Pages:
Author

Topic: GekkoScience has a new pod miner, just in time for Christmas - page 12. (Read 6934 times)

member
Activity: 133
Merit: 34
My 909 was working without any flaw.
Now, after some days, I get this messages:
Quote
[2023-01-06 13:25:48.954] Started cgminer 4.12.1-wrk                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:48.955] Loaded configuration file /home/gilkane/.cgminer/cgminer.conf                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:48.956] Probing for an alive pool                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:49.173] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 8192                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:49.174] Pool 2 difficulty changed to 8192                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:49.345] Pool 1 difficulty changed to 262144                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:50.255] 0: GSF 0 - Toggling ASIC nRST to reset                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:51.494] 0: GSF 0 - R909 Bitcoin Miner (10070007)                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:51.497] Network diff set to 34.1T                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:53.394] 0: GSF 0 - set ticket to 0xfc/64 work 128/128.0                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:53.597] 0: GSF 0 - setting bauddiv : 00 61 (ftdi/2)                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:53.673] 0: GSF 0 - setting [all] frequency to 400.00MHz (400.00) (160/2/1/5)                    
 [2023-01-06 13:25:53.694] GSF 0 failure, disabling!    

Frequency was originally set on 450 in my configuration. Changed it to 400, but still the same result.

Rebooting the Raspi didn't change anything.

edit:
Now, since a while, I only got this message:
Quote
[2023-01-06 13:33:51.305] GekkoScience detect (1:11) failed to initialise (incorrect device?), resetting

Any advice where I should begin with finding the error?
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
So today I have been letting it run and letting cgminer and the pool manage the difficulty, and it is set low at 2587.  Yet somewhere along the line today, this little setup pulled a Best share of 1.15G.

 
Code:
cgminer version 4.12.1 - Started: [2023-01-03 08:12:27.546]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):3.382T (1m):3.570T (5m):3.589T (15m):3.575T (avg):3.567Th/s
 A:25203274  R:49005  HW:12163  WU:49832.5/m
 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 2.59K with stratum as user MyWallert.NPandT
 Block: 60df4130...  Diff:34.1T  Started: [16:34:05.450]  Best share: 1.15G
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [U]SB management [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: GSF 10070012: BM1397:06+ 575.00MHz T:575 P:575 (3:2)     | 99.1% WU: 96% | 2.258T / 2.229Th/s WU:31141.5/m
 1: GSH 10041663: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 97.3% WU: 98% | 89.83G / 84.13Gh/s WU: 1175.4/m
 2: GSH 10038894: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 98.4% WU: 98% | 86.88G / 84.08Gh/s WU: 1174.7/m
 3: GSF 10052154: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:445 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 299.3G / 270.0Gh/s WU: 3772.5/m
 4: GSF 10053864: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 392.4G / 298.9Gh/s WU: 4175.3/m
 5: GSF 10050104: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 359.9G / 299.3Gh/s WU: 4181.4/m
 6: GSF 10054544: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 301.3G / 301.5Gh/s WU: 4211.8/m
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
Is that a 2.26TH average speed from the R909? Nice. The fastest I've pushed one stable was 2.1TH so, you know, cool.

I have been running the last round of testing with the R909 at 600mhz and it appears stable. Difficulty is locked at 10K and it seems to be handling it.
575mhz on the R909 seems to be the sweet spot for mine though. The Best share resets every time i restart the miner.. So far the best share I have seen is with the R909 at 550mhz and it was 293M and the difficulty was at 3211.  
EDIT: I did have to turn the blue know about 1/8th Clockwise to get 600mhz to be stable otherwise the R909 would not work well above 575mhz.

Code:
cgminer version 4.12.1 - Started: [2023-01-02 18:44:28.984]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):4.040T (1m):3.779T (5m):3.681T (15m):3.670T (avg):3.671Th/s
 A:4280000  R:0  HW:2747  WU:51295.3/m
 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 10K with stratum as user bc1qwgc4p4gf6qlpv0mh95ju6rtqvlhmnwtyn87dpa.NPandT
 Block: 740932e4...  Diff:35.4T  Started: [19:49:00.595]  Best share: 4.3M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [U]SB management [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: GSF 10070012: BM1397:06+ 600.00MHz T:600 P:600 (3:2)     | 95.7% WU: 97% | 2.813T / 2.342Th/s WU:32720.5/m
 1: GSH 10041663: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 97.2% WU: 98% | 86.06G / 83.85Gh/s WU: 1171.4/m
 2: GSH 10038894: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 99.4% WU: 98% | 86.39G / 83.46Gh/s WU: 1166.0/m
 3: GSF 10052154: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:449 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 268.3G / 265.7Gh/s WU: 3711.9/m
 4: GSF 10053864: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 328.1G / 300.6Gh/s WU: 4199.6/m
 5: GSF 10050104: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 276.8G / 298.5Gh/s WU: 4169.8/m
 6: GSF 10054544: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 292.9G / 297.5Gh/s WU: 4156.0/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2023-01-02 20:16:18.754] Accepted 23d05810 Diff 468K/10000 GSF 2
 [2023-01-02 20:16:29.731] Accepted 0498d7c1 Diff 14.3K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:16:33.821] Accepted 059fe3a0 Diff 11.7K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:16:58.581] Accepted 0159b5a0 Diff 48.5K/10000 GSH 0
 [2023-01-02 20:16:59.384] Accepted 02e3922a Diff 22.7K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:17:03.497] Accepted 04fcfc43 Diff 13.1K/10000 GSH 1
 [2023-01-02 20:17:07.362] Accepted 017e3b91 Diff 43.9K/10000 GSF 1
 [2023-01-02 20:17:14.330] Accepted 0323fce4 Diff 20.9K/10000 GSF 1
 [2023-01-02 20:17:21.062] Accepted 02faca58 Diff 22K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:17:34.834] Accepted 02a5b268 Diff 24.8K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:17:47.444] Accepted 02063572 Diff 32.4K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:17:49.857] Accepted 01f438d1 Diff 33.5K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:18:01.234] Accepted 052019bb Diff 12.8K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:18:08.316] Accepted 01c339b1 Diff 37.2K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 20:18:17.076] Accepted 05934f47 Diff 11.8K/10000 GSF 0
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Is that a 2.26TH average speed from the R909? Nice. The fastest I've pushed one stable was 2.1TH so, you know, cool.
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!
Is there a general thread for Gekkoscience miners?  Not just for the  R909?

I am running 1 R9-9, 4 Compac-Fs and 2 New Pacs
All the Gekko threads are pretty close to the  top of the list so you should be able to see them.
Newpac:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47068859

Compac F:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57735149
Long ago Kano recommended that the slower original Compacs, 2Pacs & NewPacs be ran in a separate instance of cgminer and the F's & obviously the R909 in their own instance. You can of course still run them off of the same hub and code - cgminer is perfectly happy running multiple instances of itself, AIR it is due to the vastly different data rates involved with the chips and how the CPU(s) & cgminer has to process the data for them.
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
Is there a general thread for Gekkoscience miners?  Not just for the  R909?

I am running 1 R9-9, 4 Compac-Fs and 2 New Pacs

All the Gekko threads are pretty close to the  top of the list so you should be able to see them.

Newpac:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47068859

Compac F:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57735149
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
Is there a general thread for Gekkoscience miners?  Not just for the  R909?

I will mention this here since there is an R909 in the mix, but It may be better suited for a different thread. Let me know.  I tried mining the nicehash pool this morning via cgminer, and though it works, the difficulty seems to be a little much. it is very slow and the R909 seems to hang at around 89% but still hashes at around 2.5TH/s.  The Compac-Fs see to be the ones that struggle the most as a few of them will reset the frequency down to 200mhz and ramp back up.   I am running 1 R9-9, 4 Compac-Fs and 2 New Pacs with an over all hash rate of 3.1TH to as high as 4.2TH/s.  The pool settles on a difficulty of 40k and and overall it does get excepted shares, just really slow to handle them.  That being said, I was curious if anyone else had tried to mine nicehash with usb miners.  Is it worth it or is there an increased risk of damage to the miners?  Anyone have suggested difficulty for nicehash pool?

Here is what I used: NiceHash External Mining:
sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://sha256.auto.nicehash.com:9200 -u WALLET-ADDRESS.Workername -p x --gekko-newpac-freq 350 --gekko-compacf-freq 400 --gekko-r909-freq 550

I was thinking of trying it again with the --suggest-diff 20000  flag and then with --suggest-diff 10000 flag to see how those work.  I have been mining ckpool with --suggest-diff 10000 flag  to see how that went.  it seems stable just getting about half the shares than if I let it auto set the difficulty.  When I do let it auto set on ckpool it usually sets it somewhere between 2400 and 3400. 

Here is what I used to mine ckpool: 
sudo ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 -u WALLET-ADDRESS.Workername  -p x --gekko-newpac-freq 375 --gekko-compacf-freq 450 --gekko-r909-freq 575 --suggest-diff 10000

Earlier today ckpool reported these stats for my worker. These are the frequency same settings I normally run only difference is the suggested difficulty.

Code:
{
 "hashrate1m": "6.14T",
 "hashrate5m": "4.81T",
 "hashrate1hr": "3.68T",
 "hashrate1d": "3.17T",
 "hashrate7d": "1.14T",
 "lastshare": 1672677213,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 196345749,
 "bestshare": 283475270.1970135,
 "bestever": 283475270,
 "worker": [
  {

Code:
 cgminer version 4.12.1 - Started: [2023-01-02 11:04:46.777]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):3.477T (1m):3.632T (5m):3.624T (15m):3.608T (avg):3.589Th/s
 A:9450000  R:10000  HW:4260  WU:50140.9/m
 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 10K with stratum as user bc1qwgc4p4gf6qlpv0m.NPandT
 Block: 3df2368c...  Diff:35.4T  Started: [14:08:11.563]  Best share: 21M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [U]SB management [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: GSF 10070012: BM1397:06+ 575.00MHz T:575 P:575 (4:2)     | 98.7% WU: 97% | 1.991T / 2.256Th/s WU:31524.2/m
 1: GSH 10041663: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 99.8% WU: 98% | 82.56G / 83.99Gh/s WU: 1173.4/m
 2: GSH 10038894: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 98.0% WU: 98% | 88.03G / 83.83Gh/s WU: 1171.2/m
 3: GSF 10052154: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (29:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 301.0G / 270.4Gh/s WU: 3777.5/m
 4: GSF 10053864: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 290.8G / 297.1Gh/s WU: 4150.3/m
 5: GSF 10050104: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 271.5G / 299.6Gh/s WU: 4185.5/m
 6: GSF 10054544: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (29:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 415.4G / 297.7Gh/s WU: 4158.8/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2023-01-02 14:06:44.553] Accepted 048725ba Diff 14.5K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:06:56.428] Accepted 025d6339 Diff 27.7K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:07:10.289] Accepted 04fd253a Diff 13.1K/10000 GSF 4
 [2023-01-02 14:07:24.395] Accepted 0859ff5b Diff 2.01M/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:07:25.985] Accepted 0476518e Diff 14.7K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:07:30.342] Accepted 0558b45a Diff 12.3K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:07:48.383] Accepted 02d12650 Diff 23.3K/10000 GSF 4
 [2023-01-02 14:08:09.490] Accepted 0168869e Diff 46.5K/10000 GSF 3
 [2023-01-02 14:08:11.563] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block at height 770072
 [2023-01-02 14:08:25.631] Accepted 030ba34c Diff 21.5K/10000 GSF 3
 [2023-01-02 14:08:52.728] Accepted 01897353 Diff 42.6K/10000 GSF 2
 [2023-01-02 14:09:07.898] Accepted 0392977d Diff 18.3K/10000 GSH 1
 [2023-01-02 14:09:11.982] Accepted 045f91be Diff 15K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:09:13.723] Accepted 026ca67b Diff 27K/10000 GSF 0
 [2023-01-02 14:09:18.526] Accepted 40db734b Diff 259K/10000 GSF 1


legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Yep. Just like with the R606, I didn't put fan speed control on here because the fan's quiet enough even at full speed to be pretty unintrusive, so why bother with less than full speed if there's probably going to be a heat/efficiency penalty?
hero member
Activity: 539
Merit: 517
I see, that makes a lot of sense! Only one question: the pin header outputs constant 12V? So, no control at all even on DC (3-pin) fans? Because in that case, I'd get the PWM, too. But if it meant losing fan control, I'd prefer an actual DC fan whose RPM can be controlled by the miner. No reason to 'over-cool' the hashboard, if there's more noise reduction to be had, right?
It seems the miner only outputs 12v, with no control on the voltage.
You could use the Noctua NA-FC1 (link) to control a PWM fan.

I didn't play with the fan speed, because with the Noctua NF-A8 PWM, and at 525MHz, the heatsink is at 55°c; you can barely keep your finger on it. You need the fan at full blast to cool it properly.
You'll probably need to lower the frequency, to be able to lower the fan speed.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 5834
not your keys, not your coins!
Are you sure that you got the PWM fan? If so, it is now running at 100% fixed fan speed, since the R909 only outputs a 3-pin DC fan signal and Noctua PWM fans default to 100% fan speed if they get a (any) 3-pin DC fan signal.
Yes, I confirm I bought the PWM model. The PWM part isn't important for the R909, but it is the 80mm Noctua model that has the most airflow.


I see, that makes a lot of sense! Only one question: the pin header outputs constant 12V? So, no control at all even on DC (3-pin) fans? Because in that case, I'd get the PWM, too. But if it meant losing fan control, I'd prefer an actual DC fan whose RPM can be controlled by the miner. No reason to 'over-cool' the hashboard, if there's more noise reduction to be had, right?
hero member
Activity: 539
Merit: 517
Are you sure that you got the PWM fan? If so, it is now running at 100% fixed fan speed, since the R909 only outputs a 3-pin DC fan signal and Noctua PWM fans default to 100% fan speed if they get a (any) 3-pin DC fan signal.
Yes, I confirm I bought the PWM model. The PWM part isn't important for the R909, but it is the 80mm Noctua model that has the most airflow.

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 5834
not your keys, not your coins!
Got my R909 unit yesterday.

It was equipped with an Artic F8 fan, that has a good airflow : 52.7 m³/h at 22.5 dB
Replaced by a Noctua NF-A8 PWM : 55.5 m³/h at 17.7 dB
Are you sure that you got the PWM fan? If so, it is now running at 100% fixed fan speed, since the R909 only outputs a 3-pin DC fan signal and Noctua PWM fans default to 100% fan speed if they get a (any) 3-pin DC fan signal.

@sidehack does the R909 have any fan speed control at all or is it just outputting a fixed 12V? In that case, it wouldn't matter (at least in case of Noctua fans!) which type we choose.

I need to replace my fan, too, since I find it too loud (at least the type of noise it's making is annoying me, somehow).
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Got my R909 delivered today and got all my miners going except the R808 I got off of ebay appears to have pooped out. It was working then got stuck on Found 0 Chips..
...
Check it's not a software version issue - i.e. if it was working before, use the version of software from before just for the R808 and see if it's ok.
I've no idea if the R808 works with the current code.
I've run R909, R606, CompacF, NewPac, 2Pac and Compac on the new version (and you should use the new 4.12.1 version for those six)
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 2419
EIN: 82-3893490
Anyone willing to buy one or two with fiat from 419mining and sell to me for BTC? Or willing to trade 2 of these for 4 r606’s?
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
Tiny knob in the corner, same as all other Gekko sticks. Slight clockwise turn.

Ticket value confirmed message is a leftover from some early testing. Just means we understood the format of the ticket mask register assignment correctly when we reverse-engineered the protocol.

Thanks Sidehack.  The stick seems better now but just a little slow compared to the others.  I will tweak the tuning.


Here is a video of the blinking lights.  You would not think this would generate that much heat, but so far it is enough to raise the overall temp in a 500 sq ft room by 4 degrees F.  That corner went from 72 - 73 degrees to 77.7 degrees.  However the HP Power supply and the  USB hub power bricks are also putting off some heat.

https://youtu.be/ErYD_5Pi5Zc
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
Tiny knob in the corner, same as all other Gekko sticks. Slight clockwise turn.

Ticket value confirmed message is a leftover from some early testing. Just means we understood the format of the ticket mask register assignment correctly when we reverse-engineered the protocol.
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
If it's running slow, best bet is probably pull it, adjust the voltage up a little, and plug it back in.
How do you adjust the voltage on a compac-F?  I do not see a dial.



Also I just got a notice of Ticket Value confirmed after 5000 nonces..   what does that mean?  - it looked to be on the R909.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
If it's running slow, best bet is probably pull it, adjust the voltage up a little, and plug it back in.
jr. member
Activity: 32
Merit: 5
Got my R909 delivered today and got all my miners going except the R808 I got off of ebay appears to have pooped out. It was working then got stuck on Found 0 Chips.. But that is not the point of this post.
I have to keep an eye on the Compac-F (item 5) as it appears to be sluggish. I was reporting 35%  until I captured this output. Right when I chose copy it jumped to 100% but as you can see the hash is way lower than the other compac-f (3, 4 and 6).  With this setup though I have seen the overall 5s hash shoot as high as 3.799T.

Now to start saving $$ for another R909.


Code:
cgminer version 4.12.1 - Started: [2022-12-30 15:12:45.297]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):3.215T (1m):3.442T (5m):2.976T (15m):1.703T (avg):3.212Th/s
 A:464622  R:39064  HW:355  WU:44943.4/m
 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 2.42K with stratum as user USER.NPandT
 Block: 68b3a9c7...  Diff:35.4T  Started: [15:13:51.054]  Best share: 262K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[U]SB management [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: GSF 10070012: BM1397:06+ 550.00MHz T:550 P:550 (3:2)     |  100% WU:^96% | 2.294T / 2.134Th/s WU:29835.9/m
 1: GSH 10041663: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 99.1% WU:^95% | 81.85G / 80.95Gh/s WU: 1130.9/m
 2: GSH 10038894: BM1387:02+ 375.00MHz T:375 P:375 (100:50)  | 98.8% WU:^94% | 83.98G / 80.72Gh/s WU: 1127.8/m
 3: GSF 10052154: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:445 (28:14)   |  100% WU:^98% | 272.1G / 231.0Gh/s WU: 3227.6/m
 4: GSF 10053864: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 405.9G / 284.4Gh/s WU: 3973.2/m
 5: GSF 10050104: BM1397:01+ 440.00MHz T:440 P:347 (28:15)   |  100% WU: 58% | 119.0G / 134.0Gh/s WU: 1872.6/m
 6: GSF 10054544: BM1397:01+ 450.00MHz T:450 P:450 (28:14)   |  100% WU:100% | 339.5G / 270.1Gh/s WU: 3775.4/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2022-12-30 15:23:31.244] Accepted 10ae7164 Diff 3.93K/2422 GSF 4
 [2022-12-30 15:23:34.321] 5: GSF 3 - setting [all] frequency to 420.00MHz (420.00) (168/2/1/5)
 [2022-12-30 15:23:34.322] 5: GSF 3 - new frequency 415.00MHz -> 420.00MHz
 [2022-12-30 15:23:38.089] 5: GSF 3 - setting [all] frequency to 425.00MHz (425.00) (170/2/1/5)
 [2022-12-30 15:23:38.091] 5: GSF 3 - new frequency 420.00MHz -> 425.00MHz
 [2022-12-30 15:23:42.391] 5: GSF 3 - setting [all] frequency to 430.00MHz (430.00) (172/2/1/5)
 [2022-12-30 15:23:42.393] 5: GSF 3 - new frequency 425.00MHz -> 430.00MHz
 [2022-12-30 15:23:43.882] Accepted 1a8fdabb Diff 2.47K/2422 GSF 0
 [2022-12-30 15:23:47.545] 5: GSF 3 - setting [all] frequency to 435.00MHz (435.00) (174/2/1/5)
 [2022-12-30 15:23:47.546] 5: GSF 3 - new frequency 430.00MHz -> 435.00MHz
 [2022-12-30 15:23:48.225] Accepted 17b81fcb Diff 2.76K/2422 GSF 2
 [2022-12-30 15:23:48.794] Accepted 06bbbbce Diff 9.73K/2422 GSF 0
 [2022-12-30 15:23:51.762] Accepted 0535c27c Diff 12.6K/2422 GSF 2
 [2022-12-30 15:23:52.555] 5: GSF 3 - setting [all] frequency to 440.00MHz (440.00) (176/2/1/5)
 [2022-12-30 15:23:52.557] 5: GSF 3 - new frequency 435.00MHz -> 440.00MHz
legendary
Activity: 3304
Merit: 8633
Crypto Swap Exchange

As reported in my pool discord #gekko channel, I've run 2xR909 and 2xCompacF on a single RPi4 and it uses about 50% of the 400% of CPU.

thank you for the note...
i was actually planning to run 2x r909 and 2x hubs on my rpi4 with 6 compacf sticks in total...
could this work well, what do you think? Roll Eyes
Let me know how it goes Smiley

on my rpi4 are now 2 r909 and 2 gekko hubs with a total of 4 compacf sticks connected
the performance is also impressive Smiley

Code:
cgminer version 4.12.1 - Started: [2022-12-24 11:22:54.187]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):5.025T (1m):5.340T (5m):5.293T (15m):5.254T (avg):5.145Th/s
 A:8849622  R:2850  HW:2208  WU:71879.2/m
 Connected to solo.ckpool.org diff 2.85K with stratum as user cygan
 Block: 1dbb8e6f...  Diff:35.4T  Started: [13:13:09.645]  Best share: 7.62M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [U]SB management [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 0: GSF 10051796: BM1397:01+ 525.00MHz T:525 P:525 (24:12) |  100% WU:100% | 298.7G / 316.7Gh/s WU: 4424.9/m
 1: GSF 10051619: BM1397:01+ 525.00MHz T:515 P:525 (24:12) |  100% WU:100% | 316.5G / 347.5Gh/s WU: 4854.7/m
 2: GSF 10053622: BM1397:01+ 525.00MHz T:525 P:525 (24:12) |  100% WU:100% | 290.3G / 344.1Gh/s WU: 4807.7/m
 3: GSF 10053618: BM1397:01+ 525.00MHz T:515 P:525 (24:12) |  100% WU:100% | 368.8G / 343.2Gh/s WU: 4794.8/m
 4: GSF 10070003: BM1397:06+ 525.00MHz T:515 P:521 (4:2)   | 88.7% WU:^84% | 2.109T / 1.783Th/s WU:24908.5/m
 5: GSF 10070009: BM1397:06+ 525.00MHz T:515 P:525 (4:2)   | 98.5% WU:^95% | 1.613T / 2.010Th/s WU:28088.4/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pages:
Jump to: