Pages:
Author

Topic: Global warming explained once and for all. IPCC says: nothing to worry about - page 2. (Read 652 times)

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
Woman at Ocasio-Cortez town hall demands that everyone “eat the babies” – while AOC nods along.

During a recent town hall event in Corona, New York, her home district, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) responded to questions about her infamous Green New Deal, including from one woman who told AOC that we now need to “eat the babies” in order to save the planet from climate change.

Go to the site and watch the video.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
[snip]
-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
O, OK, so it all about the ocean now...
First it was the acid rains - OMG amazon jungle will be poisoned and gone by the year 2000, act now! - Tax 'em
Then was the ozone layer - OMG we all gonna get cancer, atmosphere is to thin! - Tax 'em more
Next it was the warming - OMG we all gonna boil, the atmosphere is to thick! - Tax, Tax, Tax.
And now the oceanic life - OMG we all gona... what this time? Hunker for shrimps?

When will you wake up? It's nothing but a new religion. Technocratic gibberish for the masses to accept new forms of extortions.
I'm not saying it is a bad idea to care about your surroundings. But while you do, don't force ridiculous regulations on people.
Think about this, when was the last time young generations were so, so in favour of governmental actions? When was the last time teenagers where in favour for politicians? It's a precedence due to horribly effective mind control. Don't think about 27K monitored asteroids, on a possible collision course, don't think about those that we can't monitor...
You mean the other million big rocks?
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 31
minds.com/Wilikon
.... in reverse: from fully dumb to half dumb, to... etc, etc..
 Smiley

Merited!

It has been said, that certain ideas and concepts were radioactive...


That's why we are here. What an amazing radioactive paradigm shift Bitcoin is.

hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 756
Bobby Fischer was right
[snip]
-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
O, OK, so it all about the ocean now...
First it was the acid rains - OMG amazon jungle will be poisoned and gone by the year 2000, act now! - Tax 'em
Then was the ozone layer - OMG we all gonna get cancer, atmosphere is to thin! - Tax 'em more
Next it was the warming - OMG we all gonna boil, the atmosphere is to thick! - Tax, Tax, Tax.
And now the oceanic life - OMG we all gona... what this time? Hunker for shrimps?

When will you wake up? It's nothing but a new religion. Technocratic gibberish for the masses to accept new forms of extortions.
I'm not saying it is a bad idea to care about your surroundings. But while you do, don't force ridiculous regulations on people.
Think about this, when was the last time young generations were so, so in favour of governmental actions? When was the last time teenagers where in favour for politicians? It's a precedence due to horribly effective mind control. Don't think about 27K monitored asteroids, on a possible collision course, don't think about those that we can't monitor, do not wonder about supervolcanos and especially forget about nano-plastic in the air and glyphosate, shush.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
^^^ It's kinda like melting glaciers. They melt on one end while they are being renewed on the other end.

If the glaciers won't melt any faster, I think I'll move to Belize.

Cool
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 175
@cryptocommies
Simple Chemistry.  If you have a glass of ice, the temperature of the ice rises until it reaches its melting point.  At that point, extra heat goes into the phase change but does not raise the temperature until the phase change is complete.  Water is really good at absorbing heat.  

Another noteworthy fact is that water expands when it is heated.  The rises in sea level and changes in ocean salinity come with devastating consequences.

In addition to that, the ocean absorbs CO2 and CO2 that is absorbed into the ocean no longer contributes to heating the atmosphere.  Think about it like a sodastream.  If you increase the pressure of the gas, more of it goes into the water.  Ocean acidification will have devastating effects on marine ecosystems.  


Nowhere in the report does it say "nothing to worry about".  The Earth has ways to compensate for heating.  Those compensations are some of the largest effects of warming the planet.  It was never the earth becoming too warm that we were worried about.  It was always the effects of warming the world by just a few degrees that we were worried about.

-Climate change
-Rising sea levels
-Ocean acidification
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
.... in reverse: from fully dumb to half dumb, to... etc, etc..
 Smiley

Merited!

It has been said, that certain ideas and concepts were radioactive...
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 31
minds.com/Wilikon
poptok1 along with the scientist counter Greta, don't panic!
Quote
Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence)
...


I am sorry  I do not have the time to look up your links today.

But the likely answer is the simple fact that the effect of increased Co2 declines exponentially with each additional unit quantity. So the first doubling over pre industrial levels had the largest effect, the second maybe half of that, the third one quarter, and so forth. Basic radiative physics.


Basic radiative physics.

Every time I feel my mind is going to dumb level I come here and learn something new. Hopefully being exposed to this knowledge works the same but in reverse: from fully dumb to half dumb, to... etc, etc..
 Smiley

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
poptok1 along with the scientist counter Greta, don't panic!
Quote
Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence)
...


I am sorry  I do not have the time to look up your links today.

But the likely answer is the simple fact that the effect of increased Co2 declines exponentially with each additional unit quantity. So the first doubling over pre industrial levels had the largest effect, the second maybe half of that, the third one quarter, and so forth. Basic radiative physics.

To put this in everyday language, suppose you are in an area where three smoke bombs are set off. Suddenly it's hard to see anything. Ten minutes later another three are set of and ten minutes after that, another three.

It's clear that the first ones have the most effect, once it's hard to see anything it can't get that much harder to see.

hero member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 756
Bobby Fischer was right
poptok1 along with the scientist counter Greta, don't panic!
Quote
Human activities are estimated to have caused approximately 1.0°C of global warming above pre-industrial levels, with a likely range of 0.8°C to 1.2°C. Global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052 if it continues to increase at the current rate. (high confidence)
300 years or us burning stuff, made Erth to worm up a bit - big shocker  Roll Eyes
If we continue our way of living, Erth will get warmer +0.3°C, and that's it, look at the official chart below.
Turn off the electricity, stop the production, go full caveman and cool the planet down about 0.3°, or do nothing and enjoy your v8's?
Quote
Warming from anthropogenic emissions from the pre-industrial period to the present will persist for centuries to millennia and will continue to cause further long-term changes in the climate system, such as sea level rise, with associated impacts (high confidence), but these emissions alone are unlikely to cause global warming of 1.5°C (medium confidence).
Are they suggesting that the peak of warming has already have happen? I looks to me this way. There is a natural resistance, the wall to the warming. We can't warm the planet beyond a certain point, even if we wanted to. Sure, there are some consequences, AC is a must have basically and few rare bugs will be lost. I like my PC better anyway.   

Quotations taken from the official IPCC report.
Funny thing is that this is the exact report that this fear mongering girl is citing.
Read it for yourself as she asks... now to think of it, maybe this is her plan all along, to stop this madness by being mad?
Smiley Huh Cool

Pages:
Jump to: