A startup exchange with hardly any userbase trying to get photo ID verification. It may be the correct way but users will choose another, there is no dearth of exchanges.
IMO gebbit is going about it the wrong way, but then it is their business they must have some experience.
Topic: Gebbit | DO NOT USE - SCAM - NO ID (Read 2330 times)
Worked for lesser hours?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
There is never gonna be a conclusion for this
as expected from both sided is a hot headed type which claims to be correct while the other one is wrong
small claim to have done the job and worked as the minimum hours agreement ( no solid proof for this )
Gebbit claim that small didnt work as the agreement and did the last work after his payment is withheld ( again no proof for this only a claim from gebbit )
Small in the end you didn't send anything except one picture which showed you had lied about having done the work you said you did. The proof was not only that you didn't send the work but that the homepage had changed showing that you had done that one picture only after I withheld pay. And withholding pay was part of the agreement.
in the end because there is no solid proof of which one is lying, then this matter will keep on stucking at this pace
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
Upon the 10th image you sent the resolution was clear enough to see that your name was not even present expect for in your own writing on the document. How can a company accept before hand an unstandard ID which is not an ID which they cannot even see because there is no reasonable resolution photo of the ID which is not an ID?
I love the fact that you are ignoring that you are a time thief and that you've lied suggesting that Gebbit was hacked.
Honestly I would want a clear photo id, that piece of paper could be anything, or his mothers paper back ID.
Who does paper ID's anymore? They are long gone. Its all photo id.
Who does paper ID's anymore? They are long gone. Its all photo id.
Who does paper IDs? Scammers who are afraid of being exposed. They will send in low res images 10 times and then begin to threaten you with harassment and lies about your company if you don't pay the extortion.
But that isn't a photo ID anyway. It's a car registration. He should have sent in whatever ID he uses to drive that registered car.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
Right. They didn't pay you and now you're thinking about community's wellness and protecting other members.
But you weren't bothered about it as long as you were getting paid.
I am so grateful that you're here to watch over us.
Thank you.
I told you I was wrong at first, and I'm sorry.
*sigh* waste of time.
Thanks for warning people that if they scam Gebbit they will get the Small treatment
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
let me get this straight, you want your payment isnt it? so rather than this case is left on the middle of nowhere, i suggest you to submit them the picture of your work that you done (if you havent submitted it ) and provide an ID picture with higher quality , if you havent done anything suspiscious, it should not be very hard to provide higher quality ID
I want to come into an agreement with them.
Send their ID, then I send mine.
OR
Send the BTC and problem resolved.
if you wanted to play like a hot headed kindergarten child, then feel free to do it, i doubt gebbit would want to present their ID, an owner of an exchanger would want to keep anonimous, you know even the top volume exchanger btc-e have been operating in anonimous state until now
Then if I'm working for an anonymous company, why should my anonymity be breached?
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
let me get this straight, you want your payment isnt it? so rather than this case is left on the middle of nowhere, i suggest you to submit them the picture of your work that you done (if you havent submitted it ) and provide an ID picture with higher quality , if you havent done anything suspiscious, it should not be very hard to provide higher quality ID
I want to come into an agreement with them.
Send their ID, then I send mine.
OR
Send the BTC and problem resolved.
if you wanted to play like a hot headed kindergarten child, then feel free to do it, i doubt gebbit would want to present their ID, an owner of an exchanger would want to keep anonimous, you know even the top volume exchanger btc-e have been operating in anonimous state until now
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
let me get this straight, you want your payment isnt it? so rather than this case is left on the middle of nowhere, i suggest you to submit them the picture of your work that you done (if you havent submitted it ) and provide an ID picture with higher quality , if you havent done anything suspiscious, it should not be very hard to provide higher quality ID
I want to come into an agreement with them.
Send their ID, then I send mine.
OR
Send the BTC and problem resolved.
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
let me get this straight, you want your payment isnt it? so rather than this case is left on the middle of nowhere, i suggest you to submit them the picture of your work that you done (if you havent submitted it ) and provide an ID picture with higher quality , if you havent done anything suspiscious, it should not be very hard to provide higher quality ID
Worked for lesser hours?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
There is never gonna be a conclusion for this
as expected from both sided is a hot headed type which claims to be correct while the other one is wrong
small claim to have done the job and worked as the minimum hours agreement ( no solid proof for this )
Gebbit claim that small didnt work as the agreement and did the last work after his payment is withheld ( again no proof for this only a claim from gebbit )
Small in the end you didn't send anything except one picture which showed you had lied about having done the work you said you did. The proof was not only that you didn't send the work but that the homepage had changed showing that you had done that one picture only after I withheld pay. And withholding pay was part of the agreement.
in the end because there is no solid proof of which one is lying, then this matter will keep on stucking at this pace
Gebbit has proof that I did the last picture after payment was withheld.
But, I told him that I'll be finishing the rest of the pictures and sent it to him on the time he
requested it ALONG a message stating that they'll be claiming my accounts.
And then, said that he'll be paying after I sent it.
After a reply with all the accounts, they asked me to provide ID.
it was last minute that they asked for ID, and never provided theirs.
Worked for lesser hours?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
There is never gonna be a conclusion for this
as expected from both sided is a hot headed type which claims to be correct while the other one is wrong
small claim to have done the job and worked as the minimum hours agreement ( no solid proof for this )
Gebbit claim that small didnt work as the agreement and did the last work after his payment is withheld ( again no proof for this only a claim from gebbit )
Small in the end you didn't send anything except one picture which showed you had lied about having done the work you said you did. The proof was not only that you didn't send the work but that the homepage had changed showing that you had done that one picture only after I withheld pay. And withholding pay was part of the agreement.
in the end because there is no solid proof of which one is lying, then this matter will keep on stucking at this pace
Frankly, I was doing a job.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
they claimed that you have done job with lesser hour as you said
and they ask for your photo with higher resolution
it seems like you havent provided it, do provide it, your picture is in a pretty bad resolution for this gadget era, it looks like it was taken in 90's
Worked for lesser hours?
How could he say this?
The outcome is perfect and the volume of Gebbit is doing great.
I am not paid for even an hour, though he paid all the other
scrappy marketers in full though they didn't follow Gebbit's instructions either.
Why should I be treated in another way?
I heard Gebbit had only one user so what did the hackers expect to gain? Even if the hack really happened, and I doubt that, there wasn't much to be stolen.
Calling them a scam is a bit harsh because they were paying you for some time, just refused the last payment, am I right?
Calling them a scam is a bit harsh because they were paying you for some time, just refused the last payment, am I right?
Honestly I would want a clear photo id, that piece of paper could be anything, or his mothers paper back ID.
Who does paper ID's anymore? They are long gone. Its all photo id.
Who does paper ID's anymore? They are long gone. Its all photo id.
Frankly, I was doing a job.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
they claimed that you have done job with lesser hour as you said
and they ask for your photo with higher resolution
it seems like you havent provided it, do provide it, your picture is in a pretty bad resolution for this gadget era, it looks like it was taken in 90's
It doesnt mean that dont pay him or called him scammer if he said more hours. Both can negociate it and pay him atleast what he did.
I dont know what is the problem with the photos, these are looking good, If you can identify him then i dont think that there is problem with the photo?
in here is the evidence that gebbit presented i guess
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/only-one-user-and-already-trouble-should-i-pay-the-extortion-986642
the photo clearly show his face but not the document that he was holding, it seems to be really out of focus, i dont know what kind of document is it but i can say that the picture is surely not focus
Frankly, I was doing a job.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
they claimed that you have done job with lesser hour as you said
and they ask for your photo with higher resolution
it seems like you havent provided it, do provide it, your picture is in a pretty bad resolution for this gadget era, it looks like it was taken in 90's
It doesnt mean that dont pay him or called him scammer if he said more hours. Both can negociate it and pay him atleast what he did.
I dont know what is the problem with the photos, these are looking good, If you can identify him then i dont think that there is problem with the photo?
Frankly, I was doing a job.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
they claimed that you have done job with lesser hour as you said
and they ask for your photo with higher resolution
it seems like you havent provided it, do provide it, your picture is in a pretty bad resolution for this gadget era, it looks like it was taken in 90's
Karma, it can be a bitch.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
Right. They didn't pay you and now you're thinking about community's wellness and protecting other members.
But you weren't bothered about it as long as you were getting paid.
I am so grateful that you're here to watch over us.
Thank you.
I told you I was wrong at first, and I'm sorry.
*sigh* waste of time.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
Right. They didn't pay you and now you're thinking about community's wellness and protecting other members.
But you weren't bothered about it as long as you were getting paid.
I am so grateful that you're here to watch over us.
Thank you.
Well I don't know what to say but I will say this. I don't trust any exchange and so I don't trust them but I don't trust you either. I mean a month ago you were promoting the site and asking people to make deposits in that company. Why did you not inquire back then that whether they were a legit exchange or not?
I'll tell you why. Because you weren't worried about it since it was not you who was depositing money, right? I mean if someone had deposited and lost money in that exchange, it wasn't your problem because you were getting paid. And only that mattered to you.
And now since they don't pay you because they don't feel that you're doing a good job, all of sudden you're saying, they're not legit and they're scam and all kind of crap.
You acted very selfish and irresponsible for personal gain. You and Gebbit both make me very suspicious and I'll be very careful dealing with both of you. And frankly I don't care now whether you get paid or not.
I'll tell you why. Because you weren't worried about it since it was not you who was depositing money, right? I mean if someone had deposited and lost money in that exchange, it wasn't your problem because you were getting paid. And only that mattered to you.
And now since they don't pay you because they don't feel that you're doing a good job, all of sudden you're saying, they're not legit and they're scam and all kind of crap.
You acted very selfish and irresponsible for personal gain. You and Gebbit both make me very suspicious and I'll be very careful dealing with both of you. And frankly I don't care now whether you get paid or not.
Frankly, I was doing a job.
I was getting paid, and so I carried out instructions.
But as they got sketchier and sketchier, I did things my way and questioned them.
and I don't care that you don't care. It's funny coming from someone with a neg trust for scamming.
I agree with you though that I was selfish. I'm sorry.
But I'm not doing this just because I wasn't paid.
I'm doing this because they could do this to everyone else, no just me.
Jump to: