Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1365. (Read 3377922 times)

Back to cloud mining, where the real $ is at... 

https://hashtalk.org/topic/32149/state-of-the-union-issues-programs/3

Cringeworthy. Does he even get that they are making fun of him?

I would shop Jonash's face onto this if I didn't suck at Photoshop.

I would shop Jonash's face onto this if I didn't suck at Photoshop.

https://i.imgur.com/SoXNH17.jpg

Its being build now u gauise Im so super cereal!

Nope, GAWs TOS are not valid. They made changes w/o telling people and giving you a reasonable time to opt out.

Also, whats the point is having a lawsuit against a company with no money?

-Dave

If you were ever a customer of GAW you cannot be a participant in a class action lawsuit. Part of their terms of service and the Supreme Court has upheld class action prohibitions in terms of service. Was a case against AT&T.

Josh Garza
2A, rue Bosquet
3rd floor, right door
Bruxelles, 1060
Belgium

Bitcoin is a PROTOTYPE.  All it has is a three year head start which has given it a massive network effect. It has a reclusive, anonymous creator who holds 5% of all bitcoins that will ever be mined.  If just one of Satoshi's coins started moving the entire bitcoin community would collectively shit their pants.

I have always said that if Bitcoin was created tomorrow it would be derided as a heavily premined, incredibly slow shitcoin. But it is bitcoin.

That's what nearly every bitcoiner believes.  It is laughable.  When they try to compare bitcoin to the early Internet what they want is an Internet that will only ever have one website.  

They are currently flirting with the idea of increasing maximum block sizes from 1 megabyte to 20 megabyte so the transactions per second will increase.  What they don't tell you is that even if they hardfork bitcoin so the new block limit is 20 megabytes the transactions per second will be the same as what Litecoin can manage now.  In other words, bitcoin needs a major hardfork just to raise it's transactional performance to that of litecoin.

Bitcoin is a PROTOTYPE.  All it has is a three year head start which has given it a massive network effect. It has a reclusive, anonymous creator who holds 5% of all bitcoins that will ever be mined.  If just one of Satoshi's coins started moving the entire bitcoin community would collectively shit their pants.

I have always said that if Bitcoin was created tomorrow it would be derided as a heavily premined, incredibly slow shitcoin. But it is bitcoin.

 

To believe that nothing will ever be good enough to replace BTC is outright stupid. You cannot just merge all new and/or useful tech into an existing "product" forever and "block" all competition by doing so.

It has started,just got an email from an ambulance chaser lawyer did I want to be part of a class action suit against Gaw

Oye, way off topic but since a number of people asked I have to respond  (BTW if you are going to talk about LTCGear, as a mod I ask that you go to the proper thread and talk about it).


1. I'm not shilling, thanks Mr sockpuppet and feel free to post on your main account along with everyone else asking questions.

2. The position of a moderator is to ensure that there is organization on forums and proper information flowed. I was not protective of Chris at all and there were a ton of questions posted.

3. On a personal note, I am not convinced that LTCGear is A. a scam B. a failed company or C. a company that had some bad luck due to hacking's, but for now for a few days im leaning towards C (again my personal feelings).

4. No, I havent been paid to shill at all. Unlike some people (GAW), I have ethical standards and boundaries that I wont cross.


The 6 pages of stuff I deleted was ether A repeat info (the majority) or B blatant trolling (i.e. WHEN THE FUCK ARE WE GETTING PAID). Yes thats whats on everyones mind, when we are getting paid, its fairly obvious. So I ensured that people who invested with a company didnt have to sift though pages of literal shit to get information.


You're welcome for performing an unpaid/unwelcomed job of moderating and helping trying to quell a situation where a company that owes a large sum of money to people not pay out in several weeks, that I clean up a thread to ensure that the proper information is flowed to everyone accordingly! If I didnt I would get complaints that its at bad as bitcointalk (and yes ive already got those)!



You all should be seriously ashamed of yourselves for even implying that either I or the moderators on Litecointalk have any personal involvement in LTCGear beyond moderation or personal investments. On a personal note, my actions have never been outside the boundaries of ethical. I always approach situations in good faith and do what I can for cryptos to make it better for everyone.

To believe that nothing will ever be good enough to replace BTC is outright stupid.

You cannot just merge all new and/or useful tech into an existing "product" forever and "block" all competition by doing so.

Oye, way off topic but since a number of people asked I have to respond  (BTW if you are going to talk about LTCGear, as a mod I ask that you go to the proper thread and talk about it).


1. I'm not shilling, thanks Mr sockpuppet and feel free to post on your main account along with everyone else asking questions.

2. The position of a moderator is to ensure that there is organization on forums and proper information flowed. I was not protective of Chris at all and there were a ton of questions posted.

3. On a personal note, I am not convinced that LTCGear is A. a scam B. a failed company or C. a company that had some bad luck due to hacking's, but for now for a few days im leaning towards C (again my personal feelings).

4. No, I havent been paid to shill at all. Unlike some people (GAW), I have ethical standards and boundaries that I wont cross.


The 6 pages of stuff I deleted was ether A repeat info (the majority) or B blatant trolling (i.e. WHEN THE FUCK ARE WE GETTING PAID). Yes thats whats on everyones mind, when we are getting paid, its fairly obvious. So I ensured that people who invested with a company didnt have to sift though pages of literal shit to get information.


You're welcome for performing an unpaid/unwelcomed job of moderating and helping trying to quell a situation where a company that owes a large sum of money to people not pay out in several weeks, that I clean up a thread to ensure that the proper information is flowed to everyone accordingly! If I didnt I would get complaints that its at bad as bitcointalk (and yes ive already got those)!



You all should be seriously ashamed of yourselves for even implying that either I or the moderators on Litecointalk have any personal involvement in LTCGear beyond moderation or personal investments. On a personal note, my actions have never been outside the boundaries of ethical. I always approach situations in good faith and do what I can for cryptos to make it better for everyone.