Topic: [GBIT] GRAVITYBITS - SHA256 - POW/hiPOS - GravityBits Auctions - page 2. (Read 12922 times)

I think there is some error in staking.

I was staking some coins and my weighted shares was enough to fetch me a stake block within 4 hours.
But recently I noticed that the ETA went beyond 10 hours!

Can you explain this?

I think someone is staking large number of coins in a single wallet to increase the staking difficulty!
Not a good sign for stability

We will have some previews up this week on the new site.

where my coin? i'm wd on pool not received
ID:103028
Date:2016-02-11 05:52:03
Amount:3,392.61757029
payment address GQgcqUcHNZiTWVrV8yDD2Dt5T1D94sHPBp
please reply https://pool.mn/gbit

Hmm .... Something I like this coin! I really still do not understand what it was, but definitely like

Great to see we are listed.  Thanks YoBit.

We will be doing a twitter giveaway later today.  Keep your eye out for it.

GravityBits [GBIT] is listed: https://yobit.net/en/trade/GBIT/BTC
GravityBits Dice: https://yobit.net/en/dice/GBIT




Donate GBIT coins to our Giveaway: https://yobit.net/en/freecoins/

Please report about GBIT update/fork/issue here: https://yobit.net/en/reportupdate/GBIT

still mining ,watching and waiting,,  hope the coin gets listed..

Just been working on the site.   We are looking to have the beta open by the end of the month.

500 coin blocks now in play. 

Any news GravityBits?

When you see a playground for bidding? To start POS need to know the price of the coin

Nice code review.

CBlock::SetBestChainInner          Good      blackcoin arch       
ComputeMinWork                     Good      arch                 
SendMessages                       Good      shrmcoin             
CTransaction::FetchInputs          Good      shrmcoin             
CTransaction::CheckTransaction     Good      blackcoin arch       
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good      blackcoin arch       
GetNextTargetRequired              Good      shrmcoin             
CTransaction::ConnectInputs        Good      arch                 
GetTransaction                     Good      shrmcoin             
ComputeMinStake                    Good      arch                 
CBlock::AcceptBlock                Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=bbf48bacdea061095019;   Manually inspected, Good
ProcessMessage                     Good      shrmcoin             
CBlock::CheckBlock                 Good      shrmcoin             
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor  Good      blackcoin arch       
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs     Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessBlock                       Good      shrmcoin             
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity     Most similar blackcoin, diff=3, codehash=5c77fb68fcd0580d7737;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority       Good      dash blackcoin arch 
CBlock::SignBlock                  Good      shrmcoin             
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool      Good      shrmcoin             
CheckProofOfWork                   Good      arch                 
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust         Good      blackcoin arch       
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature        Good      arch                 
CTransaction::GetValueIn           Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessMessages                    Good      shrmcoin             
CBlock::ConnectBlock               Good      shrmcoin             
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good

---

What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically.  As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock                Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e'  means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.

coin is working for me

Anyone who's invested should throw some retweets this way.

Let's get GravityBits listed on an exchange.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Antiiclimax/status/695525329180368896

https://mobile.twitter.com/AltCryptoFollow/status/694903605548179456

Assuming he did not solo - he found 4700 for the MN pool. Add a few stakes to that if he staked and he should have around 4700-6000.

I implied that and then he asked how much. So who exactly is the retarded one in this scenario? lol

He just doesn't believe in the project.  No biggie.  I think its a great idea.  Those types of sites generate a lot of revenue.  And isn't that what cryptos need, income.