Topic: Global warming explained once and for all. IPCC says: nothing to worry about (Read 641 times)
June 10, 2020, 11:46:59 AM
^^^ But Eskimos would move to warmer lands if they could only break their habits of cold-land life. I mean, back when the Northern lands were a tropical paradise, their ancestors lived like equatorial islanders.
June 09, 2020, 11:39:08 PM
....
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
Cold is an order of magnitude more deadly than an equal increase in heat.
not really
if an average comfortable temperature for humans is ~20oc (15-25)
alot more people suffer at 40 than they do at 0
inuits/eskimos live hundreds of generations at -10 but how long can people live at 50
so yea i can see the fear of temperature rise.
but the whole 'carbon effects the green house gas' stuff.. has nothing to do with ground temperatures at all
thats stratosphere talk not troposphere
it would be better to say about how the carbon falls in snow/rain and turns the ice sheets black thus making them melt thus changing the temperature and such. but being vague and saying its a greenhouse gas thing. just doesnt grasp the detail and makes things very iffy.
also the whole '0.xoc' is just not really compelling fear. especially when there is usually a 30oc swing in temperature depending on seasons. a 0.xoc just becomes a marginal statistical error probablity amount
what is more concerning is that in places near jakarta pretend the sea level rise is huge...
but actual sea level rise is only millimeters a year. but the ground subsidence is alot more. thus making it look like the sea is rising, where as the truth is the land is falling
yep indonesia pollute river water so companies grab at the underground water to bottle, wash, farm with, which cause the land to subside
too many idiots with half sciences always try to blame carbon. yet carbon is far far lower than the 1800's
the reason people dont know this. is because the measuring techniques changed in ~1960 which has offset/hidden the real value pre-1960 because the real value pre1960 was limited
if people think london is more smoggy than the 1800. then they are reading the wrong fact sheets
June 09, 2020, 07:57:49 PM
Now the media is coming out with the fact that governments and science have been trying to control global warming for some time... in unorthodox ways... like chemtrails.
First it was a “conspiracy theory,” now the mainstream media says geoengineering will fix global warming
First it was a “conspiracy theory,” now the mainstream media says geoengineering will fix global warming
It was not all that long ago when any talk about geoengineering or “chemtrails” drew ridicule from the establishment, which insisted that weather modification of any kind was just some wild “conspiracy theory.” Well, now that same establishment is openly admitting that geoengineering is real, and that it is supposedly being used to “cool” the planet from the damaging effects of “global warming.”
In a piece recently published by Bloomberg, as well as republished by MSN, a writer named Gernot Wagner lays out how blocking natural sunlight – and no, this is not satire – using damaging chemicals much like the ones emitted from a volcanic eruption can allegedly help to keep planet earth from overheating from climate change.
“Large-scale tech,” he says, can effectively “re-create the cooling effects of a volcanic eruption,” at least in theory. By releasing untold tons of sulfur dioxide, or SO2, into the stratosphere, weather modification airplanes could potentially block out enough sunlight to bring atmospheric temperatures down to where climate scientists believe they should be.
Rather than continue to try to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which could take decades to see any results, blasting the skies with SO2 would bring about changes in a matter of weeks, Wagner contends. Though “imperfect and risky,” it is apparently worth trying, much like “an experimental drug taken in a pandemic.”
Mainstream media still foolishly calling CO2 a “pollutant”
Amazingly, Wagner is also pushing the same anti-CO2 propaganda as NBC News, which declared back in early 2019 that CO2 is a “pollutant” that must be eradicated if humanity is to have any future on the planet.
In a piece recently published by Bloomberg, as well as republished by MSN, a writer named Gernot Wagner lays out how blocking natural sunlight – and no, this is not satire – using damaging chemicals much like the ones emitted from a volcanic eruption can allegedly help to keep planet earth from overheating from climate change.
“Large-scale tech,” he says, can effectively “re-create the cooling effects of a volcanic eruption,” at least in theory. By releasing untold tons of sulfur dioxide, or SO2, into the stratosphere, weather modification airplanes could potentially block out enough sunlight to bring atmospheric temperatures down to where climate scientists believe they should be.
Rather than continue to try to cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which could take decades to see any results, blasting the skies with SO2 would bring about changes in a matter of weeks, Wagner contends. Though “imperfect and risky,” it is apparently worth trying, much like “an experimental drug taken in a pandemic.”
Mainstream media still foolishly calling CO2 a “pollutant”
Amazingly, Wagner is also pushing the same anti-CO2 propaganda as NBC News, which declared back in early 2019 that CO2 is a “pollutant” that must be eradicated if humanity is to have any future on the planet.
May 22, 2020, 07:46:47 AM
....
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
Cold is an order of magnitude more deadly than an equal increase in heat.
but when nature loves the temperature of 22-27oc saying the 'average temperature of 17oc is going up by 1-2oc. doesnt seem to be a 'globe threat' but a human sweat threat
im all for the science of what caused what. but when graphs are shown as only 95% confident. and choosing a base line not based on the temperature that is actually healthiest for plant growth. kinda makes the numbers less meaningful.
take the temperature measures. they actually have graphs where it shows they tweak the numbers to have a consistent 'dry days' chart
they also have charts of 'hottest recorded day'
al of this sways to show hot hot hot data
yet if they just took data as is. and included the coldest days too. they would not be beating the drum of 'global warming' but in actual fact it would be climate change. (because the numbers for the cold has changed just as much as the hot
yep they are saying that the 1950's1980's america is hotter then say the 1850-1920's
yet for instance. the 'dustbowl' of the 1930's (hot)
yet for instance the US coldest day was recorded in alaska in 1971 (80 degree below zero) and previously in montana was 70 degrees below 0 in 1954
yep it was colder in the 1970s than it was in the 1950's than is was compared to pre industrial levels
colds getting colder hots getting hotter. = climate change not global warming
..
yes i believe many aspects are man made. such as making all the dams across the US caused water to fill in large lakes which keep the water col to not evaporate as much as it would flowing freely in creeks, streams and farmland. (dustbowl wouldnt have happened as badly in the 30's if dams were not made)
humans shifting the natural river courses for irrigation causes different area's to suddenly dry up
concrete over land(making cities) stops water soaking into land (less ground water) = less water in underground aquifers
which does impact real life stuff
california's 'salton sea' dries up because they dammed the river that used to feed it so that cities in california can tap into it instead
..
im all for actual science discovery. but not when they tweak the numbers to exacerbate the situation or make it seem more related to carbon. when the reality is infrastructure like dams, water tables, and land moisture absorption.
my research is more about how the brazilian RAIN forest being chopped down. causes negative MOISTURE impacts(RAIN) its a rainforest, not a carbon forest after all
May 22, 2020, 04:48:17 AM
....
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
Cold is an order of magnitude more deadly than an equal increase in heat.
but when nature loves the temperature of 22-27oc saying the 'average temperature of 17oc is going up by 1-2oc. doesnt seem to be a 'globe threat' but a human sweat threat
im all for the science of what caused what. but when graphs are shown as only 95% confident. and choosing a base line not based on the temperature that is actually healthiest for plant growth. kinda makes the numbers less meaningful.
take the temperature measures. they actually have graphs where it shows they tweak the numbers to have a consistent 'dry days' chart
they also have charts of 'hottest recorded day'
al of this sways to show hot hot hot data
yet if they just took data as is. and included the coldest days too. they would not be beating the drum of 'global warming' but in actual fact it would be climate change. (because the numbers for the cold has changed just as much as the hot
yep they are saying that the 1950's1980's america is hotter then say the 1850-1920's
yet for instance. the 'dustbowl' of the 1930's (hot)
yet for instance the US coldest day was recorded in alaska in 1971 (80 degree below zero) and previously in montana was 70 degrees below 0 in 1954
yep it was colder in the 1970s than it was in the 1950's than is was compared to pre industrial levels
colds getting colder hots getting hotter. = climate change not global warming
..
yes i believe many aspects are man made. such as making all the dams across the US caused water to fill in large lakes which keep the water col to not evaporate as much as it would flowing freely in creeks, streams and farmland. (dustbowl wouldnt have happened as badly in the 30's if dams were not made)
humans shifting the natural river courses for irrigation causes different area's to suddenly dry up
concrete over land(making cities) stops water soaking into land (less ground water) = less water in underground aquifers
which does impact real life stuff
california's 'salton sea' dries up because they dammed the river that used to feed it so that cities in california can tap into it instead
..
im all for actual science discovery. but not when they tweak the numbers to exacerbate the situation or make it seem more related to carbon. when the reality is infrastructure like dams, water tables, and land moisture absorption.
my research is more about how the brazilian RAIN forest being chopped down. causes negative MOISTURE impacts(RAIN) its a rainforest, not a carbon forest after all
May 21, 2020, 07:54:20 PM
....
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
...
Cold is an order of magnitude more deadly than an equal increase in heat.
May 21, 2020, 04:44:32 PM
comparing the temperature to the 1800's is a little silly.
after all in London they had the 'frost fair' where by it was so cold that the river Thames completely froze over.
sorry but thats not 'norm' level to compare against.
UK can go from -2oc for an average winter. to 28oC average summer
thats 30o normal variance. and so 1.5o is only 5% variance
but here is the funny thing.
the different charts for the last 200 years actually have this say 5% offset.
yes we should ofcourse expect 5% high temperatures than the average.
but the fture is not the only years that experienced this 5% offset to the average
its kind of funny how they can pretend that temperature change has only moved by 0.xoC
since the 1600
yet 'the little iceage' in the 1700-1900 proves otherwise
london chimney sweeps were the best business in town because everyone needed their chimneys cleaned regularly because it was always cold and they always needed their fires on
irish famine due to bad weather previous seasons causing potato rot that ruined crops for years
seems these silly graphs of 'averaged' lines that strangely only moved 0.xoc.. have made people to actually forget real history
..
and who the hell decided to choose the 1950's-80's as a base period to then say whats + or -
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
so whats to say what is healthy for the planet to grow.. vs people to live without sunburn vs frost burn
are these numbers in favour of planet or human comfort
all i know is that NEVER, EVER in the history of eternaty has this planet ever had a nice happy human loving base temperature of 17oc long term
..
im not a climate denier or a anti-science. but some of these graphs have actual flaws which do not help them
plus you gotta laugh when they say that london is more smoggy now than in the 1800's. that is like the biggest farse known to man
after all in London they had the 'frost fair' where by it was so cold that the river Thames completely froze over.
sorry but thats not 'norm' level to compare against.
UK can go from -2oc for an average winter. to 28oC average summer
thats 30o normal variance. and so 1.5o is only 5% variance
but here is the funny thing.
the different charts for the last 200 years actually have this say 5% offset.
yes we should ofcourse expect 5% high temperatures than the average.
but the fture is not the only years that experienced this 5% offset to the average
its kind of funny how they can pretend that temperature change has only moved by 0.xoC
since the 1600
yet 'the little iceage' in the 1700-1900 proves otherwise
london chimney sweeps were the best business in town because everyone needed their chimneys cleaned regularly because it was always cold and they always needed their fires on
irish famine due to bad weather previous seasons causing potato rot that ruined crops for years
seems these silly graphs of 'averaged' lines that strangely only moved 0.xoc.. have made people to actually forget real history
..
and who the hell decided to choose the 1950's-80's as a base period to then say whats + or -
plants dont like the cold. plants dont like low carbon.
so whats to say what is healthy for the planet to grow.. vs people to live without sunburn vs frost burn
are these numbers in favour of planet or human comfort
all i know is that NEVER, EVER in the history of eternaty has this planet ever had a nice happy human loving base temperature of 17oc long term
..
im not a climate denier or a anti-science. but some of these graphs have actual flaws which do not help them
plus you gotta laugh when they say that london is more smoggy now than in the 1800's. that is like the biggest farse known to man
May 21, 2020, 04:22:39 PM
Nothing to worry about what? About the temperature reaching its upper limit? How about its effect in nature? I don't think its gonna be that easy. Yes, the earth has a way to compensate for it and that might get extreme for humans. You see we are experiencing lots of abnormal phenomenon and global warming might be a part of it. It's not nothing to worry about. It kills people, it damages property. It's must not be taken for granted just because some scientists or reports says it reach its peak.
It always comes down to now. It's why people drink or smoke or eat. We crave the dopamine hit and want it now. A less intelligent animal (i.e. mouse) would starve to death in favor of dopamine.
We are asking everyone who has worked hard to stop wanting more stuff. We are asking billions in third world countries to not want what we have.
We are asking everyone to deny themselves dopamine, which goes against millions of years of evolution. It's much easier to ask the next generation to do it.
May 21, 2020, 08:29:24 AM
Nothing to worry about what? About the temperature reaching its upper limit? How about its effect in nature? I don't think its gonna be that easy. Yes, the earth has a way to compensate for it and that might get extreme for humans. You see we are experiencing lots of abnormal phenomenon and global warming might be a part of it. It's not nothing to worry about. It kills people, it damages property. It's must not be taken for granted just because some scientists or reports says it reach its peak.
May 16, 2020, 02:43:24 PM
Nothing to worry about?
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
If you were sincere, you wouldn't be on the forum. You would have done your part by ditching modern technology long ago. You'd be living like the Amish, who never really got into technology.
Amazing moment 300 Amish men lift a huge barn with their bare hands and move it across a field.
Amazing video shows about 300 Amish men working in tandem to lift an enormous shed in a rural part of the country.
One man is heard giving directions to the men as they grab the skeleton of the red farmhouse.
When viewing the spectacle from afar, the men's legs are seen sticking out from the bottom as they toil in unison to lift the enormous structure.
'You see all the feet moving?' the woman who filmed the scene says in amazement.
At one point, the men continue to move the shed but the structure is lowered toward the ground, concealing their feet.
It made it appear as if the shed was moving on its own.
In the Amish community, when one member needs help, their neighbors pitch in and lend a hand.
One man is heard giving directions to the men as they grab the skeleton of the red farmhouse.
When viewing the spectacle from afar, the men's legs are seen sticking out from the bottom as they toil in unison to lift the enormous structure.
'You see all the feet moving?' the woman who filmed the scene says in amazement.
At one point, the men continue to move the shed but the structure is lowered toward the ground, concealing their feet.
It made it appear as if the shed was moving on its own.
In the Amish community, when one member needs help, their neighbors pitch in and lend a hand.
May 16, 2020, 12:56:08 PM
Nothing to worry about?
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
I don't believe this kind of a thing. You can feel it so it must be true?
May 16, 2020, 11:17:33 AM
Nothing to worry about?
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
The climate has already changed and we have to act fast if we want to overcome the worst.
There are so many extreme changes in the temperature of my region that are not normal. You can feel the disaster without being a scientist.
May 16, 2020, 10:45:35 AM
We forgot all about global warming in the pandemic. I guess it's because the governmental powers that be finally needed to focus on something else that was false... at least for a while.
Low Solar Activity to Cause Temperatures to Plummet, Say Scientists
Low Solar Activity to Cause Temperatures to Plummet, Say Scientists
Quote from: https://www.prisonplanet.com/low-solar-activity-to-cause-temperatures-to-plummet-say-scientists.html
The Sun is entering a period of "solar minimum" that could cause temperatures to plummet by up to 2C over 20 years and trigger a global famine, according to experts.
Solar activity has entered a deep decline with scientists saying there have already been 100 days this year where the sun has displayed zero sunspots.
NASA boffins say this means that the earth could be about to experience a new "Dalton Minimum," the period between 1790 and 1830 which led to a severe prolonged cold snap and massive volcanic eruptions.
"This means were could be entering one of the deepest period of sunshine recession which could trigger long periods of cold, famine and other issues," reports the Daily Star.
The Sun has now recorded two consecutive years of record setting spotlessness, being blank 77% of the time in 2019 and 76% of the time so far this year.
This means a deep solar minimum is coming which will cause temperatures to drop drastically.
This once again serves as a reminder that the Sun is by far the most influential driver of climate and makes the impact of so-called man-made climate change look tame in comparison.
Solar activity has entered a deep decline with scientists saying there have already been 100 days this year where the sun has displayed zero sunspots.
NASA boffins say this means that the earth could be about to experience a new "Dalton Minimum," the period between 1790 and 1830 which led to a severe prolonged cold snap and massive volcanic eruptions.
"This means were could be entering one of the deepest period of sunshine recession which could trigger long periods of cold, famine and other issues," reports the Daily Star.
The Sun has now recorded two consecutive years of record setting spotlessness, being blank 77% of the time in 2019 and 76% of the time so far this year.
This means a deep solar minimum is coming which will cause temperatures to drop drastically.
This once again serves as a reminder that the Sun is by far the most influential driver of climate and makes the impact of so-called man-made climate change look tame in comparison.
October 08, 2019, 03:04:25 PM
Global warming is a scam, anyone who believes otherwise is very gullible in my opinion. Climate change has been going on since the beginning of time, Global warming is just a cover up for the crooked politicians to generate funds to be used for their own underlying agendas.
October 07, 2019, 03:26:15 PM
[snip]
-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
O, OK, so it all about the ocean now...-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
First it was the acid rains - OMG amazon jungle will be poisoned and gone by the year 2000, act now! - Tax 'em
Then was the ozone layer - OMG we all gonna get cancer, atmosphere is to thin! - Tax 'em more
Next it was the warming - OMG we all gonna boil, the atmosphere is to thick! - Tax, Tax, Tax.
And now the oceanic life - OMG we all gona... what this time? Hunker for shrimps?
When will you wake up? It's nothing but a new religion. Technocratic gibberish for the masses to accept new forms of extortions.
I'm not saying it is a bad idea to care about your surroundings. But while you do, don't force ridiculous regulations on people.
Think about this, when was the last time young generations were so, so in favour of governmental actions? When was the last time teenagers where in favour for politicians? It's a precedence due to horribly effective mind control. Don't think about 27K monitored asteroids, on a possible collision course, don't think about those that we can't monitor, do not wonder about supervolcanos and especially forget about nano-plastic in the air and glyphosate, shush.
I'm going to agree with you on the fact that I think we overestimate when it comes to the climate. People think that the world is going to be gone in the next 10 years, then 10 years after that, then 10 years after that, and so on and so forth.
At one point they'll be right.
But the only way to convince people is to truly show them real evidence and then to be RIGHT at some-point.
I don't know who or what to believe at this point.
The hole in the ozone layer was a real problem and who knows what the situation would have gotten worse had the world not come together and banned CFC's.
So every-time it is actually a lack of understanding that makes things seem inconsistent.
October 07, 2019, 11:01:42 AM
.... in reverse: from fully dumb to half dumb, to... etc, etc..
Merited!It has been said, that certain ideas and concepts were radioactive...
That's why we are here. What an amazing radioactive paradigm shift Bitcoin is.
And when the climate temperature data is blockchained, and all the "Adjustments" to that data can be tracked back to the original raw data through the blockchain...
Then you might want to believe the data is accurate, or some adjustments are questionable, but it all tracks and adds up and is historically accurate.
The Blockchain is very radioactive...
October 07, 2019, 10:55:57 AM
I don't know who or what to believe at this point.
Then I'm immediately on my way to help you figure this thing out.How about a short lecture on the subject, from yet another forgotten genius from Serbia?
Them Serbs BTW, Tesla and then this fellow... lucky them
and lucky we.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles - something to read
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GUcn07enz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztninkgZ0ws - and for the lazy ones
October 07, 2019, 10:46:48 AM
[snip]
-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
O, OK, so it all about the ocean now...-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
First it was the acid rains - OMG amazon jungle will be poisoned and gone by the year 2000, act now! - Tax 'em
Then was the ozone layer - OMG we all gonna get cancer, atmosphere is to thin! - Tax 'em more
Next it was the warming - OMG we all gonna boil, the atmosphere is to thick! - Tax, Tax, Tax.
And now the oceanic life - OMG we all gona... what this time? Hunker for shrimps?
When will you wake up? It's nothing but a new religion. Technocratic gibberish for the masses to accept new forms of extortions.
I'm not saying it is a bad idea to care about your surroundings. But while you do, don't force ridiculous regulations on people.
Think about this, when was the last time young generations were so, so in favour of governmental actions? When was the last time teenagers where in favour for politicians? It's a precedence due to horribly effective mind control. Don't think about 27K monitored asteroids, on a possible collision course, don't think about those that we can't monitor, do not wonder about supervolcanos and especially forget about nano-plastic in the air and glyphosate, shush.
I'm going to agree with you on the fact that I think we overestimate when it comes to the climate. People think that the world is going to be gone in the next 10 years, then 10 years after that, then 10 years after that, and so on and so forth.
At one point they'll be right.
But the only way to convince people is to truly show them real evidence and then to be RIGHT at some-point.
I don't know who or what to believe at this point.
October 07, 2019, 08:51:51 AM
About time somebody put global warming to use rather than simply complaining about it!
Drought-Proof 'Cooling Houses' Use Saltwater and Cardboard to Grow Tons of Healthy Produce in the Desert.
Drought-Proof 'Cooling Houses' Use Saltwater and Cardboard to Grow Tons of Healthy Produce in the Desert.
Quote from: https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/cooling-houses-use-saltwater-and-cardboard-to-produce-in-deserts/
Saltwater and dry desert climates may not seem like a good recipe for growing healthy produce, but that is exactly what a group of scientists has managed to do.
Researchers from the UK-based Seawater Greenhouse company have discovered a drought-proof way to farm fruits and vegetables simply by using solar power and saltwater for irrigation and cooling.
The company has launched plantation projects in arid regions such as Australia, Abu Dhabi, Somaliland, Oman, and Tenerife. Despite the harsh climate of these locations, the plantations are able to grow thousands of pounds of produce simply by making "cooling houses" out of thick walls of dampened cardboard.
While glass greenhouses are designed to keep gardens moist and warm, the cardboard structures use "evaporative cooling" to keep the interior of the plantation structures humid and cool.
The design of the corrugated cardboard panels helps to cool down the wind coming from the outside of the structure. At the same time, a small solar-powered pump dispenses seawater at the top of the panels so that it can trickle down through the walls of the cardboard for evaporation.
This "evaporative cooling" technique creates the perfect conditions for farming produce in drought-stricken regions.
Researchers from the UK-based Seawater Greenhouse company have discovered a drought-proof way to farm fruits and vegetables simply by using solar power and saltwater for irrigation and cooling.
The company has launched plantation projects in arid regions such as Australia, Abu Dhabi, Somaliland, Oman, and Tenerife. Despite the harsh climate of these locations, the plantations are able to grow thousands of pounds of produce simply by making "cooling houses" out of thick walls of dampened cardboard.
While glass greenhouses are designed to keep gardens moist and warm, the cardboard structures use "evaporative cooling" to keep the interior of the plantation structures humid and cool.
The design of the corrugated cardboard panels helps to cool down the wind coming from the outside of the structure. At the same time, a small solar-powered pump dispenses seawater at the top of the panels so that it can trickle down through the walls of the cardboard for evaporation.
This "evaporative cooling" technique creates the perfect conditions for farming produce in drought-stricken regions.
October 07, 2019, 01:30:21 AM
Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along.
If this isn't a proof for G.W. being a religion then I don't know what is.Only through some form of religious beliefs smart people can do irrational things.
One may ask why the idea of cannibalism is completely mind-blowing (pun intended) and irrational?
Today the answer is quite simple but it wasn't just a decade ago, luckily now we know that nature developed interesting mechanism, to prevent self-eating species from ever evolving. We might have been lucky that such ideas came up this day and age.
Prion diseases. For example Creutzfeldt-Jakob syndrome (the mad-cow disease), is caused by prions (super durable cells) hidden in the bone powder, made out of dead cows. It was a common practice to feed cattle with such powder, as an effect, we ended up with zombiefied animals, with foam instead of brains. Same effect (extremely premature Alzheimer) was observed among African cannibals in the early '60. We don't eat other people because it's a sin, we don't do it because is simply not healthy!
Are we living in a dream of a drunk madman? Or maybe this woman really wants to drive humanity in to a trash-can of history?
Either way, she appears to be an adherent of NWO.
Jump to: