hope you'll not gettin mad about my screens here, but all of them must be collected for posterity...
nah everyone likes a good laugh out of HT
so basically the good news can be summed up in one word SOON
Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1107. (Read 3377956 times)
March 25, 2015, 05:58:18 PM
nah everyone likes a good laugh out of HT
so basically the good news can be summed up in one word SOON
March 25, 2015, 05:49:34 PM
"Darn those hackers, selling XPY from the Paycoin Foundation's wallet and depositing the BTC into addresses for which Matlack and I in absolutely no way have the private keys. Darn them to heck!"
(Hear that, SEC and FBI? We don't have the money. Totally stolen. Darn hackers.)
(Hear that, SEC and FBI? We don't have the money. Totally stolen. Darn hackers.)
March 25, 2015, 05:48:11 PM
Garza needs to be put away and quickly. If not in jail then a lunatic asylum.
March 25, 2015, 05:46:38 PM
hope you'll not gettin mad about my screens here, but all of them must be collected for posterity...
March 25, 2015, 05:44:06 PM
http://coinfire.io/2015/03/25/paycoin-foundation-adam-matlack-under-us-investigation/
That is some very very very serious shit.That is a search warrant, does not get any worse than that. Quick checking Google's Privacy Policy, takes serious shit just got real for them to keel over and hand them this information. Good Luck to the so-called "Paycoin Foundation" and all its minions, your lives are about to become living hell. It was all fun and games early on until real people are getting hurt....
https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/userdatarequests/legalprocess/#what_does_google_do
Quote
What's the difference between a subpoena, a search warrant and a court order under ECPA?
...[snip]...
Search Warrant
The threshold is higher still for an ECPA search warrant. To obtain one, a government agency must make a request to a judge or magistrate and meet a relatively high burden of proof: demonstrating "probable cause" to believe that contraband or certain information related to a crime is presently in the specific place to be searched. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things being sought. It can be used to compel the disclosure of the same information as an ECPA subpoena or court order—but also a user's search query information and private content stored in a Google Account, such as Gmail messages, documents, photos and YouTube videos. An ECPA search warrant is available only in criminal investigations. The video below provides an overview of how we review and respond to ECPA search warrants.
...[snip]...
Search Warrant
The threshold is higher still for an ECPA search warrant. To obtain one, a government agency must make a request to a judge or magistrate and meet a relatively high burden of proof: demonstrating "probable cause" to believe that contraband or certain information related to a crime is presently in the specific place to be searched. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things being sought. It can be used to compel the disclosure of the same information as an ECPA subpoena or court order—but also a user's search query information and private content stored in a Google Account, such as Gmail messages, documents, photos and YouTube videos. An ECPA search warrant is available only in criminal investigations. The video below provides an overview of how we review and respond to ECPA search warrants.
So, look for all his web sites to go off line soon as they get collected up in search warrants... paycoin... tried to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear... but just ended up the investors' silk road to the court room steps. AND, you really have to wonder what his non-US investors think of all of this? I can't imagine them taking too kindly to the guy gutting them for tens of thousands of dollars based on absolute lies. You'd think they'd want a piece of his hide.
March 25, 2015, 05:41:33 PM
I'm so glad I dumped this crap before I got burned even more. Again those damn "HACKERS" attacking this wonderful coin, lol.
March 25, 2015, 05:32:38 PM
http://coinfire.io/2015/03/25/paycoin-foundation-adam-matlack-under-us-investigation/
That is some very very very serious shit.That is a search warrant, does not get any worse than that. Quick checking Google's Privacy Policy, takes serious shit just got real for them to keel over and hand them this information. Good Luck to the so-called "Paycoin Foundation" and all its minions, your lives are about to become living hell. It was all fun and games early on until real people started getting hurt....
https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/userdatarequests/legalprocess/#what_does_google_do
Quote
What's the difference between a subpoena, a search warrant and a court order under ECPA?
And what information can a government agency get from Google with each?
It's complex, but here's a summary of the different forms of legal process covered by ECPA:
Subpoena
Of the three types of ECPA legal process for stored information, the subpoena has the lowest threshold for a government agency to obtain. In many jurisdictions, including the federal system, there is no requirement that a judge or magistrate review a subpoena before the government can issue it. A government agency can use a subpoena to compel Google to disclose only specific types of information listed in the statute. For example, a valid subpoena for your Gmail address could compel us to disclose the name that you listed when creating the account, and the IP addresses from which you created the account and signed in and signed out (with dates and times). Subpoenas can be used by the government in both criminal and civil cases.
On its face, ECPA seems to allow a government agency to compel a communications provider to disclose the content of certain types of emails and other content with a subpoena or an ECPA court order (described below). But Google requires an ECPA search warrant for contents of Gmail and other services based on the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable search and seizure.
ECPA Court Order
Unlike an ECPA subpoena, obtaining an ECPA court order requires judicial review. To receive an ECPA court order, a government agency must present specific facts to a judge or magistrate demonstrating that the requested information is relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.
With such a court order, a government agency can obtain the same information as a subpoena, plus more detailed information about the use of the account. This could include the IP address associated with a particular email sent from that account or used to change the account password (with dates and times), and the non-content portion of email headers such as the "from," "to" and "date" fields. An ECPA court order is available only for criminal investigations.
Search Warrant
The threshold is higher still for an ECPA search warrant. To obtain one, a government agency must make a request to a judge or magistrate and meet a relatively high burden of proof: demonstrating "probable cause" to believe that contraband or certain information related to a crime is presently in the specific place to be searched. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things being sought. It can be used to compel the disclosure of the same information as an ECPA subpoena or court order—but also a user's search query information and private content stored in a Google Account, such as Gmail messages, documents, photos and YouTube videos. An ECPA search warrant is available only in criminal investigations. The video below provides an overview of how we review and respond to ECPA search warrants.
And what information can a government agency get from Google with each?
It's complex, but here's a summary of the different forms of legal process covered by ECPA:
Subpoena
Of the three types of ECPA legal process for stored information, the subpoena has the lowest threshold for a government agency to obtain. In many jurisdictions, including the federal system, there is no requirement that a judge or magistrate review a subpoena before the government can issue it. A government agency can use a subpoena to compel Google to disclose only specific types of information listed in the statute. For example, a valid subpoena for your Gmail address could compel us to disclose the name that you listed when creating the account, and the IP addresses from which you created the account and signed in and signed out (with dates and times). Subpoenas can be used by the government in both criminal and civil cases.
On its face, ECPA seems to allow a government agency to compel a communications provider to disclose the content of certain types of emails and other content with a subpoena or an ECPA court order (described below). But Google requires an ECPA search warrant for contents of Gmail and other services based on the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable search and seizure.
ECPA Court Order
Unlike an ECPA subpoena, obtaining an ECPA court order requires judicial review. To receive an ECPA court order, a government agency must present specific facts to a judge or magistrate demonstrating that the requested information is relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.
With such a court order, a government agency can obtain the same information as a subpoena, plus more detailed information about the use of the account. This could include the IP address associated with a particular email sent from that account or used to change the account password (with dates and times), and the non-content portion of email headers such as the "from," "to" and "date" fields. An ECPA court order is available only for criminal investigations.
Search Warrant
The threshold is higher still for an ECPA search warrant. To obtain one, a government agency must make a request to a judge or magistrate and meet a relatively high burden of proof: demonstrating "probable cause" to believe that contraband or certain information related to a crime is presently in the specific place to be searched. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things being sought. It can be used to compel the disclosure of the same information as an ECPA subpoena or court order—but also a user's search query information and private content stored in a Google Account, such as Gmail messages, documents, photos and YouTube videos. An ECPA search warrant is available only in criminal investigations. The video below provides an overview of how we review and respond to ECPA search warrants.
March 25, 2015, 05:31:26 PM
Oh, the imaginary hack stage. They must really be feeling the pressure. IIRC, fictional hacks come just before disappearance.
What day will Garza go poof? I'm guessing April 1st will be his last day. I don't think he'll stop once hashtalk is shut down, though he's certainly set it up so he can.
What day will Garza go poof? I'm guessing April 1st will be his last day. I don't think he'll stop once hashtalk is shut down, though he's certainly set it up so he can.
March 25, 2015, 05:27:19 PM
i never saw that much of stupidity and heavy disability concentrated in one post.
