Again thx for the answer.
Giga, thx for at least an answer.
You are welcome.
I had read everything you wrote, I still don't see how this answers my questions.
I do not believe this to be the case, so I will help you some more.
So you decided to simply break the existing bond contract by changing the contract the way it pleasures you (request all kind of funny stuff and silently pass on liabilities to a LLC).
http://gigamining.com/faq.htmlAlso you claim this is to make sure to not pay the wrong guys (or to sue it back in case false claims are made), yet you ignore every kind of proof of ownership shown to you.
The PII (personally identifiable information) is required for multiple reasons including complying with federal laws. In the US, federal, state and local laws supersede any contract. The tax identification number is required to file the proper paperwork at year's end.
You could at least ask for additional claims with only email/btc address/bond amount (without making any guarantees yet), and look if the total amount of claimed bonds is higher than the actual bonds, and of course how many non unique claims there are. Then start from there. There probably still are cases where there's no better solution than requesting id's to scare of scammers but probably most wouldn't have to go through this hassle.
Please see my previous statements.
I see your point but most of this isn't news for me and there are questions left open.
1) Afaik nobody knew they were dealing with an llc (please anybody correct me if I'm wrong here). I assumed doing business with a natural person. But whatever, I care way more about point two.
2) What I didn't know is that you also need the PII to comply to the law and thereby to run this thing legit. I won't bitch now about the fact that this wasn't that important when gigamining started because I think it's your good right to stop exposing yourself to the risks involved by running this thing non legit.
But making this thing legit also comes with changes which are incompatible with the existing contracts. Enforcing the new terms on existing bond holders is THAT main thing I'm so pissed about. I understand that you want to go legit, but not that you force everybody to make that switch with you.
In my opinion the only way to keep your name clean and make people happy is to comply with current contracts while going legit, and the only way to do this I can think of is to offer a buy back for those who don't want to participate under the new terms.
Yes I've read that there won't be a buy back but this had to be said.
I've sent my emails to you directly, not Quentin.
I didn't realize that was the case and I apologize for not responding.
Thx. Please note that when I wrote the emails, I didn't know that you need the PII to comply to the law. Please see point 2.
This pretty much. 300 bonds down the toilet, awweesome
.
This certainly does not. Please file the claim and you will be paid.
Sadly yes as I'm not willing to participate in this under the new terms. Toilet pretty much.
Note: Just out of curiosity, someone interested in buying the right to claim 300 bonds?
This is not advisable. Please see the quote below.
Finally, since no unique identification exists for outstanding agreements, ALL CURRENT BENEFICIAL ASSIGNEES ARE STRONGLY ADVISED NOT TO ENGAGE IN ANY TRANSFER, SALE, OR ASSIGNMENT OF THESE AGREEMENTS OUTSIDE OF GLBSE, AS IT MAY RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY AND SERVICE SUCH AGREEMENTS.
Yes, and this also is only in theory, but there would be no way of ever knowing about it.