Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 206. (Read 3377790 times)

newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0

Yes I like mining. I enjoy building the rigs and then trying to get them to work. I'm running eight rigs at home right now. I switched to X11 for a little while but I find the ETH returns more reliable and less demanding on the hardware.

How do you feel about ION stating that POw mining is dead?

I have been mining ETH for months and it is still working fine for me now.

Naturally the returns are becoming less as the difficulty increases, but it is still profitable and I hope it remains so for many more months to come.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL

I think ETH has potential (this is not investment advice) however I like mining, so I have helped lots of people with their mining rigs and setup, but I am not saying to invest in ETH, and if you don't already have a rig then it's risky to start building one right now as ROI may not happen for a long time.

You like mining? Why do you support ION then? It clearly stated in the two paid press releases that the ION team thinks POW is dead.

Yes I like mining. I enjoy building the rigs and then trying to get them to work. I'm running eight rigs at home right now. I switched to X11 for a little while but I find the ETH returns more reliable and less demanding on the hardware.

How do you feel about ION stating that POw mining is dead?
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0

I think ETH has potential (this is not investment advice) however I like mining, so I have helped lots of people with their mining rigs and setup, but I am not saying to invest in ETH, and if you don't already have a rig then it's risky to start building one right now as ROI may not happen for a long time.

You like mining? Why do you support ION then? It clearly stated in the two paid press releases that the ION team thinks POW is dead.

Yes I like mining. I enjoy building the rigs and then trying to get them to work. I'm running eight rigs at home right now. I switched to X11 for a little while but I find the ETH returns more reliable and less demanding on the hardware.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.

Yet you're doing the same thing with ION. So you're either making stuff up again, or have inside information that makes you ignore the red flags. Which is it?

Take a moment to check out my twitter... It looks nothing like what I did for MOON, MINT, BOOM, BLACKCOIN and XPY (and some other coins).

I think ETH has potential (this is not investment advice) however I like mining, so I have helped lots of people with their mining rigs and setup, but I am not saying to invest in ETH, and if you don't already have a rig then it's risky to start building one right now as ROI may not happen for a long time.

You like mining? Why do you support ION then? It clearly stated in the two paid press releases that the ION team thinks POW is dead.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
You can't ask for "reasonable discussion" and then proceed by evading and then eventually blatantly denying what we can PROVE you actually did.

To be fair you can't really expect him to incriminate himself here. The goal is probably the opposite - to skew the historic context.

Having said that, it's good to know that it's really different this time  Grin

Take a moment to check out my twitter... It looks nothing like what I did for MOON, MINT, BOOM, BLACKCOIN and XPY (and some other coins).

BTW... MrCoins, did you get banned on talkxpy? Shows as "Guest".

Suchmoon, I appreciate the discussion and the way you have conducted it.

I (finally) no longer hold any XPY and have quit the TalkXPY forum.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
You can't ask for "reasonable discussion" and then proceed by evading and then eventually blatantly denying what we can PROVE you actually did.

To be fair you can't really expect him to incriminate himself here. The goal is probably the opposite - to skew the historic context.

Having said that, it's good to know that it's really different this time  Grin

Take a moment to check out my twitter... It looks nothing like what I did for MOON, MINT, BOOM, BLACKCOIN and XPY (and some other coins).

BTW... MrCoins, did you get banned on talkxpy? Shows as "Guest".
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.

Yet you're doing the same thing with ION. So you're either making stuff up again, or have inside information that makes you ignore the red flags. Which is it?

Take a moment to check out my twitter... It looks nothing like what I did for MOON, MINT, BOOM, BLACKCOIN and XPY (and some other coins).

I think ETH has potential (this is not investment advice) however I like mining, so I have helped lots of people with their mining rigs and setup, but I am not saying to invest in ETH, and if you don't already have a rig then it's risky to start building one right now as ROI may not happen for a long time.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.

Yet you're doing the same thing with ION. So you're either making stuff up again, or have inside information that makes you ignore the red flags. Which is it?

He has inside information, he paid to be considered a whale. Another feature of Garza - pay to be more important than others.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
No source:

http://ht.uksafedns.net/hashtalk.org/topic/35025/is-paycoin-on-the-verge-of-being-approved-by-the-sec/62.html

"What happens when the SEC write back to Josh/GAW and say "Thank you for complying with our informational requests and assisting us with our enquiries. We are pleased to announce that we have found that your organisation is not in breach of any SEC regulations. We wish you the best of luck with your venture."

"Could it be that we are now invested in the first coin to be "APPROVED" and given a "Clean bill of health" by a major government agency?"

That's all you bud.

EDIT-

AH! Suchmoon beat me too it.

Either then, you didn't believe all the crap you read.

YOU MADE UP THAT SCENARIO. It was fabricated by you. It had no reference to reality (and the SEC doesn't do anything of the sort anyway, as people told you with references in your twitter and you yet you still argued you were correct.

You can't ask for "reasonable discussion" and then proceed by evading and then eventually blatantly denying what we can PROVE you actually did.

 Huh
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

It linked to your own thread on hashtalk. If you're saying your source was yourself then you made it up.


Is there an old copy of hashtalk up anywhere on another domain? The source will be in that post if it was my post.

I was never a primary source of any information, and never claimed to be.

Nope, there is no source, just your lies (BTW if you call them "logic" that doesn't make it so):

https://archive.is/Pfzr6

Quote
Yesterday Paycoin was hit by another negative news release but it didn't have the usual effect.
The fabrication of the story contents/images was so poorly constructed that it throws into question all prior articles, even to the most hardened XPY detractor.
The price was dipping until the story was released and then price rebounded unexpectedly. Could this be because the story did not have the anticipated effect on market value?
But, have you thought about this....
What happens when the SEC write back to Josh/GAW and say "Thank you for complying with our informational requests and assisting us with our enquiries. We are pleased to announce that we have found that your organisation is not in breach of any SEC regulations. We wish you the best of luck with your venture."
Can you imagine what could happen to Paycoin market price?
Paycoin would have withstood the highest level of scrutiny
This would be seen as a "seal of approval" by many
Paycoin will be the ONLY coin that is APPROVED by the SEC
Institutional investors will be more confident to consider investing
Could it be that we are now invested in the first coin to be "APPROVED" and given a "Clean bill of health" by a major government agency?
What do you think could happen when this day arrives? Are you ready for it?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384

Quote
Spread the word! People are starting to worry out there that this might happen!

Quote
I said they've HAD four weeks to act so far. Im sure they can take as long as they like. But right now, GAW and Paycoin are still alive. The longer this continues, the more likely the SEC will do nothing. It's just plain logic

Quote
You have information? I'm just using plain logic. I'll share my response here as its the same...

Quote
If there was something wrong they can act immediately. They can take all sites down without notice. The fact that they have done nothing so far to me speaks volumes Smiley

Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.

And your relentless cheerleading cause many other to lose money as well. Just read the quote suchmoon just posted of you. You are telling people outright that everything is fine. And they bought bought bought on that advice. But yes, you are the victim here.

Again: Being a HUGE supporter of ION, could you explain why you feel POW is dead? If you feel POW is dead, why do you mine ethereum?  Also, what revolutionary features does ION have that the coin it was cloned from not have?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.

Yet you're doing the same thing with ION. So you're either making stuff up again, or have inside information that makes you ignore the red flags. Which is it?
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

It linked to your own thread on hashtalk. If you're saying your source was yourself then you made it up.


Is there an old copy of hashtalk up anywhere on another domain? The source will be in that post if it was my post.

I was never a primary source of any information, and never claimed to be.

Nope, there is no source, just your lies (BTW if you call them "logic" that doesn't make it so):

https://archive.is/Pfzr6

Quote
Yesterday Paycoin was hit by another negative news release but it didn't have the usual effect.
The fabrication of the story contents/images was so poorly constructed that it throws into question all prior articles, even to the most hardened XPY detractor.
The price was dipping until the story was released and then price rebounded unexpectedly. Could this be because the story did not have the anticipated effect on market value?
But, have you thought about this....
What happens when the SEC write back to Josh/GAW and say "Thank you for complying with our informational requests and assisting us with our enquiries. We are pleased to announce that we have found that your organisation is not in breach of any SEC regulations. We wish you the best of luck with your venture."
Can you imagine what could happen to Paycoin market price?
Paycoin would have withstood the highest level of scrutiny
This would be seen as a "seal of approval" by many
Paycoin will be the ONLY coin that is APPROVED by the SEC
Institutional investors will be more confident to consider investing
Could it be that we are now invested in the first coin to be "APPROVED" and given a "Clean bill of health" by a major government agency?
What do you think could happen when this day arrives? Are you ready for it?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384

Quote
Spread the word! People are starting to worry out there that this might happen!

Quote
I said they've HAD four weeks to act so far. Im sure they can take as long as they like. But right now, GAW and Paycoin are still alive. The longer this continues, the more likely the SEC will do nothing. It's just plain logic

Quote
You have information? I'm just using plain logic. I'll share my response here as its the same...

Quote
If there was something wrong they can act immediately. They can take all sites down without notice. The fact that they have done nothing so far to me speaks volumes Smiley

Yup, I believed all the crap I read. Big mistake. Cost me a lot. Lessons learned. It was a scam.

I know that now.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

It linked to your own thread on hashtalk. If you're saying your source was yourself then you made it up.


Is there an old copy of hashtalk up anywhere on another domain? The source will be in that post if it was my post.

I was never a primary source of any information, and never claimed to be.

Nope, there is no source, just your lies (BTW if you call them "logic" that doesn't make it so):

https://archive.is/Pfzr6

Quote
Yesterday Paycoin was hit by another negative news release but it didn't have the usual effect.
The fabrication of the story contents/images was so poorly constructed that it throws into question all prior articles, even to the most hardened XPY detractor.
The price was dipping until the story was released and then price rebounded unexpectedly. Could this be because the story did not have the anticipated effect on market value?
But, have you thought about this....
What happens when the SEC write back to Josh/GAW and say "Thank you for complying with our informational requests and assisting us with our enquiries. We are pleased to announce that we have found that your organisation is not in breach of any SEC regulations. We wish you the best of luck with your venture."
Can you imagine what could happen to Paycoin market price?
Paycoin would have withstood the highest level of scrutiny
This would be seen as a "seal of approval" by many
Paycoin will be the ONLY coin that is APPROVED by the SEC
Institutional investors will be more confident to consider investing
Could it be that we are now invested in the first coin to be "APPROVED" and given a "Clean bill of health" by a major government agency?
What do you think could happen when this day arrives? Are you ready for it?
Twitter: https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384

Quote
Spread the word! People are starting to worry out there that this might happen!

Quote
I said they've HAD four weeks to act so far. Im sure they can take as long as they like. But right now, GAW and Paycoin are still alive. The longer this continues, the more likely the SEC will do nothing. It's just plain logic

Quote
You have information? I'm just using plain logic. I'll share my response here as its the same...

Quote
If there was something wrong they can act immediately. They can take all sites down without notice. The fact that they have done nothing so far to me speaks volumes Smiley
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

It linked to your own thread on hashtalk. If you're saying your source was yourself then you made it up.


Is there an old copy of hashtalk up anywhere on another domain? The source will be in that post if it was my post.

I was never a primary source of any information, and never claimed to be.

CryptoBuds: Remember, at the time, I didn't realise it was a scam. So no, I was not knowingly linking back to an obvious scammers forum.

P.S. How long does it take before I don't have to wait 360 seconds between every post?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL

did you or did you not lie about SEC approval?

Your post above seemed to imply that you didn't lie but retweeted "same stuff as everyone else". Can you show us the origin of that "SEC approval" tweet? News article? Something?

Are you implying that people believe the very first mention of SEC approval was from one of my tweets? If so, which one? I will try to locate the source of information. But one thing I can guarantee is that I didn't just "make it up". I read it from somewhere public whether it be from a forum or tweet.

In any case, what would I know about SEC approval? I was never a primary source for "news", I didn't work for GAW and never claimed that I did.

Why don't you just answer the question. If you didn't make it up then it should be very easy to show the source.

https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384



The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

Why would you link back to a forum owned by an obvious scammer of the tweet wasn't an attempt at discrediting the "fudders"? It really shows your true character.

Ha! It was a link to your own thread! Ha ha ha! You keep digging yourself deeper and deeper...keep going, PLEASE! This is great!!
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.

It linked to your own thread on hashtalk. If you're saying your source was yourself then you made it up.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0

did you or did you not lie about SEC approval?

Your post above seemed to imply that you didn't lie but retweeted "same stuff as everyone else". Can you show us the origin of that "SEC approval" tweet? News article? Something?

Are you implying that people believe the very first mention of SEC approval was from one of my tweets? If so, which one? I will try to locate the source of information. But one thing I can guarantee is that I didn't just "make it up". I read it from somewhere public whether it be from a forum or tweet.

In any case, what would I know about SEC approval? I was never a primary source for "news", I didn't work for GAW and never claimed that I did.

Why don't you just answer the question. If you didn't make it up then it should be very easy to show the source.

https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384

http://i.snag.gy/47QIU.jpg

The link to the information source is in the tweet. I did not state any facts, it's a tweet posed as a question (as is common with any headline/title) with a link to the source article. The reader is meant to click on the link and read it and make up their own mind.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org

did you or did you not lie about SEC approval?

Your post above seemed to imply that you didn't lie but retweeted "same stuff as everyone else". Can you show us the origin of that "SEC approval" tweet? News article? Something?

Are you implying that people believe the very first mention of SEC approval was from one of my tweets? If so, which one? I will try to locate the source of information. But one thing I can guarantee is that I didn't just "make it up". I read it from somewhere public whether it be from a forum or tweet.

In any case, what would I know about SEC approval? I was never a primary source for "news", I didn't work for GAW and never claimed that I did.

Why don't you just answer the question. If you didn't make it up then it should be very easy to show the source.

https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/581066951583248384

Loading...
Edited 2020-11-28 to fix a broken image
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
If I missed any questions, then please post them again. I have not intentionally "dodged" anything as I have nothing to dodge. Of course, I am not going to walk into a deliberate attack/tirade of abuse as I have better things to do with my time, but I always have time for reasonable discussion.

Ok, let's try this again. I'll ask one more time:

So do you feel that POW mining is dead? Since you are such a huge supporter and fan of ION. If POw mining is dead, why are you mining ethereum? Also, what aspects of the coin make it so revolutionary from the coin it was cloned from.

What has this question got to do with XPY / GAW / my tweets? This is irrelevant.

Are you kidding me??? You just asked for reasonable conversation and you are going to avoid this question?Huh Unbelievable. So you are intentionally dodging these questions then?
Jump to: