As I was catching up with the new posts on this thread a user posted a link to
https://hashtalk.org/topic/21542/why-are-people-selling-the-primes/7. I noticed that the user of the post right under it was banned (SuperPrime), just for my own knowledge I went to read his history and see why he was banned.
User profile:
https://hashtalk.org/user/superprimeWhat I guess is the offending post would be
https://hashtalk.org/topic/21545/can-anyone-find-where-gaw-guarantees-20-00-per-pay-coin/36Well now that could get GAW and Josh into a lot of trouble, if I was Josh I would be hoping that everyone stakes. If not he better have $250 million. He has now just given a lot of GAW haters ammunition to go to varies government bodies in the US and complain, I see the paper work now. This would suck to be GAW. Remember any statement made is now taken as fact and this will not bode well in a court of law. I think @GAW_CEO needs to explain his comment extremely well. I am sure there are a few people who he has upset will now use this
To which PCFan replied:
Good to see where you stand, I already told you that you won't find it as a direct number, just Josh stating estimates. You posting "It's funny no one can find it" (is funny). You state and infer "if anyone does find it you hope that..." They will only find Josh stating estimates. As for the regulations, Josh spent all day with the Digital Chamber of commerce yesterday and you really don't know what your talking about. Your sound scared and unsure and your only concerned with getting out.
P.S. Please edit your title in the OP to "Guarantee" and at least learn how to write well and use correct spelling if your gonna try to talk big. :smirk:
SuperPrime last post before the ban:
@PCfan This is not spreading fear, this is openly discussing an alternative, I have updated my spelling mistake. If you wanted to you could just lock this thread but I am sure you may also want an answer, as much as you are a Mod you are also an investor. I am sure you want an answer as well.
Is this the new openness of moderation mentioned in the Q&A Wednesday were one sided discussion would be a thing of the past? I'm still trying to understand how this user went "too far" and what was the "banable" offense here?