Topic: GazetaBitcoin and his shenanigans. (Read 1168 times)

Unfortunately for Royse777, he has a history of losing control and letting out of control emotions get the better of him. I do not have time right now to first find and then to post links to all associated threads as I am busy but it is a fact.

Royse777 has exposed himself as a hypocrite who contacts the clients of other campaign managers trying to subliminally steal them yet complains when other members contact his clients (or prospective clients) to only warn them to stay away from a volatile, unbalanced and unhinged character with narcissistic tendencies that has an uncontrollable urge to brag about his so-called exploits as a campaign manager.

Pay attention to the impact of your actions. If these clients are privacy enhancing services, their credibility as privacy keepers may decreased by several points. I don't think you should involve or ask for help from your clients in your next feud, you seem like the type of guy who easily loses control.

Yes it was public knowledge. Sinbad was seized towards the end of November 2023 but I had already created a thread in May 2023 asking the question: After Chipmixer, Is Sinbad.io Next To Be Shutdown? therefore it was public knowledge too.

The reason I cited for asking the question that thread was because Sinbad was a re-brand of Blender. A blockchain company had already connected at least $22 million of Blender funds to Sinbad as a means to get their money laundering business started therefore why did Royse777 decide to continue with promoting  Sinbad rather than exit and stop his connection to them when he knew they were money launderers?

I will start with the fact that I guess you know that I do trust you. However, here you're doing it wrong.
Yes, I've seen some of the posts he has made fun* of your advertising. But instead of you letting it go (we do know that advertising must be taken with a couple of grains of salt*), ... we ended up here, with publishing PMs


* I tried to say it nice enough about both; I don't like to see pretty much 3 people I esteem end up in a stupid fight about... umm.. what?

This was public information and everyone knew that sinbad was just rebranded mixer with different name.
If you look the history how this manager handled his previous campaigns you will find many big mistakes.
Now he is blaming Gazeta for talking with his clients, and he is doing the same thing with clients from other managers.
Gazeta is not even a manager  

If (and I'm speculating here) Sinbad was created by a bad actor looking for privacy minded people to exchange their illicit funds, it could very well be 100% of the signature payments came from the wrong side of the law.

PGP isn't very convenient to use. And it won't stop the receiver from publishing the message.

This drama is ridiculous. However, I wouldn't hold Sinbad against Royse. It could happen to any campaign manager. Although now with mixers being bad (banned) the probability of that happening is much lower.

They don't exactly receive information from their project managers that 40% of their activity is money laundering or something like that. After all, why would someone share that kind of information to their advertisers?


End-to-end encryption already exists, it's literally PGP but nobody uses it:

Not here in Canada.  I was a IT manager for over 30 years and I never once gave a manager access to an employee's email.

Regardless of what Royse777 decides to do with this thread, it is clear what type of mindset he has. We have to note this is not the first time he has engaged in such behaviour it will not be the last either. He seems to go through periodic cycles of creating threads in the Reputation board on matters that suit his agenda.

OK, I apologize, I edited that post and emphasized that I was trying to be sarcastic.

I think what Royse777 should do is change the thread title to "Discussion of private messages on the forum and possible alternatives" and move it to Meta, as the discussion this thread has been focusing on for days now has little to do with the title or any reputation, as was the original intent of the thread.

@Royse777, You only create the thread without replying to the comments and now the thread is running to two pages. When someone creates a thread for important discussion then the author of the thread would follow up the thread and make replies in the thread. You created a thread for the forum users to sell themselves in the right way and you gave some examples which private PMs were used and also pinned points some of the things you wouldn't post for private purpose and for you, I have done bad and you create a thread inserted without any comment. I didn't against your thread over there and only said you wouldn't do that since it was a private chats but whereby the person permitted you or you have an issue and the forum needs evidence for you to clear yourself then you can publish it. But in that case you were advising the forum users to sell themselves so there was no need to bring out a confidential private chats to the public. I have not against you in anyway but only made some corrections. Don't be offended.

Till now I have not known why my name is highlighted here in the Op. Please can you make an input for me to know why?  You would have made a comment in the other thread to reply my comment instead of creating new topic for it.

And for the Pm, it will not be nice to remove it or giving some second for the text to be disappeared, there are some PMs that are good for future reference. And there are some vital information that are good to keep it there for future reading. Now it is left for the forum users to understand the uses and usage of the Pm then all will be well. Please don't expose another person secret with you, the matter what. Stay safe and Chat fair.

Why should we completely disable the ability to send PMs? It doesn't bring any problem. The problem only arises when someone publishes private message and absolutely nothing can solve that problem. Tell something to someone, send message to someone, any human can always reveal private info. The solution is not to prohibit communication.

How can encryption save you from revealing your PM? First of all, people rarely use PGP, then, even if you send me PGP encrypted message, what stops me from revealing your PM? Or what stops me from sending it so someone else if they ask me to send? I don't do any of that but you got the point.

Do you mean the mixer? That is a completely different scenario.

This reminds me of banning some features on the forum because one [banned name] turned out to be bad. 

Forum already provided a solution but most of us don't take it serious.

The Forum PM is not end to end encrypted and most managers have access to their clients accounts/PMs ( this is not a bad idea as most of the time they serve as ANN moderator). If one must send a confidential message he has to encrypt it or use another means. Nothing is private here.

Removing a feature because someone who used the feature did something that's not even forbidden seems like a terrible solution.

I agree with you, I also think he is the one not behaving himself. Royse777 has a habit of digging a hole and climbing in to it. What is he trying to achieve by bringing more unnecessary focus to a subject that really does not deserve it. He was attacking icopress and GazetaBitcoin in various threads recently and now he has created another one to extend the feud.

I would definitely question the manner in which Royse777 conducts himself as a campaign manager but have not contacted any prospective clients looking for a campaign manager to advise them to stay away from Royse777. If they read the feedback and believe the nonsense he feeds them about why he received negative tags unfairly (or via a vendetta), they deserve each other as far as I am concerned.

If Royse777 can write to promoters advising them to ditch icopress or any other campaign manager then he has lost the moral high ground when it comes to others writing to promoters that he works for therefore I have no idea why he is complaining at every opportunity about other members.

Where do you people get the guts to publish the other party's PM without their permission?

I would understand if it was a scammer or someone trying to spread malware.

And then this endless drama. It's not worth it. We found this forum and one day we shall leave it just like that. All these fights for power and signature campaigns won't matter. I like ignoring, It's the best medicine.

Maybe we should introduce something more radical, to completely disable the ability to send PMs. This possibility seems to bring only problems. edit: sarcasm

Automatic deletion of PM is wrong for several reasons. For example, what if the message is long and I can't read it in those 30 seconds?
What kind of protection is there if I immediately forward it further?
For example, when I'm discussing with someone via PM, especially if it's about some trade or deal, I always send quotes along with the answer so that all parties are sure we're talking about the same thing because most often a deal can't be made in 30 seconds. And I would say that it is quite important as a possibility.

I'm not in favour of making public PMs, I guess there's a reason why they're called "private messages", but there are situations where it's necessary.

First of all, I think that feature is not possible without JS but at the same time, it's possible to use Bitcointalk without javascript, so, it's meaningless to implement such a feature. Then, it's impossible to block 3rd party softwares from capturing a screen. Even if that was possible,  what if I am recording my screen with smartphone camera before I open the PM? Such a feature doesn't make sense.