SOURCES: http://archive.today/4kT43
http://pastebin.com/fqqig5ECJosh Garza/Joe Mordica exchanges 2/11/2015 – 2/14/2015EXCERPTS – PART 2 OF 4 – 2/12/2015: [rearranged chronologically by timestamp]
On Feb 12, 2015 1:21 AM, "Joe Mordica" <
[email protected]> wrote:
Did you even read the message?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Josh Garza <
[email protected]> wrote:
Joe,
Let's talk about action.
So far, my action has been to stick with things to make sure our staff have a job and our customers are successful.
Yours have been to be disingenuous about time frame on when you would be leaving, what you would complete before you moved on, and most recently, an attempt to blackmail the company.
You have such a huge moral resolve that you feel compelled to write that you were "asked to do something wrong" . Yet, you will only release that if you don't get paid an arbitrary amount of money?
An amount that exceeds what you are even contractually owed to begin with.
But.... your willing to write a nice "public statement" if you do get paid?
Imagine what the public will think? The best part, is your attorney was bright enough to put it all in writing......
Not to mention, the "press release" is a lie to begin with and it's easy for me to prove.
You seem to forget the part where your last email said "We BOTH agreed not to move forward". You should also take a look at the previous emails on that chain, as they don't sound like a guy "not wanting" to do something.....
Not withstanding, there are plenty of emails floating around my inbox showing what you have been "comfortable" with in the past.
We are in the process of hiring a litigation firm to bring legal action against you for attempting to blackmail our company out of money and violating your NDA.
To date, we have already offered you more than you are contractually entitled to (as an act of good faith)
Like I said in my email the other day, make sure this is the path you want to go down. Once I bring these guys on retainer, there is not going back.
Despite the appalling nature of your "negotiation tactics" and the bridges you have burned, I am more than willing to provide you what we contractually agreed on and move on.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Josh Garza <
[email protected]> wrote:
Joe, I want to focus on getting things resolved and move on. Not debate about how things are said.
Sent from my mobile phone
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Josh Garza <
[email protected]> wrote:
We are willing to offer the stock you are owed. I have to check, but it may have already been issued. Should that be the case, this whole thing would be a moot point.
In addition, the revenue stream from the customer base that was what you provided for the stock.
In other words, you would be getting your company back and keep your stock.
The alternative was outlined in the email I sent last.
Sent from my mobile phone
On Feb 12, 2015 4:39 PM, "Joe Mordica" <
[email protected]> wrote:
Seems as if this is a one way conversation still (I was hoping to have a real dialogue but understand that may not be possible). A conversation is the exchange of "both" parties address points/ideas and not only one party. "Action" withstanding thought carries little weight/substance in any scenario (especially when forming a business plan in one day and putting it into "action" the next).
Try this: Next time you receive an email from someone you respect/respected who's feedback requires some time to think before responding, take a few hours before actually responding. It will help both parties have an actual conversation instead of a pissing battle which is derived from only emotional thoughts.
Please review my last message. I addressed your points and hardly asked a real question of my own, yet you avoid my points almost entirely and continue to hurl all of your keyboard. It's fine to bring up new topics but read over your email before sending (or have someone else).
BTW, to your point of offering more than I was contracted. What you offered me was an unprofitable business with angry customers that are not being supported. You don't have the technical resources to run the company or the money to buy any. This is the "easiest" offering (if you want to call it that) which I actually agreed to accept if you look at the last proposal from us.
On Feb 12, 2015 5:02 PM, "Joe Mordica" <
[email protected]> wrote:
1. Do you plan to make right on financial promises not contracted?
2. Do you plan to counter my most recent proposal involving the VoIP company?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Joe Mordica <
[email protected]> wrote:
As you know, the stock is really worth nothing at this point (but I will need proof as to whether or not it even exists). When will you know this by?
Other recipients:
[email protected]Images are not displayed
Display images in this post
I think that would be smart.
I was just thinking about this. The longer we drag this out, the more it will cost both of us.
I have been thinking about a few solutions (in good faith). Prob the best one I have come up with so far, would be to give you a prime controller. (emphasis mine)
