Gigamining / Teramining - page 47. | Bitcointalksearch.org

kjlimo

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1031

Quote from: EskimoBob on January 05, 2013, 04:17:50 PM

Sorry for asking for something as obvious as this but has ANYONE actually bothered to call this law firm and ask'd for this guy?
He obviously can not handle e-mails. Maybe he can answer a phone... if he even exists?

It is pretty amazing that this question wasn't asked until page 88 of posts, haha.

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Sorry for asking for something as obvious as this but has ANYONE actually bothered to call this law firm and ask'd for this guy?
He obviously can not handle e-mails. Maybe he can answer a phone... if he even exists?

S3052

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dishwara on January 05, 2013, 11:06:07 AM

gigamining is a company registered in USA as per gigavps.
If they have registered the company means then they must be already showed the details to USA & world if it's an international company.
They are the bond issuers, who FIRST has to give the details to the client, when clients approach them to buy bonds & asks client details when clients wants to buy their bonds.

When gigavps gave details of his company, when the clients (WE) bought bonds from them?
Its the shop owners who has to show who they are & what they selling - first, not the client who wants to buy.

+1

dishwara

legendary

Activity: 1855

Merit: 1016

gigamining is a company registered in USA as per gigavps.
If they have registered the company means then they must be already showed the details to USA & world if it's an international company.
They are the bond issuers, who FIRST has to give the details to the client, when clients approach them to buy bonds & asks client details when clients wants to buy their bonds.

When gigavps gave details of his company, when the clients (WE) bought bonds from them?
Its the shop owners who has to show who they are & what they selling - first, not the client who wants to buy.

xXHannibalXx

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

3 days ago i sent a new email to your lawyer and he has still not answered!

kjlimo

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1031

Quote from: SAC on January 04, 2013, 01:13:54 PM

Quote from: kjlimo on January 04, 2013, 12:41:24 PM

Quote from: PsychoticBoy on January 04, 2013, 10:11:13 AM

I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)

Riddle me this: if both countries require you to obtain data from the other person prior to sending data to the other person, then who sends data first?

Does this need to be an in person same time exchange?

Surely, someone has gone through this before...

Or are the rules written in a way to outlaw something without "outlawing the something? Huh

"

haha, head explodes

There it is in bold in case you still cannot read the person requesting the information sends their data first according to those words.

I think I follow... so what if (feel free to stop me if the US doesn't have these rules) the US requires the person in the EU to send their data before the person in the US can respond to the person in the EU's request for data, so that they can respond to the person in the US's request for data?

I don't see why b/c the person in the US asks first, they need to give first, or is that the rule?

I see the person's request from the EU to the person in the US just as much a "request" as the person in the US's request for the data from the person in the EU's data?

Does the order matter? or is it that the US just doesn't have this rule, thus making the EU request need to be satisfied first?

SAC

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: kjlimo on January 04, 2013, 12:41:24 PM

Quote from: PsychoticBoy on January 04, 2013, 10:11:13 AM

I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)

Riddle me this: if both countries require you to obtain data from the other person prior to sending data to the other person, then who sends data first?

Does this need to be an in person same time exchange?

Surely, someone has gone through this before...

Or are the rules written in a way to outlaw something without "outlawing the something? Huh

"

haha, head explodes

There it is in bold in case you still cannot read the person requesting the information sends their data first according to those words.

Quote from: BurtW on January 04, 2013, 01:06:45 PM

I believe that technically you would be sending the requested information to his attorney and all the information you should need on/about the attorney is here:

Law Office of Carlos M Fleites P A
407 Lincoln Rd Ste 12-E
Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3028

http://www.floridabar.org/names.nsf/0D856BE6EA32ECE1052576D9006CBABB/6E273FF94FF8E12785256A83007AEED9?OpenDocument

Where would you every get that idea a lawyer is a representative of one of the parties involved not the main actor of the process. That would be the person/company they represent whose information would be needed as they pass received information on to their client and in case you have not noticed the lawyer in question here is listed nowhere on that law offices website anyways, so how the hell you supposed to get his information from it? And your certainly not going to get any information from Google on the supposed lawyer either.

https://www.google.ca/search?q=Lawyer++Quentin+Page&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&gbv=1&sei=4SDnULT1GsmSqgG-qYDAAg

I went ten pages deep on that puppy and there are two lawyers in florida with that first name a Quentin Fairchild in Fort Myers and a Quentin Till in Jacksonville.

BurtW

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1137

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.

I believe that technically you would be sending the requested information to his attorney and all the information you should need on/about the attorney is here:

Law Office of Carlos M Fleites P A
407 Lincoln Rd Ste 12-E
Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3028

http://www.floridabar.org/names.nsf/0D856BE6EA32ECE1052576D9006CBABB/6E273FF94FF8E12785256A83007AEED9?OpenDocument

kjlimo

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1031

Quote from: PsychoticBoy on January 04, 2013, 10:11:13 AM

I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)

Riddle me this: if both countries require you to obtain data from the other person prior to sending data to the other person, then who sends data first?

Does this need to be an in person same time exchange?

Surely, someone has gone through this before...

Or are the rules written in a way to outlaw something without "outlawing the something? Huh

"

haha, head explodes

S3052

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1000

Quote from: PsychoticBoy on January 04, 2013, 10:11:13 AM

I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)

the same applies to me.

gigiamining, please send all the documents to me

PsychoticBoy

donator

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1010

Parental Advisory Explicit Content

I also need that info to justify the fact that you have to send you own personal data to his Lawyer (EU Law forbit me to send data outside EU without having the data of the counterparty),
and in case of Identity Theft that I can sue James Gibson (in case of Identity Theft etc)

kjlimo

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1031

Quote from: PsychoticBoy on January 04, 2013, 09:39:02 AM

Since you are playing this game by Law, I will play along with you.

I have to pay Tax over the dividend and since you stated that you have got a Registred company,
I need the following information from you, gigavps/James Gibson:
- A copy of your ID or Passport
- proof of residence
- registration documents of your vps sollutions company
- all this must be sighned by you, personal

I need this info from you, otherwise I cant do this the legal way.

Send this info to [email protected]

Thanks

Why do you need this to pay Tax on a dividend?

I'm guessing the IRS won't turn away your tax check you send and any dividends reported on your tax forms.

He's trying to comply with the regulations that are put on the security issuer to deliver a 1099 which will include the dividend amounts which will assist you in getting these numbers correct.

I wouldn't think you need any more information than that, but I could be wrong.

I'm guessing the 1099 will include potentially some identifying info that may cover some of your request if your request is legit.

PsychoticBoy

donator

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1010

Parental Advisory Explicit Content

Since you are playing this game by Law, I will play along with you.

I have to pay Tax over the dividend and since you stated that you have got a Registred company,
I need the following information from you, gigavps/James Gibson:
- A copy of your ID or Passport
- proof of residence
- registration documents of your vps sollutions company
- all this must be sighned by you, personal

I need this info from you, otherwise I cant do this the legal way.

Send this info to [email protected]

Thanks

jamesg

vip

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

AKA: gigavps

Quote from: szuetam on January 04, 2013, 04:23:03 AM

Have you get some update on this list:
https://virtualprocessingsolutions.com/glbse-records
??
When I checked first time I wasn't there but:
from <[email protected]> 13.12.2012 I get following answer:
Don't worry about it, you'll be sent out on the next update.

Additional problem is that that i lost exact payment address and I know only that it was one of more of twenty of mine addresses I'm using so checking me on the list is painful

Please PM me or email me at the email below and I will search through the records I have via your email address.

james at gigamining dot com

Best,
James

szuetam

sr. member

Activity: 377

Merit: 253

Have you get some update on this list:
https://virtualprocessingsolutions.com/glbse-records
??

When I checked first time I wasn't there but:
from <[email protected]> 13.12.2012 I get following answer:
Don't worry about it, you'll be sent out on the next update.

Additional problem is that that i lost exact payment address and I know only that it was one of more of twenty of mine addresses I'm using so checking me on the list is painful

conspirosphere.tk

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 1064

Bitcoin is antisemitic

Quote from: SAC on January 03, 2013, 04:33:17 PM

Logic and fairness were never the point of this operation, filling gigavps pockets with your btc was the goal and still is at every opportunity he can find to do so.

What is funny is that there are still some suckers defending Giga while waiting for their coins (or losers hoping that playing nice guy with him will get them something back) Lips sealed

SAC

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: sunnankar on January 03, 2013, 02:49:33 PM

Quote from: S3052 on January 03, 2013, 01:14:01 PM

This is an insane debacle for Gigamining. I have gotten confirmations from all other asset owners without any weird verification, and only Gigamining is creating such a mess. I speculate that they do not have the funds to pay back and hence make it so difficult to claim the shares.[/color]

-1

I would not have gotten myself into the legally thorny mess Gigamining did in the first place but if I had gotten into the mess then I would probably get out of it in a similar manner. I do not think the issue is so much insolvency as being in a delicate situation and attempting to work it out in a logical and fair manner.

Logic and fairness were never the point of this operation, filling gigavps pockets with your btc was the goal and still is at every opportunity he can find to do so.

sunnankar

legendary

Activity: 1031

Merit: 1000

Quote from: S3052 on January 03, 2013, 01:14:01 PM

This is an insane debacle for Gigamining. I have gotten confirmations from all other asset owners without any weird verification, and only Gigamining is creating such a mess. I speculate that they do not have the funds to pay back and hence make it so difficult to claim the shares.[/color]

-1

I would not have gotten myself into the legally thorny mess Gigamining did in the first place but if I had gotten into the mess then I would probably get out of it in a similar manner. I do not think the issue is so much insolvency as being in a delicate situation and attempting to work it out in a logical and fair manner.

S3052

legendary

Activity: 2100

Merit: 1000

Quote from: deeplink on January 03, 2013, 10:42:54 AM

Sounds like this mysterious lawyer should learn how to operate an email client first, before getting himself involved into more complicated technical issues like Bitcoin mining.

+1 I agree

This is an insane debacle for Gigamining. I have gotten confirmations from all other asset owners without any weird verification, and only Gigamining is creating such a mess. I speculate that they do not have the funds to pay back and hence make it so difficult to claim the shares.

deeplink

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

In cryptography we trust

Sounds like this mysterious lawyer should learn how to operate an email client first, before getting himself involved into more complicated technical issues like Bitcoin mining.

Topic: Gigamining / Teramining - page 47. (Read 216459 times)