Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 130. (Read 3377790 times)
November 04, 2016, 10:41:59 PM
I wish I had insiders
November 04, 2016, 10:35:47 PM
No, @rdewilde, no one is trying to make themselves "look better" to you or anyone else here, duh!
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
You are jumping strange conclusions.
Bitpop's assumption was wrong, and there's no way he could ever know, so to me that's a fair reason to jump in - and has nothing to do with what you say. I don't let people talk shit about me, do you?
I post close to factual information that the lawsuit is not dropped - and I get attacked in return - why do you need to argue any of this? Pure nonsense.
Feel free to response, but personally I like to go back ONtopic instead of personal attacking!
Do not take Bitpop aka. Bitbop too seriously. He and Suchmoon have been doing damage control and/or spreading disinfo for these scammers for years.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4058486
I just read the thread you linked. You have a strange sense of entitlement if you think that sending someone $50 worth of LTC entitles you to a $135 refund. They held the coin (or even sold it right away), and held the risk. You don't get a risk free profit anywhere in life.
Plus, the guy did work for you. You can't give him back his time.
Why are you in this thread?
You missed the point I was making about Bitpop/ Bitbop and his insider cryptofiat scum friend(s) who have fucked the cryptomovement.
My beef with that Craptsy inhouse shitcoin cloner muddafuuda is a side note.
Please do your research.
November 04, 2016, 10:01:32 PM
Hah! Lotsa luck, GAWSuit.
Wait until the SEC gets their hands on Garbanzo.
Wait until the SEC gets their hands on Garbanzo.
November 04, 2016, 10:00:00 PM
I have been shocked at every turn in this saga about how people could be smart enough to have money but dumb enough to lose it to garza, but Garza being able to fuck Fraser is still unbelievable to me.
November 04, 2016, 09:57:44 PM
I guess Garza must be penniless &/or Allen is giving up on the alleged "offshore accounts."
$20 million in hookers & blow.
SMH
November 04, 2016, 09:53:12 PM
Just did a quick check in the original complaint, this isn't in it. In fact I don't recall seeing this in the emails, not that I read every single one of them though. Seems rather intimate details maybe someone....provided them with it? Specially the child aspect.
Quote
. Fraser’s wife made him a book that listed the four
people Fraser was closest to for Fraser’s 50th birthday. The book listed Garza as one of those individuals.
In another instance, Garza told Fraser he was having a child. Fraser expressed anger and concern over
Garza’s decision and questioned whether Garza would continue to devote adequate time to their business
ventures.
people Fraser was closest to for Fraser’s 50th birthday. The book listed Garza as one of those individuals.
In another instance, Garza told Fraser he was having a child. Fraser expressed anger and concern over
Garza’s decision and questioned whether Garza would continue to devote adequate time to their business
ventures.
I never heard of this either. Must be part of what Garza told the lawyers in exchange for dismissing him from the lawsuit.
PLOT TWIST: HOMERO WAS THE GOOD GUY ALL ALONG, STU IS THE REAL EVIL
November 04, 2016, 09:45:41 PM
Just did a quick check in the original complaint, this isn't in it. In fact I don't recall seeing this in the emails, not that I read every single one of them though. Seems rather intimate details maybe someone....provided them with it? Specially the child aspect.
Quote
. Fraser’s wife made him a book that listed the four
people Fraser was closest to for Fraser’s 50th birthday. The book listed Garza as one of those individuals.
In another instance, Garza told Fraser he was having a child. Fraser expressed anger and concern over
Garza’s decision and questioned whether Garza would continue to devote adequate time to their business
ventures.
people Fraser was closest to for Fraser’s 50th birthday. The book listed Garza as one of those individuals.
In another instance, Garza told Fraser he was having a child. Fraser expressed anger and concern over
Garza’s decision and questioned whether Garza would continue to devote adequate time to their business
ventures.
November 04, 2016, 09:36:46 PM
well if i were 2 pick 2 legendary posters on bitcointalk to take seriously, it would be suchmoon and bitpop hands down.
and if i were to pick one legendary poster who is a complete nutter (tho entertaining at times)
well I'll give you three guesses and the 1st 2 dont count..... hint... he just showed up in this thread
and if i were to pick one legendary poster who is a complete nutter (tho entertaining at times)
well I'll give you three guesses and the 1st 2 dont count..... hint... he just showed up in this thread
Suchmoon always comes before me, she's the best
November 04, 2016, 09:35:28 PM
Yikes! 
That revised complaint paints quite the picture of Uncle Stu's control. Not even a thin coat, a solid 3 coater plus primer. All true too. Don't know how he will wiggle out of this new picture.
That revised complaint paints quite the picture of Uncle Stu's control. Not even a thin coat, a solid 3 coater plus primer. All true too. Don't know how he will wiggle out of this new picture.
