Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1879. (Read 3377945 times)

Where did the rest go?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/address.dws?PGy9HKAx79zViVweczbP7D2JurXqv6Y4iv.htm

ive got my pitchfork and torch. i pity the gaw believers. they are like justins beliebers. what i hate is garza.... that smug smirk thinking hes smarter than everyone else. such a thief and liar. cant wait for karma to catch up with him. its coming.....

I read the article you published about the data breach and thought it was a PR job when I read it the first time. Your claim here is that no one spoke to GAW and you wanted to get their side of the story. So, I went back and just read your questions without GAW's responses. In my opinion, your questions are very leading and it seems you are spinning the story a certain way. Especially when you editorialize with comments like "So while there was a glitch it was not a massive data leak or a breach. GAWMiners responded quickly to the error and cleared up the issue" what you are doing is releasing a PR piece for GAW. That's fine but call it what it is. If the goal was to get GAW's side of the story, just let them say their piece without your own comments. For the record, when you can see customer PII such as personal email addresses and account balances, even if it's a static picture, it's a data breach.

If you really wanted to find out what happened, perhaps you could have talked to CloudFlare to find out how things like this happen. I'm going to guess it's improper programming. Especially when a coding change by GAW seems to fix the issue. However, I'm not positive because I haven't spoken to CloudFlare to get their side or reviewed any of their best practices material (if they have it).

As an aside, the GAW response to this issue reminds me of a software engineer I had on a project once who asked me to open a trouble ticket with Sun. There was obviously a bug in their CPU since his code didn't work. I told him to check his java libs and dependencies but he insisted that the error was with Sun's CPU and he had even isolated the problem. I didn't open the ticket. He finally figured out there was a lib mismatch.

you should post a news article covering the concerns of the other side of the fence to keep it impartial. people tend to think ccn has no credibility on GAW being a scam as their paid banners cover the ccn sites. news should be about impartial sides else credibility fails. once credibility is gone viewers drop and advertising goes down.

Some members here like to witch hunt. It's not like everybody here agrees on the same things. We're not a cult. Even people providing proof against GAW don't like spammers and flamers, bashing people, or making wild accusations against people with little to no reason why anybody would believe that. Such is the name of the game, though. Just ignore and wait for posts you can reply to.

I do not have the power to ban anyone on CCN I am not an admin if someone is banned that is not me.

The funds that were given was done by CryptoCause who is not part of GAW and Josh does not give me money.
I am actively researching more about the red flags, more about the issue that caused the breach on PayBase and will have a follow up.

I have seen people go off like anyone reporting on GAW that is not totally negative means they are paid.  Right from coindesk, coinbrief, techcrunch WSJ to others it makes no sense that people will say we are all paid off because we reported on what they were doing.  None of us are being paid off.

There were no calls that BitFury owns me when I interview them or Spondoolies although I got hate for that when they first announced because people called them a scam.  No one said that because I wrote about ASICMiners I am not somehow FriedCats shill.
GAW does not own the news sites. I do not get paid by them and they are not perfect we will cover it.

Their Hashlets were their cloud mining system.  Genesis has theirs, Zeus and others theirs.  LTCGear as well.  That is the way they all market their products for better or worse.  We are seeing some of them get shaken out now.  We will see what happens with GAW it could be good and it could be bad.  

Posted on twitter,

How are Hashlet sale revenue in any way related to this conversation? The only point that matters in this portion of discussion is: CryptoCause was not a GAWMiners endeavor, it was owned and operated by an entirely different entity.

That's the end of it. The profits were not from Garza's pocket, nor his company's. They were from the entity's.

Why not post links to this thread or other threads like many "NEWS" sites have done? Or the questions that have been asked.
How about an interview with someone like our fearless leader suchmoon? I am sure many of us would get together and make some funds available to pay you for your time.
I also think you know the truth about the 8+ hours it took for gaw to fix the "cloud" problem that exposed peoples emails and how much coins they had in their accounts. You stated only emails were exposed... Do you not call this a breach?
And volder keep your 20-25 btc on the buy order (its been bouncing around like a dirty whore for days, the 20+ btc), I want to see it get eaten up, stop playing chicken
The 13 btc sell owned it.

MtGox part deux.

im actually amazed people can believe unconditionally after all this. the people over there are like kicked puppy dogs. josh kicks hem again and again and again and they are still licking his face asking him what "they" did wrong.

if money wasnt involved these people would see right through him. simply put the people over there in hashtalk land "have to" believe no want to as there is no way out. to not believe means they have to face that they were scammed. nobody wants to admit a fault of their own. common ego and psyche. they will only call scam and blame himnot themselves when there is no way to recoup their losses. thats in 6 months if it even makes it that far.

What FUD! I don't need to fact check Garza, he will provide the $20 floor for it and catch me every time.

https://33.media.tumblr.com/ee7995b1260c896fa50c496f056ab6f7/tumblr_mwdi8cMiWJ1shhb9so1_500.gif

Your claim was the money came from Josh Garza.

Your claim is to be used as support of your argument against MajneBjorn's personal situation.

CryptoCause used many facets to assist the community in their decision to support causes or not.

I responded to your claim with information, i did not state Hashlets were not sold during the raising of funds.

Your argument holds no substance, Locate a new portion of payment from Garza submitted to MajneBjorn.

:grinning:

I know just trying to inject some bad humor into the thread

oops

"it was not a massive data leak or a breach"

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/paybase-security-issue-cloudflare-glitch-showing-static-data-customer-sessions-no-data-lost/

Those are your words, not GAW's. Either way they are completely false. If GAW said that, you should have commented that it's not true, but that doesn't matter because YOU are saying it, and now you know it's false.

If you are legitimate you will change those words, if you are not you will not, it's very simple.

Go away you light weight.

She didn't say she or he did because, she can't say she is a he, your just jealous because she could be a he and you can be a he she see.

That's just the Japanese bankruptcy trustee giving people notice about their rights in the Japanese bankruptcy proceedings.

Mt Gox is back online!!!!!