypto world that is in the making.

Two weeks ago I have received a message from a WildCasino representative:



Today I have finished testing this casino, and guys, this is one of the worst websites that I have ever played at!
The full review will be published in the coming days, meanwhile, I suggest you stay away from WildCasino.

Dividends amount is really low unless you have huge amount of CHIP token as locked. The wagering requirement isn't big for gaining the CHIP tokens and it depends on level. The most interesting fact is that we will receive dividends from each coin as long as the house making profit from those coins. Wagering contests or challenges are common thing in every casino. I think 3 points are enough for rakeback and dividends part. However, it's up to you. You are making the reviews based on your real game play experience. My opinions are a side note for you.

The rakeback was also compensated by the Chips support agent, even though there was a bug and I did not receive it automatically. I think the rakeback right on the start and the dividends deserve two additional points?

Chips.gg now in the first position in your review list by overcoming the rating of Stake.com. Chips received 4 points in promotion part, but Stake received 2 in it. You haven't described much about Stake benefits as you didn't receive anything by playing there. Where you received some CHIP tokens by playing in chips.gg and getting rewards by locking the tokens. You have received nothing else except that. Still they got 4 points out of 5!

BTW, I didn't know Chips.gg have CHIP tokens on their site. I just discovered it through your review and locked my tokens for getting the dividends.

Chips.gg review is published!

Check out my latest Chips.gg review. This casino has received a 3.8 out of 5 rating from me and is now taking first place in the overall leaderboard. Good selection of games, exciting promotions, and instant withdrawals. Although, there are still some things for improvement: the withdrawal fees are too high, there is no welcome offer, and one rakeback-related bug should be fixed.


Check out the review here

I read almost all the reviews and agree with most of them. The reviews are so detailed and you covered everything any gambler may be interested in. Kudos for that!
The only thing I don't agree with is how the total score (final verdict) is calculated. I believe each section must have a different coefficient based on its effect on the user experience. For example, the legitimacy of the casino shouldn't have the same weight as speed of withdrawals.
Reading the introduction on the main page was also both entertaining and informative. I invite everyone to take the time to read it.

You're actually right on this one bro! We do have our own preferences and judgment towards things which there might be things which is good for me but not for others.Im not totally making out some contradiction on a hard way and I did just tell my own personal views too basing on long term experience
with the site.

Well we do have our own will on which site or platform which is really best for us.

Every review you find online represents a personal perspective to some extent. If you don't like it, then you shouldn't read reviews, but facts sheets. 

I personally have no problem with this and enjoy reading other people's opinions about the products and services I use or plan to use in the future. As long as the same standard applies to all websites reviewed, I believe the review is valid. From what I have seen so far, GamblingBro does an excellent job and I find his reviews objective and unbiased. While it's okay to disagree with his set criteria, it is also a matter of personal opinion, right?

If you check the structure of my reviews, then you will find out, that there are 10 different sections that are contributing to the total score, each giving from zero to 0.5 points to the overall rating.
The promotions is not the only thing that is influencing the rating, so there is no need to focus that much on this section.
When making the reviews I am operating with numbers and facts. In terms of promotions, I try to figure out, how profitable are the promos offered by the casino for the players.

Crypto.games has received 2 points for promos, now let's compare it to the casino that got the maximum of 5 points from me in this section - Duelbits (you can check the full review here). Duelbits is offering bits cashback: instant (10% of the house edge), daily, weekly and monthly (5% of the house edge each). Additionally, there are level up rewards and regular races.

Now let's make a side to side comparison.

What games can you play to get rewards?
Crypto.games: Only one game per day
Duelbits: Every game you can find on the website

What should you do to get a reward?
Crypto.games: Find out what are the details of the coming challenge, collect winning bets, post them on forum
Duelbits: Play any games you want and hit one button to get a reward.

How much will you get after wagering 100 dollars?
Crypto.games: No one will tell you. This is what I call luck-based mechanics: you never know how much in bets would be needed to complete the challenge.
Duelbits: If I play 96% RTP slot, then after wagering 100 USD I will get: 4 USD x 10% = 0.4 USD as an instant reward and 0.6 USD more in total for daily, weekly and monthly cashback.

Now you probably understand better, why Crypto.games has 2 points in the promo section and some other casinos might get a better result here. Despite of having 5 points for the promotions, the total rating of Duelbits is 3.4, which is less than 3.5 for Crypto.games. This also illustrates that not the promos only are not deciding what will be the final score.

I try not to make any judgments based on the 'personal kind of view or preference'. I rather try to operate with the facts and numbers.

Luck based mechanics? Its always been like this just like in most gambling sites and it does really work on that way.

So this turns out this is a personal kind of view or preference which it isn't surprising that setting or giving a 3.5 score out of 5
and just like what others mentioned above then its your criteria then you are the ones who will set out. 

I have checked those promotions and mentioned them in the review. There are several things I don't like about them:
1. Each challenge is focused on one single game. This is forcing me to play a game that I might don't like to play at all.
2. I have to manually collect some game history links in order to participate, which is not something I would like to spend my time on
3. Most of the challenges have luck-based mechanics, which does not guarantee you any winnings at all. I prefer straightforward promotions - you get a certain reward for a certain amount wagered.

Do not expect to see high score, most of the reviewed casinos by GamblingBro get an average 3.5 out of 5.
GamblingBro has their own criteria to decide the score as they wish based on some aspects.
Because the score comes from personal opinion so we cant influence them as we have different preferences about each scoring category.

I agree with most of your points, but I disagree with some parts like games availability and promotions. Crypto.Games provides some of the most popular gambling games with low house edge.

It is true that games by 3rd party providers are missing, but the minority actually play them. Also, there are regular promotions offered on their forum(https://forum.crypto.games/). Another pro is their super fast rolls in Dice.

You are definitely right on this one but it cant really be just avoided that you wouldn't really make any reactions if you do know that the certain site that had been reviewed should really be having much higher rating.

Well, we do really have  that personal review and since its his site then its up to him whatever things he would be putting into,

For sure there would be several people who would really be going against with this review or rating. 

Really nicely written reviews and I enjoyed how thorough you were with each area of the sites.

Good job.