Smoking bacon is known to have severe effects on higher cognitive function and perception of reality. Right up there with PCP and Bath Salts.
March 25, 2015, 05:25:37 PM
i never saw that much of stupidity and heavy disability concentrated in one post.
March 25, 2015, 05:21:43 PM
gonzo at its best. SOON!
What? Thieves don't Hodl? Nevermind that the most likely scenario is that this was either an inside job or that there actually was no theft at all (most likely IMO). Just a way to delay the release of the cashtaker coins until they can squeeze out some more BTC and then leave the market in tatters when the XPY is finally delivered.
March 25, 2015, 05:21:19 PM
gonzo at its best. SOON!
I've posted this several times but this time I mean it.
Ladies and Gentlemen Mister Doctor Ron Paul
March 25, 2015, 05:18:36 PM
gonzo at its best. SOON!
Reading that makes me sick.
March 25, 2015, 05:15:34 PM
gonzo at its best. SOON!
March 25, 2015, 05:07:40 PM
Is this yet another "Bitcoin scandal" or should we leave poor old BTC out of it? 
March 25, 2015, 05:06:31 PM
sure, just talk friendly to the SEC. maybe you'll get some warm milk too.
My sides are in orbit sir. He's clearly off his face on the kool-aid.
March 25, 2015, 05:02:20 PM
I don't follow GAW/Paycoin for anything other than the comedy gold and lulz, but what is the significance of owning all 15 prime controllers ?
Doesn't that sort of defeat the purpose of decentralization ? Was XPY never supposed to be decentralized to begin with ? Am I making a bad guess at what "prime controllers" are supposed to be ?
Doesn't that sort of defeat the purpose of decentralization ? Was XPY never supposed to be decentralized to begin with ? Am I making a bad guess at what "prime controllers" are supposed to be ?
This ^.
Keep in mind though that Prime Controllers are just wallets with extra staking percentage (up to 350%). They don't really centralize or decentralize anything, but the premine controlled by GAW is what makes it centralized.
Prime Controllers are just money printing machines, cherry on top of the premine.
March 25, 2015, 04:57:06 PM
Federal authorities are using a full arrsenal of subpoenas, warrants, and other legal means to obtain additional information as investigators prepare a criminal case against Mr. Garza and several of his associates. In addition, a civil case investigation is also underway against Mr. Garza due to what agencies believe is wrongdoing regarding money laundering from individuals on banking watch lists.
Just from this paragraph I get.
☑ Wire fraud.
☑ Money laundering that may have affected a financial institution.
That right there is enough to keep you up at night.
Just from this paragraph I get.
☑ Wire fraud.
☑ Money laundering that may have affected a financial institution.
That right there is enough to keep you up at night.
March 25, 2015, 04:56:57 PM
I don't follow GAW/Paycoin for anything other than the comedy gold and lulz, but what is the significance of owning all 15 prime controllers ?
Doesn't that sort of defeat the purpose of decentralization ? Was XPY never supposed to be decentralized to begin with ? Am I making a bad guess at what "prime controllers" are supposed to be ?
Doesn't that sort of defeat the purpose of decentralization ? Was XPY never supposed to be decentralized to begin with ? Am I making a bad guess at what "prime controllers" are supposed to be ?
wow just wow. he just cant stop lying. time to dig archive.today link for the emails where he talks about this 
edit: ahh here is one of the emails
https://archive.today/qKW22
edit: ahh here is one of the emails
https://archive.today/qKW22
March 25, 2015, 04:52:31 PM
This shit-story keeps getting stranger by the day, check this crazy shit out... LOL.
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/302wa7/theory_josh_garza_verto/
LOL. Was almost sorta semi believable until here:
Quote
By reckoning, Josh Garza is the only suspect presented in the quest to unmask Verto that is even remotely qualified from a technical standpoint to have pulled the Evolution heist.
Homeros skills are pretty much limited to gaining people's trust and lying, and he is a piss poor liar. I guess being able to bamboozle people into thinking you're a trustworthy person goes a long ways towards papering over being a poor liar.
Not that Homero has not hired some competent people to do some things in the past, so it is of course still possible.
Jump to: