Pages:
Author

Topic: GekkoScience is now dabbling with 16nm ASICs for new designs - page 38. (Read 76816 times)

sr. member
Activity: 475
Merit: 265
Ooh La La, C'est Zoom!
Would anyone be terribly upset if I did not build a stickminer around this chip? Interfacing to the ASIC directly kinda sucks, and the minimum buck voltage is at the top end of what's likely the practical range for the chip.

It'd be better to use a proper interface chip, but that's kinda wasteful without multiple ASICs. Of course, multiple ASICs also adds to the cost. Doesn't double the cost of course. I don't know how much it'd add.

So, what's a general consensus - a two- or three-chip stickminer (for, say, nominally $35 or $40 versus the original Compac's $25) or no stickminer at all?

sounds like a great idea. I'm definitely interested. the compac I have is still hashing away mining dust, but contributing none the less.

- zed
sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 250
It'll be built off the well-tested BM1384 Compac power design, with some improvements to improve stability at extreme overclocking, and with an entirely new controls set that should allow for temperature monitoring and software voltage adjustment.


Oh boy, cant wait to see what I can do with this. Had a bunch of fun pushing the 1384 compac with that huge modded heatsink with a fan. If you can build it....I can push it to the edge! GL
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
I refuse to make anything with fixed specs, so a USB miner would be downvoltable and downclockable to run on a stock USB port. Because of buck losses and control overhead it won't be at its most efficient operating point down there, but it should still run. The BM1384 Compac could run off a 500mA port, or it could be pushed to 2.5A if you wanted.

Yeah I'd shoot for a stock power draw of about 220W DC per S1 board. When you figure in the fan and stuff, and PSU losses, you're looking at a bit over 500W wall. So not as quiet as an S3 but certainly quieter than an S5. I also intend to put PCIe jacks in the right place to still be compatible with an S3 housing. USB cabling internally will be the only worry there.

Nobody ever said a 250W board doing 10TH. That kind of thing is probably two years away at best.

I know just talk i wouldn't care as long it would be worth using not priced  like bitmian shit and  i know you can make it run better you have .I never said you said that Smiley . Just talk
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
I wish had could get a good supply of Chips . i don't btc farm directly any more but would if he could get the chips , I gpu mine now , and doing good .

Same here,3 380's & 1 390 mining eth & other coins Smiley

What's going on in China?Huh I miss something???

crack down on BTC  they can't trade in china with the big banks and money processor, citizen are a loud to have coins but trading them might get them in big trouble. it sad to be under that kind of controll i'd rather have high prices and be free then  be told i can't do this or that if i do im killed or much less locked up .  

and my little GPU farm is growing i getting one two more at the end of month 3 RX470 2 R7 370  i kind of got Swed on, I trusted some one I  could have two 4 gb for the same price, one r9 280 that's the impressive one it all most does what a Rx480 8gb does no lie with silent army kernels, I'll mine Zcash til it dies if it does then back to ETH by die drop below eth prices and settle at xmr prices .
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
I refuse to make anything with fixed specs, so a USB miner would be downvoltable and downclockable to run on a stock USB port. Because of buck losses and control overhead it won't be at its most efficient operating point down there, but it should still run. The BM1384 Compac could run off a 500mA port, or it could be pushed to 2.5A if you wanted.

Yeah I'd shoot for a stock power draw of about 220W DC per S1 board. When you figure in the fan and stuff, and PSU losses, you're looking at a bit over 500W wall. So not as quiet as an S3 but certainly quieter than an S5. I also intend to put PCIe jacks in the right place to still be compatible with an S3 housing. USB cabling internally will be the only worry there.

Nobody ever said a 250W board doing 10TH. That kind of thing is probably two years away at best.
hero member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 943
I'd be more keen for a pod miner but I'll take anything that sidehack puts out Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
I wish had could get a good supply of Chips . i don't btc farm directly any more but would if he could get the chips , I gpu mine now , and doing good .

Same here,3 380's & 1 390 mining eth & other coins Smiley

What's going on in China?Huh I miss something???
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
My preference would be 250watt boards for the old S1's. I'd think that would give the most cost effective deployment possible.
'


and does 10 th i would invert in two or three but that's dreaming now with what may happen in china, i always knew the GOV controlled it all there, but it's worse then i thought .
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
I wish had could get a good supply of Chips . i don't btc farm directly any more but would if he could get the chips , I gpu mine now , and doing good .
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1129
Bitcoin FTW!
I'll be working up a test board which is effectively a 2-chip USB miner. If it works well enough (and can be cost-effective) I'll look into paring it down to a usable stickminer size, ideally same as the BM1384 Compac. Two chips would put it in the same power range but with probably 3-5 times the hashrate.
Sounds very interesting, would such a miner require a more powerful USB port? I remember one Bitfury-based dual-chip USB miner a few years ago that didn't run for me because some of my USB ports didn't provide sufficient power. Still, I love dual-chip designs, and even if it does need a stronger USB port, I'm willing to fork over more money Smiley
member
Activity: 125
Merit: 12
My preference would be 250watt boards for the old S1's. I'd think that would give the most cost effective deployment possible.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
I'll be working up a test board which is effectively a 2-chip USB miner. If it works well enough (and can be cost-effective) I'll look into paring it down to a usable stickminer size, ideally same as the BM1384 Compac. Two chips would put it in the same power range but with probably 3-5 times the hashrate.
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 621
No, the auction sticks are a real thing and will go out in the next couple weeks.

Sweet, got a tad confused. But yes a multi chip USB would be a great addition to the USB collection. Ill have to change the current setup now though  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1848
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
No, the auction sticks are a real thing and will go out in the next couple weeks.
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 621
Multi-chip USB stick is good for me aswell.  Grin

Does that mean the auction sticks are now a no go? Would the equivalent value be put towards the new USB sticks?
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Hello. This is my first post in this forum.

I do not care if I get multiple sticks or one pod miner. I'll take what will come sooner. So for me, if the stickminer come sooner than pod - Build it!
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3614
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
2-3 chip stick miners works for me.
legendary
Activity: 3612
Merit: 2506
Evil beware: We have waffles!
I vote yes for the 2-3 chip stick as well.
As you said it is the least $$ risk for you, good for the community, and at least would prove to BitFury that you can do it right.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
I really hope this pod miner / usb stick comes to life.  I want new miner!! lol.
legendary
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7849
'The right to privacy matters'
Yep, you've been pessimistic about it for months. Noted. I, however, choose the other route because it's simultaneously gonna be awesome for the community and I don't go bankrupt if I'm right.

So anyway. The stickminer question. Let's discuss that instead of everything else that's already been rolled over a couple times.

two-three chip  running 90 to 140gh correct?

please build it
Pages:
Jump to: