Author

Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) - page 2310. (Read 3377790 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
BTW that pandora person was hoping to become a reseller:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/21364/the-trolls-are-now-at-litecointalk/4

Guess what, the reseller program is being discontinued:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/21370

All that shilling on litecointalk - for nothing. Maybe it's not too late to do the burger joint thing.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
We can be crazy but those clowns think paycoin will replace all other coins, including fiat, by next month. That, without support of any of us, any real developers, anyone smart at all. I love my bag of Bitcoin. They just want to fill up Joshs while he gives them shitcoins.

They even admit to reading the whitepaper and know what a prime controller is. It's so innovative, you have to be retarded to understand it. It really is beyond my retardation.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Annihilation of a core believe in PayCoin, calmly and succicntly put in their place and scared off for good whilst its peanut gallery stands silently observing

deconstruction and shattering of dreams:

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=23571.0

peanut gallery shattered into smithereens:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/21364/the-trolls-are-now-at-litecointalk

I was trying to imagine how that post would look like to someone who has no prior knowledge of GAW, Hashlet, PayCoin etc. E.g. substitute those words with Bob, burger, and meth, or something like that.

Hey, I invested in "Bob's Burgers" and tripled my investment in just a few months. Now there is this new plan. Nobody wants burgers, eating is obsolete, let's cook crystal meth. This will be extremely profitable, but if it isn't you won't have to care because you'll be shot or overdosed anyway.

I mean many of us here are obviously skeptical and all, but if you show a post like that to anyone not familiar with the situation, what would be the first impression? "Yep, sounds good, sign me up"? Some of those HT characters seem to be seriously deluded as to how RL works. Or just very very young.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

That was an amazing post over at Litecointalk. 100% accurate in his assessment.

You need to go look, if you not already, the poor kid has just stated that paycoin could take over as the new world currency!!!
Run out of bloody popcorn as well....

Looks like Litecoin is also not viable
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?

In theory it's about shifting the risk. ROI on mining is not guaranteed. So the service provider takes the guaranteed small profit by selling the service and the customer bets that the mining profits will exceed the cost. It's not a bad arrangement if you think about it. However there is obviously a trust issue that is hard to overcome. Yes, the provider can cryptographically prove their mining capacity. That doesn't prevent them from closing shop tomorrow, selling off hardware, and keeping customers' funds.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060

That was an amazing post over at Litecointalk. 100% accurate in his assessment.

Yeah I don't have patience to be like him, as you can see, the shill doesn't shudder with his lies so Id skip to telling him to fuck off.
legendary
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001

That was an amazing post over at Litecointalk. 100% accurate in his assessment.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
New twitter post from mr. ceo

Quote
Excellent meeting. Paycoin will be the first coin that regulators actually want to work with! #paycoin

https://twitter.com/gawceo/status/540571411132473344

Would like to hear who these regulators are, but I bet he has an NDA for that.


Except, arn't regulators already working with Bitcoin (bitlicense for example)?

Don't quote me but I believe you are right.  Suchmoon probably has a better answer. 

I don't, sorry. I've heard of BitLicense proposals in New York, but haven't really looked much into it. I have no doubt that there will be more and more regulatory pressure on crypto currencies, mostly on KYC and consumer protection fronts, but I'm pretty sure it won't be about one company or one coin. Laws and regulations typically don't work like that.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?

You could still make money out of the maintenance and maybe a re-up every so often to keep up with difficulty of whatever coin that is being mined.

Why actually buy the miners?

If someone is going to give  you 1 coin to "rent" a miner that will pay out .8bitcoins over time, why bother paying to buy and maintain the machine,?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?

You could still make money out of the maintenance and maybe a re-up every so often to keep up with difficulty of whatever coin that is being mined.

But why not just ponzi? Free money..
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
aka. dibdab
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?

You could still make money out of the maintenance and maybe a re-up every so often to keep up with difficulty of whatever coin that is being mined.

So i would outsource the most profitable part to the customer and keep the least profitable? Sounds like a plan
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?

You could still make money out of the maintenance and maybe a re-up every so often to keep up with difficulty of whatever coin that is being mined.
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
aka. dibdab
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

If you have a company that would sell a service that will ROI in lets say 3 months, why the hell would you sell the service?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.

Not possible. It takes just a click to oversell and instant ponzi.
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
I have one question just one. What is wrong with a cloud mining company offering just that cloud mining. Decent payouts - no grief . I dont think there is one.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
@Gava the wsj comments are anonymous and worth a fart if you ask me.

on bitcointalk however, I have found that you can have some very worthy and useful discussions, provided you ignore the inevitable hateful Trolls (bitpop anyone?). As long as you don't acknowledge the trolls (easy, make use of the "IGNORE" button) and focus on having a constructive discussion, it usually turns out quite well...

 solid72 posted about 2 hours ago
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
Annihilation of a core believe in PayCoin, calmly and succicntly put in their place and scared off for good whilst its peanut gallery stands silently observing

deconstruction and shattering of dreams:

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=23571.0

peanut gallery shattered into smithereens:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/21364/the-trolls-are-now-at-litecointalk

Even shitcoiners don't shitcoin
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
New twitter post from mr. ceo

Quote
Excellent meeting. Paycoin will be the first coin that regulators actually want to work with! #paycoin

https://twitter.com/gawceo/status/540571411132473344

Would like to hear who these regulators are, but I bet he has an NDA for that.


Except, arn't regulators already working with Bitcoin (bitlicense for example)?

Don't quote me but I believe you are right.  Suchmoon probably has a better answer. 
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100
New twitter post from mr. ceo

Quote
Excellent meeting. Paycoin will be the first coin that regulators actually want to work with! #paycoin

https://twitter.com/gawceo/status/540571411132473344

Would like to hear who these regulators are, but I bet he has an NDA for that.


Except, arn't regulators already working with Bitcoin (bitlicense for example)?
Jump to: