Sane gamblers choose higher odds one, unless that site has other advantages, like directbet, its odds are lowest, but they don't require
username and password, direct deposit or withdraw from btc address.
By odds that are obviously different, like $5 and every other bookie is offering $3.50.
shapeshiftscam -- we don't require any personal verifiable signup material. It's very easy and completely anonymous.
IMO you cannot hold the user responsible for this. YOU are the operator and YOU are offering the odds. In 2 x 2 Event it's not even such a diff for the outsider team. It could be obviously wrong for you, because you are comparing it with somewhere else till user is looking at YOUR site.
Otherwise I need to loose my time on every single bet to check it on other bookies and I guess in many cases I will choose those other bookies too.
It isn't that special of a condition - a lot of sportsbooks have something like that. Sometimes errors are obvious, and it would be way to costly for ghostbook to pay it out. If I accidentally mix up my odds, and give the heavy favorite @10, and the underdog @1.1, that would be an obvious error. I think your example (ghostbook) is a bad one. For one of my arbs, coinbet24 thought differently and offered @3.5 on an event where cloudbet offered @2.5. It wasn't an error though, and they just thought differently of the games.
yeah I think ghostbook didn't explain that well
in general getting higher odds isn't exploiting , I have bet on many matches where the odds are higher clearly in one book over others
but that's not exploiting , it's just how the markets work and that's why we don't only have one bookie to place our bets at
when people are betting heavily on a specific team on a specific bookie obviously that team will have low odds and the other options will have higher odds
but in other bookie bettors may be going heavily on a draw for example , which means the favor team will have higher odds in this book
