Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 1978. (Read 3377922 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.

Logic is completely lost with you isn't it?

Nobody is trying to convince you that your experience didn't happen, but that your rare experience wasn't the only one that happened.

Every bit of profit you made came from the losses of someone who didn't pay GAW's game successfully. You are clearly playing the game correctly by investing in any new scheme without thinking about it. You just better hope that GAW's next scheme doesn't start before your cashtakers expire or you'll be left holding a bag like all the other GAW victims.

Also about GAW delivering hardware with no problems, I take it you're not a vaultbreaker customer?

I had nothing but delays with my hardware orders...5 of them...as long as 10 days each!!!  Amber got me compensation,but it was hard fought for & too late as far as I was concerned.

Then I got my Zenhashlets,about 35mh around Sept 18th.Things looked good for about a month and a half,payouts dropped dramatically,CEO says "Payouts will get better,workin on a deal!!!!".

I waited & payouts came up just a bit & boom,back down a few weeks later...........I mined HP's as soon as I could,they'll be the ONLY thing salvaging my ROI,when Paybase comes online...I hope  Roll Eyes

I since sold all my Zens for $10 each,that lost me $230..........I'm a miner at heart & have been since June 2011,BTC is the ONLY coin I believe in ATM.

My power is .13 per kWH,so at home mining is dead ATM,the new half watt (or less) per GH miners coming next year may work for me,got 1400 watts to play with  Wink

As long as the diff don't rocket to 400PH range & BTC stays around $350 I should make mining work again...for a little while at least.

BTW,Zoomhash was the only company that delivered on time & actually answered their phone & communicated in a decent manner  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.

Paid trolls. This is what GAW has sunk too. GAWsome

You should realy read some of your own posts before calling somebody a troll, troll.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
My scripts started getting banned from the IP address by hashtalk, so I'm posting them here. Please run them on any server that you don't need to browse hashtalk on.

>cat archivehashtalk.sh
sed -ne 's/.*\(http[^"]*\).*/\1/p' < archive.json >archive.list
while read in; do archive.sh "$in";done
>cat archive.sh
curl --data url=$1 https://archive.today/submit/

>cat run.sh
while true
do
archivehashtalk.sh
done

>cat scrapesite.py
from scrapy.item import Field, Item
from scrapy.contrib.spiders import CrawlSpider, Rule
from scrapy.contrib.linkextractors import LinkExtractor


class SampleItem(Item):
    link = Field()


class SampleSpider(CrawlSpider):
    name = "sample_spider"
    allowed_domains = ["hashtalk.org"]
    start_urls = ["https://hashtalk.org"]

    rules = (
        Rule(LinkExtractor(), callback='parse_page', follow=True),
    )

    def parse_page(self, response):
        item = SampleItem()
        item['link'] = response.url
        return item



Instructions: install scrapy. Create all these files with the names I have in one directory. Install tmux to run multiple commands at once. Run "scrapy runspider scrapesite.py -t json -o archive.json". Open a new tmux terminal. Run ./run.sh . When you get banned (you'll see 403 errors coming from scrapy), try to switch your public ip address. I'm doing this on ec2 free tier, but maybe people have better lying around.

I know the code is a little hacked up, but it works, and nobody else was doing it. I don't want to provide support for this; there should be enough people seeing this who know what to do, and we only need a few to catch all the pages. If you know code and understand what I'm doing, and think it should be done differently, I'll take advice.
is homero trying to ban the archiving of his posts? if so comedy gold

That's not really what's happening. My script is scraping the website, sending thousands of requests, so to a website operator it looks like a ddos attack. It may even have been cloudflare blocking the ip automatically. If he was blocking archiving, they would just block incoming requests from archive.today, which probably uses multiple IP addresses.

tl;dr They are blocking my scraping of the site, not the archiving. You can see all archived urls at https://archive.today/https://hashtalk.org/* (notice how many are from the last hour? That's a script for you.)
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.

Logic is completely lost with you isn't it?

Nobody is trying to convince you that your experience didn't happen, but that your rare experience wasn't the only one that happened.

Every bit of profit you made came from the losses of someone who didn't pay GAW's game successfully. You are clearly playing the game correctly by investing in any new scheme without thinking about it. You just better hope that GAW's next scheme doesn't start before your cashtakers expire or you'll be left holding a bag like all the other GAW victims.

Also about GAW delivering hardware with no problems, I take it you're not a vaultbreaker customer?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
My scripts started getting banned from the IP address by hashtalk, so I'm posting them here. Please run them on any server that you don't need to browse hashtalk on.

>cat archivehashtalk.sh
sed -ne 's/.*\(http[^"]*\).*/\1/p' < archive.json >archive.list
while read in; do archive.sh "$in";done
>cat archive.sh
curl --data url=$1 https://archive.today/submit/

>cat run.sh
while true
do
archivehashtalk.sh
done

>cat scrapesite.py
from scrapy.item import Field, Item
from scrapy.contrib.spiders import CrawlSpider, Rule
from scrapy.contrib.linkextractors import LinkExtractor


class SampleItem(Item):
    link = Field()


class SampleSpider(CrawlSpider):
    name = "sample_spider"
    allowed_domains = ["hashtalk.org"]
    start_urls = ["https://hashtalk.org"]

    rules = (
        Rule(LinkExtractor(), callback='parse_page', follow=True),
    )

    def parse_page(self, response):
        item = SampleItem()
        item['link'] = response.url
        return item



Instructions: install scrapy. Create all these files with the names I have in one directory. Install tmux to run multiple commands at once. Run "scrapy runspider scrapesite.py -t json -o archive.json". Open a new tmux terminal. Run ./run.sh . When you get banned (you'll see 403 errors coming from scrapy), try to switch your public ip address. I'm doing this on ec2 free tier, but maybe people have better lying around.

I know the code is a little hacked up, but it works, and nobody else was doing it. I don't want to provide support for this; there should be enough people seeing this who know what to do, and we only need a few to catch all the pages. If you know code and understand what I'm doing, and think it should be done differently, I'll take advice.
is homero trying to ban the archiving of his posts? if so comedy gold
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
@Bitpop
Santa left me a raygun under the xmas tree so he must shop at meganet. now since you got one i was hoping you can help. it says to charge it first but its battery cell is stuck at 277/4096 what do i do? Also where do i insert the paycoin as im assuming its pay to play?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
My scripts started getting banned from the IP address by hashtalk, so I'm posting them here. Please run them on any server that you don't need to browse hashtalk on.

>cat archivehashtalk.sh
sed -ne 's/.*\(http[^"]*\).*/\1/p' < archive.json >archive.list
while read in; do archive.sh "$in";done
>cat archive.sh
curl --data url=$1 https://archive.today/submit/

>cat run.sh
while true
do
archivehashtalk.sh
done

>cat scrapesite.py
from scrapy.item import Field, Item
from scrapy.contrib.spiders import CrawlSpider, Rule
from scrapy.contrib.linkextractors import LinkExtractor


class SampleItem(Item):
    link = Field()


class SampleSpider(CrawlSpider):
    name = "sample_spider"
    allowed_domains = ["hashtalk.org"]
    start_urls = ["https://hashtalk.org"]

    rules = (
        Rule(LinkExtractor(), callback='parse_page', follow=True),
    )

    def parse_page(self, response):
        item = SampleItem()
        item['link'] = response.url
        return item



Instructions: install scrapy. Create all these files with the names I have in one directory. Install tmux to run multiple commands at once. Run "scrapy runspider scrapesite.py -t json -o archive.json". Open a new tmux terminal. Run ./run.sh . When you get banned (you'll see 403 errors coming from scrapy), try to switch your public ip address. I'm doing this on ec2 free tier, but maybe people have better lying around.

I know the code is a little hacked up, but it works, and nobody else was doing it. I don't want to provide support for this; there should be enough people seeing this who know what to do, and we only need a few to catch all the pages. If you know code and understand what I'm doing, and think it should be done differently, I'll take advice.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.
you win but when it comes crashing down whoever bought it loses. you fail to fathom this still. yes you did well, many others wont. money in=money out. if 30$ goes in from purchases in gaw from 3 people evenly thats $10 each. if you draw 20$ the other 2 will lose $5.

think about the big picture of the scheme not what just you had!
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.

Paid trolls. This is what GAW has sunk too. GAWsome
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 501

Is that really all you have to say about that entire story Cheesy

That's just it, it's just a fcking story. YOUR story. A bunch of strung together anecdotes that's somehow supposed to convince me that my experience with them never happened?  Nope, sorry.

I had zero trouble with them delivering hardware.. The ONLY company I can actually say that about. I bought hashlets soon after they came out, but not on day one. I ROI'd in 2 months. GAW then allowed Zen to mine hash points... And although not worth anything but a promise, I converted to mine them anyways. After all, my original investment was already earned, so I was playing with house money.

I accumulated close to a million hash points, good for 2000+ paycoins. Also, my Zens converted to 6 month hash stakers, a $21 product. So now I am left with a boatload of paycoin, staking, earning me MORE paycoin every day (about 9 XPY per day), plus my original BTC and LTC back (plus more). So now, after being in Crypto mining for 2.5 years abs finally mashing the returns that baby promised, you want me to go bad mouth GAW? WTF? No, sorry.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10

Proof that he changed a post of his is not proof that he lied.


Mey, maybe. But it certainly means that what he says can't be trusted.
Definitely not a man of his word. If he won't stand by what he says or at least admit to changing his mind, why should anyone trust him to deliver on anything he says?

The particular edit that was being trumpeted around as the smoking gun didn't seem that big to me; a minor change of wording. It can be argued that it means the same thing. Not a PROOF THAT GAW IS A BUNCH OF LYING BASTARDS like the posters here seem to think it is.
It proves what we've been stating about the buy wall. They aren't going to dip into their own pockets to buy it, but instead "manage" orders between people. The wall does not exist, that is what it proves. He lied. Continue to remain blind at your leisure though.

That is still not that clear. There are still other posts saying he will maintain the buy wall at $20 next week. The fact that it was pushed off a week weighs far higher than this edit. It could be read both ways. Quote-mining a single edited post and not mentioning that he continues to state that paybase will buy at $20 does not an objective appearance give off.

It should be clear as fucking day what GAW is going to do considering the amount of other peoples money riding on this pipe dream, and none of you GAW retards seem to have a problem with that.

Lay out your predictions, then. (I would challenge you to bet but I got deleted before for doing that.) Calling people retards is fine when you do it, but when GAW calls people trolls, that's terrible?

I could care less that i get called a troll, and i probably am one considering the 12 plus accounts i've burned over at HT for laughs. The problem with predictions is that Homero changes directions three times a day, its the uncertainty and the fact he is just making things up as he goes along that causes people to dislike and distrust him plus the fucking vests... can't stand the vests. The half truths he spouts as great innovation and pricing floors always end up being the very least of what is promised, he does just enough to not be a flat out liar but is certainly misleading people by not being straight forward.


Wow, you got a lot of time on your hands... I don't know if that's just sad, or.... well, sad.

I do have a lot of time on my hands... i just wish my moms house had a basement...

LOL 12 accounts, kick him out the door and he'll jump in through the window  Grin
its a pain, i think they review all new accounts with a outlook/hotmail email address now, had to change up free mail servers
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
https://hashtalk.org/topic/25643/prime-controller-issue

Quote
@BeardedCouncil said:

Quote
@c2083977 said:

Quote
@c2083977 said:

is everyone aware of the powers of prime controllers?

absolute control over what tx exist,
ya it wont be in your mempool, so no way of knowing if censorship is going on unless your a prime controller

control on blockchain forks and codebase,
they determine what the "majority" software wallet is and the "majority" blockchain

so yes we should be questioning the trust/centralization issue
not because we cant trust GAW, but because we cant trust big money and the powers that be
only crypto principles can stop them and GAW is breaking those principles
Edward Snowden revealed the depth at which they are willing to go, no law stands in their way.

Quote
@BeardedCouncil said:

Can't be arsed to read 8 pages of argumentative tut, but did anyone point out that the guys math sucks? As the network grows, more Prime Nodes are needed, but the amount to be one goes down. The total allocated to PN is 50%, at 50 PN that is indeed 1% of all XPY each, but at 100PN it becomes 0.5% oh look all his points moving past that are invalid.

OP, I saw you spout some tut about people disregarding "proofs" well there are some logic and facts for you to adjust to.

since there is no code yet for that scaling, i cant argue if that is true or not
im arguing based on current known conditions

there is also no code yet for the bidding process

Pretty sure you're arguing out of deliberate ignorance actually. A quick glance at your post history is enough for me to end the discussion after this post.

Stop making shit up.

PN do not have authority to just wipe out an address or a transaction like you randomly spouted. They help propagate instant tx, so do Orions (when they arrive) and other features but a standard staked block can't just be erased. You have literally made this shit up out of fucking nowhere.

You're full of crap. You've clearly not read the whitepaper. No intention to, no real understanding of any of the concepts at play here. By the book illiterate nonce sense from BCTroll, once again.

You guys are funny. This thread is funny. It will be locked soon and you are on the verge of being banned. My spidey senses say so.

Don't bother replying.

Banned before he said that,
I cant leave it like that, what a douche


im not talking about whipping, im talking about censuring before they enter mempool and thereafter the blockchain

https://c91475e716c8925e05c6-d2659d433205cf4410415f8dd63807af.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/paycoinwhitepaper.pdf
Quote
6.2.2
  Performing as the FIRST entry point of a transaction into the network

this guy sounds just like a troll, prima facie, no thought of his own

It is sad that this is his response

Quote
 
GAWCEO

Quote
@c2083977 said:

the fact that prime controllers require 1% of the currency in circulation means that it would be almost impossible for any new party to ever get 1%, thereby breaking the prime bidding process, its fixed and flawed to only work for those who already have 1%.

I would not buy in to a coin if you do not trust the makers.  


Oh and btw, I love Mint, ty for your work and its an honor to be in the same forum with you, keep up the great work!

i am not a linux mint developer, my contribution was complaints on cinnamon crashing with AMD triple screen configuration



on a side note, i wouldn't be surprised if GAW hired a few of these BitcoinTalk trolltards to distract and de-legitamise real concern/discussion
this thread aint pretty
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251

Proof that he changed a post of his is not proof that he lied.


Mey, maybe. But it certainly means that what he says can't be trusted.
Definitely not a man of his word. If he won't stand by what he says or at least admit to changing his mind, why should anyone trust him to deliver on anything he says?

The particular edit that was being trumpeted around as the smoking gun didn't seem that big to me; a minor change of wording. It can be argued that it means the same thing. Not a PROOF THAT GAW IS A BUNCH OF LYING BASTARDS like the posters here seem to think it is.
It proves what we've been stating about the buy wall. They aren't going to dip into their own pockets to buy it, but instead "manage" orders between people. The wall does not exist, that is what it proves. He lied. Continue to remain blind at your leisure though.

That is still not that clear. There are still other posts saying he will maintain the buy wall at $20 next week. The fact that it was pushed off a week weighs far higher than this edit. It could be read both ways. Quote-mining a single edited post and not mentioning that he continues to state that paybase will buy at $20 does not an objective appearance give off.

It should be clear as fucking day what GAW is going to do considering the amount of other peoples money riding on this pipe dream, and none of you GAW retards seem to have a problem with that.

Lay out your predictions, then. (I would challenge you to bet but I got deleted before for doing that.) Calling people retards is fine when you do it, but when GAW calls people trolls, that's terrible?

I could care less that i get called a troll, and i probably am one considering the 12 plus accounts i've burned over at HT for laughs. The problem with predictions is that Homero changes directions three times a day, its the uncertainty and the fact he is just making things up as he goes along that causes people to dislike and distrust him plus the fucking vests... can't stand the vests. The half truths he spouts as great innovation and pricing floors always end up being the very least of what is promised, he does just enough to not be a flat out liar but is certainly misleading people by not being straight forward.


Wow, you got a lot of time on your hands... I don't know if that's just sad, or.... well, sad.

I do have a lot of time on my hands... i just wish my moms house had a basement...

LOL 12 accounts, kick him out the door and he'll jump in through the window  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
favelle75 - I remember when GAW was selling equipment. I personally did not have any problems with on time deliveries. But there were people that had to wait they were far and few in between but it is the truth. Also at the time they did look out for there customer and whatever they told you it was the truth and they made it happen. Dont know why you people from HT don't see the difference between GAW then and now. Somewhere along the lines GAW started bending the truth. Its a totally different company now. People say transparency  - All I know is if I asked a question before I would get a direct straight answer. Try that now see where it gets you.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
Crushed - excellent write up and no truer words have been spoken. Thanks
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 501
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Cryptocoin Dabbler
...Excellent summary removed for brevity's sake...



Well done sir. I've experienced similar feelings during these events, but was not able to put them down in digital bytes as succinctly as you have just done.

newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10

Proof that he changed a post of his is not proof that he lied.


Mey, maybe. But it certainly means that what he says can't be trusted.
Definitely not a man of his word. If he won't stand by what he says or at least admit to changing his mind, why should anyone trust him to deliver on anything he says?

The particular edit that was being trumpeted around as the smoking gun didn't seem that big to me; a minor change of wording. It can be argued that it means the same thing. Not a PROOF THAT GAW IS A BUNCH OF LYING BASTARDS like the posters here seem to think it is.
It proves what we've been stating about the buy wall. They aren't going to dip into their own pockets to buy it, but instead "manage" orders between people. The wall does not exist, that is what it proves. He lied. Continue to remain blind at your leisure though.

That is still not that clear. There are still other posts saying he will maintain the buy wall at $20 next week. The fact that it was pushed off a week weighs far higher than this edit. It could be read both ways. Quote-mining a single edited post and not mentioning that he continues to state that paybase will buy at $20 does not an objective appearance give off.

It should be clear as fucking day what GAW is going to do considering the amount of other peoples money riding on this pipe dream, and none of you GAW retards seem to have a problem with that.

Lay out your predictions, then. (I would challenge you to bet but I got deleted before for doing that.) Calling people retards is fine when you do it, but when GAW calls people trolls, that's terrible?

I could care less that i get called a troll, and i probably am one considering the 12 plus accounts i've burned over at HT for laughs. The problem with predictions is that Homero changes directions three times a day, its the uncertainty and the fact he is just making things up as he goes along that causes people to dislike and distrust him plus the fucking vests... can't stand the vests. The half truths he spouts as great innovation and pricing floors always end up being the very least of what is promised, he does just enough to not be a flat out liar but is certainly misleading people by not being straight forward.


Wow, you got a lot of time on your hands... I don't know if that's just sad, or.... well, sad.

I do have a lot of time on my hands... i just wish my moms house had a basement...
Jump to: