Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1150. (Read 3377956 times)

Why would that surprise you?  It's also obvious that it's more than a similar moderator style, the two forums are owned, operated, and moderated by the same exact people - people that are not interested in having their scam, or their connections to one another, exposed.

The fascists who call themselves "administrators" and "moderators" on Paycointalk banned another one of my accounts from posting there. I was polite, I asked questions, I critisized the Coinstand pump'n'dump - and they don't like that. It's so obvious that Paycointalk is run in the very same way as the GAW shill forum Hashtalk.

Seems to be down again.  No telling how long it's for this time.  maybe minutes, maybe forever.

The ignore button works wonders.

I think these 2 lines from my website are valid to disproving you're theory that i am  " Ripping People off "   Its called supply and demand.  The last few months have proven there is a demand and that people dont care ponzi or not and are willing to bet this way.    As long as users are informed there is nothing ethically or morally wrong with this.  

About Us.
We are a Ponzi all of the games found here are Built on the basic foundation of a Ponzi Scheme Your funds are Considered a Bet Not a Investment. We are not a group of magical market masters who use the bitcoin orical locked in our basemant that guarantee's we 175% roi every coin we touch


OUR PROCESS.

We use your deposit to payout the User's before you 175% Of their Deposit. Afterwards your deposit Is added to the waiting list. Then If and when we receive enough to pay all Waiting Bets before yours & reach your payout threshold. Your deposit will then become a winner and we and we will Immediately return 175% of your deposit to the same address that sent the deposit. In all of our games there is a risk of loss. We encourage the user to cautious when betting and never risk more then he or she can afford to lose. This is a Gamble

I think the makes it pretty clear that Betters on my site are well informed and willing participants.

Is Hashtalk gone or down again, figured this might happen before the coin dump, if people are allowed to remove from Zen.

Yes, you should know about ripping people off dipshit!
And have a link to another Ponzi scam again in your sig, your worse then GAW.
Have you moved up to BTC and ripping people off?
What a Hell tool.

Not biting, sorry. If you have anything to answer specifically in my post, e.g. proof of GAW manually (not via APIs, which is common sense) updating their catalog, or Amazon allowing (which is against common sense) GAW to use their property, maybe we can continue this. Otherwise I'm done with you. Bye.

I'm waiting for the "at one point 500.000 orders were made each minute" and "the beta money is almost gone" posts.
soon.

Just answering your post and sharing my plan to "get a life".


Relevance?

Once again.... Relevance?

The links I posted were all talking just about the claim I made. You linked to a long document about many other things. Do you not see the difference?

And if they are selling Amazon products, then Amazon is getting profit from this.

(Where does automation come into the picture? Or rather, why would generating the site using automation be worse than manually copying links?)

Except If you click the link and read it.   You would see that nobody is ripped off and very well informed.   That anyone who would have participated was a informed and willing participant.

Thats not ripping people off.   

Yeah, I was thinking about creating a ponzi site and ripping tools like you off. Is that a good business plan you think?

Or you could just use common sense. No sane online retailer, and certainly not one of the scale of Amazon would allow scraping their website (i.e. wasting their bandwidth etc) and let someone else to pocket the profit. No website boasting "millions" of products can be created from scratch in a few weeks without using some sort of automation. So the burden of proof is and always was on you, instead you choose - again - to run around looking for someone to do your job. Posting links to blogs but requiring others to quote specific excerpts and links to case law. Hypocrite.

 Like i said to u 40 pages ago.   it wouldnt matter if gaw fufil'd all their promises you would never stop.    GET A LIFE!

Not even man enough to admin the whole purpose of this thread is nothing more the sabotage.   Its not even working :/

At the end of the day the whole GawStand (oops I mean Coin Stand) fiasco will end the same way as every other GAW site. The coin will never stay constantly over $1 for a period longer then a month.

The thing is enough people still listen for or watch everything GAW, Josh makes an announcement and the price moves, and no it can't just be the hard core faithful buying as the 10 or so left would not have the buying power to make the market move and trade as it did Yesterday, the No 1 most traded alt coin for the day with over 300K in trades or 1100 BTC.

So the funny thing is every one calls scam but still trades on the hope that GAW will make them rich

Amazon is in the business of moving product. That's what they do.Thats what they care about the most.
Why would they want to shut down something that helps them to do this and does not incur bank charges?

If there isn't evidence whether or not they are using the affiliate program, then it seems quite premature to say that coinstand is definitely violating terms of the affiliate program. My claim all along was that reselling regularly didn't appear to violate the regular tos. I'm no longer so sure about that; as I said above it appears a little ambiguous.

I never said that it doesn't violate the affiliate terms, just that those terms don't necessarily apply.

"Where did I make that claim that you're ascribing to me here?" You linked directly to the regular terms.
Then that all depends on whether they violate the tos or not. I was mentioning the legal aspect because other people claimed that it was illegal under the dmca, to which I replied that even if that was the case, they would need to sue. If it was against the terms (which I'm no longer so sure about), they could shut the account.

Hmmmm, Close, but no cigar....

http://www.newschannel10.com/story/28405931/update-fugitive-file-joshua-ryan-garza-in-custody