November 04, 2016, 08:46:45 PM
Amended complaint:
https://www.docdroid.net/cYzr1WL/govuscourtsctd112576570.pdf.html
It's bizarre that they dismissed Garza but still refer to him as the main perp while accusing Fraser of "controlling" him. And this:
... as if Homero is cooperating with the plaintiffs and throwing Stu under the bus? I haven't read all of it though so not sure what else has changed from the original.
https://www.docdroid.net/cYzr1WL/govuscourtsctd112576570.pdf.html
It's bizarre that they dismissed Garza but still refer to him as the main perp while accusing Fraser of "controlling" him. And this:
Quote
Based on counsel’s investigation, research and review of publicly available documents, plaintiffs’ personal knowledge, discussions with Homero Joshua Garza (“Garza”), and upon information and belief, plaintiffs allege as follows:
... as if Homero is cooperating with the plaintiffs and throwing Stu under the bus? I haven't read all of it though so not sure what else has changed from the original.
November 04, 2016, 08:36:59 PM
well if i were 2 pick 2 legendary posters on bitcointalk to take seriously, it would be suchmoon and bitpop hands down.
and if i were to pick one legendary poster who is a complete nutter (tho entertaining at times)
well I'll give you three guesses and the 1st 2 dont count..... hint... he just showed up in this thread
and if i were to pick one legendary poster who is a complete nutter (tho entertaining at times)
well I'll give you three guesses and the 1st 2 dont count..... hint... he just showed up in this thread
November 04, 2016, 08:11:10 PM
He's a mental case, just put him on ignore like I have.
November 04, 2016, 08:10:02 PM
No, @rdewilde, no one is trying to make themselves "look better" to you or anyone else here, duh!
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
You are jumping strange conclusions.
Bitpop's assumption was wrong, and there's no way he could ever know, so to me that's a fair reason to jump in - and has nothing to do with what you say. I don't let people talk shit about me, do you?
I post close to factual information that the lawsuit is not dropped - and I get attacked in return - why do you need to argue any of this? Pure nonsense.
Feel free to response, but personally I like to go back ONtopic instead of personal attacking!
Do not take Bitpop aka. Bitbop too seriously. He and Suchmoon have been doing damage control and/or spreading disinfo for these scammers for years.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4058486
I just read the thread you linked. You have a strange sense of entitlement if you think that sending someone $50 worth of LTC entitles you to a $135 refund. They held the coin (or even sold it right away), and held the risk. You don't get a risk free profit anywhere in life.
Plus, the guy did work for you. You can't give him back his time.
Why are you in this thread?
He's stalking me for calling him out
November 04, 2016, 12:07:30 PM
No, @rdewilde, no one is trying to make themselves "look better" to you or anyone else here, duh!
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
You are jumping strange conclusions.
Bitpop's assumption was wrong, and there's no way he could ever know, so to me that's a fair reason to jump in - and has nothing to do with what you say. I don't let people talk shit about me, do you?
I post close to factual information that the lawsuit is not dropped - and I get attacked in return - why do you need to argue any of this? Pure nonsense.
Feel free to response, but personally I like to go back ONtopic instead of personal attacking!
Do not take Bitpop aka. Bitbop too seriously. He and Suchmoon have been doing damage control and/or spreading disinfo for these scammers for years.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4058486
I just read the thread you linked. You have a strange sense of entitlement if you think that sending someone $50 worth of LTC entitles you to a $135 refund. They held the coin (or even sold it right away), and held the risk. You don't get a risk free profit anywhere in life.
Plus, the guy did work for you. You can't give him back his time.
Why are you in this thread?
November 04, 2016, 03:33:57 AM
No, @rdewilde, no one is trying to make themselves "look better" to you or anyone else here, duh!
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
You are jumping strange conclusions.
Bitpop's assumption was wrong, and there's no way he could ever know, so to me that's a fair reason to jump in - and has nothing to do with what you say. I don't let people talk shit about me, do you?
I post close to factual information that the lawsuit is not dropped - and I get attacked in return - why do you need to argue any of this? Pure nonsense.
Feel free to response, but personally I like to go back ONtopic instead of personal attacking!
Do not take Bitpop aka. Bitbop too seriously. He and Suchmoon have been doing damage control and/or spreading disinfo for these scammers for years.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4058486
November 03, 2016, 08:34:38 PM
Is there anything interesting in the minutes of the Judge's reason for accepting this teleconference now?
Unfortunately document #55 is not on PACER.
#56 is here: https://www.docdroid.net/qpEM8LA/govuscourtsctd112576560.pdf.html
November 03, 2016, 08:14:27 PM
Is there anything interesting in the minutes of the Judge's reason for accepting this teleconference now?
One minute its be there or else.AND WEAR YOUR IDENTIFICATION AND BE THERE ON TIME. No delays under our Connecticut delay law or else. Next minute total capitulation and some half-assed skype session.
What do the minutes suggest about this? Some serious fuckery going on, SEC vs. Homero delayed 30 days, this, half measure readily accepted by the judge. What the fuck is next. Shinners doesn't seem too concerned happily playing with his ZEC miner hardware while all this is taking place. Meanwhile where the hell is Homero, not a squeak out of that piece of shit anywhere, no facebook, forums, nothing. Extended family seem jovial and content in their daily facebook bullshit. The only one with the screws being tightened is Uncle Stul.
You are correct. There must be a serious effort to wipe Homero and Stuart from the internet because there is not a trace of either. Wish there was someone local that could show up to these court dates and report back to us whats going on. Quote
Wednesday, November 02, 2016
56 order Order Wed 5:01 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court approves the parties' Rule 26(f) report and adopts the dates proposed by the parties in their Rule 26(f) report with the exceptions set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/2/2016. (Howard, H.)
55 minutes Status Conference Wed 12:44 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Michael P. Shea: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/2/2016. 15 minutes(Court Reporter Marshall.) (Johnson, D.)
56 order Order Wed 5:01 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court approves the parties' Rule 26(f) report and adopts the dates proposed by the parties in their Rule 26(f) report with the exceptions set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/2/2016. (Howard, H.)
55 minutes Status Conference Wed 12:44 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Michael P. Shea: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/2/2016. 15 minutes(Court Reporter Marshall.) (Johnson, D.)
One minute its be there or else.AND WEAR YOUR IDENTIFICATION AND BE THERE ON TIME. No delays under our Connecticut delay law or else. Next minute total capitulation and some half-assed skype session.
What do the minutes suggest about this? Some serious fuckery going on, SEC vs. Homero delayed 30 days, this, half measure readily accepted by the judge. What the fuck is next. Shinners doesn't seem too concerned happily playing with his ZEC miner hardware while all this is taking place. Meanwhile where the hell is Homero, not a squeak out of that piece of shit anywhere, no facebook, forums, nothing. Extended family seem jovial and content in their daily facebook bullshit. The only one with the screws being tightened is Uncle Stul.
November 03, 2016, 06:48:26 PM
Is there anything interesting in the minutes of the Judge's reason for accepting this teleconference now?
One minute its be there or else.AND WEAR YOUR IDENTIFICATION AND BE THERE ON TIME. No delays under our Connecticut delay law or else. Next minute total capitulation and some half-assed skype session.
What do the minutes suggest about this? Some serious fuckery going on, SEC vs. Homero delayed 30 days, this, half measure readily accepted by the judge. What the fuck is next. Shinners doesn't seem too concerned happily playing with his ZEC miner hardware while all this is taking place. Meanwhile where the hell is Homero, not a squeak out of that piece of shit anywhere, no facebook, forums, nothing. Extended family seem jovial and content in their daily facebook bullshit. The only one with the screws being tightened is Uncle Stul.
Quote
Wednesday, November 02, 2016
56 order Order Wed 5:01 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court approves the parties' Rule 26(f) report and adopts the dates proposed by the parties in their Rule 26(f) report with the exceptions set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/2/2016. (Howard, H.)
55 minutes Status Conference Wed 12:44 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Michael P. Shea: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/2/2016. 15 minutes(Court Reporter Marshall.) (Johnson, D.)
56 order Order Wed 5:01 PM
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court approves the parties' Rule 26(f) report and adopts the dates proposed by the parties in their Rule 26(f) report with the exceptions set forth in the attached. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/2/2016. (Howard, H.)
55 minutes Status Conference Wed 12:44 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Michael P. Shea: Telephonic Status Conference held on 11/2/2016. 15 minutes(Court Reporter Marshall.) (Johnson, D.)
One minute its be there or else.AND WEAR YOUR IDENTIFICATION AND BE THERE ON TIME. No delays under our Connecticut delay law or else. Next minute total capitulation and some half-assed skype session.
What do the minutes suggest about this? Some serious fuckery going on, SEC vs. Homero delayed 30 days, this, half measure readily accepted by the judge. What the fuck is next. Shinners doesn't seem too concerned happily playing with his ZEC miner hardware while all this is taking place. Meanwhile where the hell is Homero, not a squeak out of that piece of shit anywhere, no facebook, forums, nothing. Extended family seem jovial and content in their daily facebook bullshit. The only one with the screws being tightened is Uncle Stul.
November 03, 2016, 06:25:22 PM
Well then I suggest you quit accusing long-time members here of posting their info & opinions to try to "look better."
November 03, 2016, 05:49:53 PM
No, @rdewilde, no one is trying to make themselves "look better" to you or anyone else here, duh!
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
The question is, why do you insist on making yourself look so stupid?
You are jumping strange conclusions.
Bitpop's assumption was wrong, and there's no way he could ever know, so to me that's a fair reason to jump in - and has nothing to do with what you say. I don't let people talk shit about me, do you?
I post close to factual information that the lawsuit is not dropped - and I get attacked in return - why do you need to argue any of this? Pure nonsense.
Feel free to response, but personally I like to go back ONtopic instead of personal attacking!
Jump to: