This is in response to what someone asked me on the forum where this information was being discussed. If I was tweeting / promoting / pushing i'd understand... But, i'm not. Like I said, I have to be careful as I am a target for "set up" questions.
You will not find anything outside of the direct question I was asked. No tweets, no blog posts, no recommendations.
I said I see it as shrilling. That is a fact. I don't think I'm the only one here. You shrilled for XPY and now you shrill for ION.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Do you also agree then that I shill for BTC?
"For what it's worth... I see #bitcoin going UP within a week or two. An eventual break above 450 opens up the skies"
https://twitter.com/CryptoDabbler/status/718820256391802885My twitter reaches thousands of people. If you can show my promotion that should be removed, I will remove it.
Yes i see it as shilling for bitcoin. Difference is bitcoin was the first. It was a technology created to address a need. The creators coins in genesis blocks etc haven't moved. Its a curency adopted by many open sourced and not centralised as per stakers like garza etc.
The difference is bitcoin is free market based on peoples faith of it... its perceived value on what people believe though the original ideal had no promises of being this or that no more or less than just a currency.
Xpy promised floors, it promised deals with amazon etc.. people countered that you called them fudders. XPY promised... bitcoin never did. When you shill you promote the creators promises.. see the link. You shilled for xpy you promote promises of $20 etc. You shill bitcoin you promote promises of nothing because nothing was promised.
Ion promises all this bullshit game platform and 20c base value on ico... sorry iso don't want to get mixed up with garza right? change that letter. If they believed in their tech and vision those assholes in ion would make it pow initial phase so its fair and then pos from then on if they believe mining is dead... what do they do instead? Ask you to give them money to buy in. They did nothing for xpy so ion is different how? Its the usual bullshit of its going to do this and that we provide the vision but hey fuck it the community will make the value and content.
I'll fork a coin call it supermarket coin say its for supermarket use and eventually it'll be the coin of supermarkets.. if i get enough shills maybe someone will make shopping cart apps that trade coin value for gift cards at coles, woolworths and target... fuck im a genius... see what these retards do?
OR you could take any of the existing 1000000 alt coins make a game service and use that coin and do the same... whats the difference? You're falling into the same shit and hoping the new owners are better than the old.
I have not given my comments on the other project here, i'll do that in the correct thread so as not to dilute Garza's work.
However, the XPY project was a scam, an intentional scam. It wasn't a failed project or a poorly executed plan. It was executed as the criminal creator intended, entirely to defraud, steal, deceive and steal people's money. There was a perpetrator with bad intent. To me, this defines a scam.
The "scam" word is used so much that it loses it's meaning. I do not believe all altcoins are scams. But some altcoins are created to scam people. The creator is the scammer, not the coin.