Solo mining Beam using gminer and there is a bug which shows up difficulty in the miner as ~450Millions
should be around 200Millions.
can be changed manually or can Evgeniy fix the bug please?
thanks.
Topic: GMiner v3.24 Ergo+KASPA+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex - page 46. (Read 307024 times)
sparkpool.com
leafpool.com
leafpool.com
thank you, problem solved!
DNS was wrong, my internet provider have fcked this domains to some strange IPs (like a blocked)
and google DNS server was second after provider's one, so i just delete it and leave only Google's (8.8.8.
now works fine!
can somebody help me,
i mining CUCKATOO31 on 1.96 gminer version
and it starting fine, all working
but after 1 minute is stops with error:
"All devfee mining pools are unavailable"
i dont have any firewall blocks, and using Google DNS servers (8.8.8.
can comebody help me, what can be wrong
or can developer @Zminer777 tell me at least one devfee pool, so i will can test that it is really blocked, and try to understand where it is blocking
tnx in advance, wait for your answers
sparkpool.comi mining CUCKATOO31 on 1.96 gminer version
and it starting fine, all working
but after 1 minute is stops with error:
"All devfee mining pools are unavailable"
i dont have any firewall blocks, and using Google DNS servers (8.8.8.
can comebody help me, what can be wrong
or can developer @Zminer777 tell me at least one devfee pool, so i will can test that it is really blocked, and try to understand where it is blocking
tnx in advance, wait for your answers
leafpool.com
can somebody help me,
i mining CUCKATOO31 on 1.96 gminer version
and it starting fine, all working
but after 1 minute is stops with error:
"All devfee mining pools are unavailable"
i dont have any firewall blocks, and using Google DNS servers (8.8.8.
can comebody help me, what can be wrong
or can developer @Zminer777 tell me at least one devfee pool, so i will can test that it is really blocked, and try to understand where it is blocking
tnx in advance, wait for your answers
i mining CUCKATOO31 on 1.96 gminer version
and it starting fine, all working
but after 1 minute is stops with error:
"All devfee mining pools are unavailable"
i dont have any firewall blocks, and using Google DNS servers (8.8.8.
can comebody help me, what can be wrong
or can developer @Zminer777 tell me at least one devfee pool, so i will can test that it is really blocked, and try to understand where it is blocking
tnx in advance, wait for your answers
NBminer is not bminer.
Bminer did not started!I used NBminer, sorry my bad.
Try NBminer. I have 0,86 on GTX1070 on Win 7 with PL65%.
Hello! Thank you!But with bminer I have only 0,75. Very bad...
DaggerHashimoto looks better (WTM) on my system. I am sad.
Grin 31 / Simplemining:
0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
86.02.39.00.67
Bus id: 01:00.0
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
GPU Bios: 86.02.39.00.67
1645 / 5400
1.58 H/s
147 W
65°C / 35%
1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
86.02.39.00.B9
1771 / 5400
1.6 H/s
162 W
43°C / 35%
2: Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB
86.04.1E.00.A2
1873 / 4201
0.92 H/s
94 W
48°C / 34%
3: Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB
86.04.50.00.1C
1987 / 4201
0.92 H/s
94 W
48°C / 35%
some 1080s
0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1708 / 4811
0.97 H/s
129 W
40°C / 0%
1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1695 / 4811
0.96 H/s
100 W
46°C / 0%
2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1733 / 4811
0.97 H/s
132 W
43°C / 0%
3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1695 / 4811
0.97 H/s
132 W
42°C / 0%
4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
2062 / 4811
0.97 H/s
124 W
43°C / 0%
and some of my 2080s:
0: Msi RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.23.00.6D
Bus id: 03:00.0
Msi RTX 2080 8GB
GPU Bios: 90.04.23.00.6D
1575 / 7000
1.71 H/s
132 W
31°C / 0%
1: Asus RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.0D.00.25
1485 / 7000
1.7 H/s
125 W
33°C / 0%
2: Gainward RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.0B.00.C7
1575 / 7000
1.73 H/s
139 W
32°C / 0%
Has anybody got some data for the 2080ti?
0: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
86.02.39.00.67
Bus id: 01:00.0
Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
GPU Bios: 86.02.39.00.67
1645 / 5400
1.58 H/s
147 W
65°C / 35%
1: Zotac GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
86.02.39.00.B9
1771 / 5400
1.6 H/s
162 W
43°C / 35%
2: Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB
86.04.1E.00.A2
1873 / 4201
0.92 H/s
94 W
48°C / 34%
3: Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB
86.04.50.00.1C
1987 / 4201
0.92 H/s
94 W
48°C / 35%
some 1080s
0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1708 / 4811
0.97 H/s
129 W
40°C / 0%
1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1695 / 4811
0.96 H/s
100 W
46°C / 0%
2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1733 / 4811
0.97 H/s
132 W
43°C / 0%
3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
1695 / 4811
0.97 H/s
132 W
42°C / 0%
4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 8GB
86.04.17.40.38
2062 / 4811
0.97 H/s
124 W
43°C / 0%
and some of my 2080s:
0: Msi RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.23.00.6D
Bus id: 03:00.0
Msi RTX 2080 8GB
GPU Bios: 90.04.23.00.6D
1575 / 7000
1.71 H/s
132 W
31°C / 0%
1: Asus RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.0D.00.25
1485 / 7000
1.7 H/s
125 W
33°C / 0%
2: Gainward RTX 2080 8GB
90.04.0B.00.C7
1575 / 7000
1.73 H/s
139 W
32°C / 0%
Has anybody got some data for the 2080ti?
Try NBminer. I have 0,86 on GTX1070 on Win 7 with PL65%.
Hello! Thank you!But with bminer I have only 0,75. Very bad...
DaggerHashimoto looks better (WTM) on my system. I am sad.
try more power for cards
HiAnother rig with 6 GPU is ok!
Power rate identically on the both rigs! But only on 13 GPU rig problem is present!
On the rig with windows 7 and 13x GTX 1070 hashrate jumps in grin31 algo! Please fix this problem!
https://ibb.co/cw2Z6KC
https://ibb.co/KqDcpXK
https://ibb.co/mFhvbvN
try more power for cards
HiAnother rig with 6 GPU is ok!
Power rate identically on the both rigs! But only on 13 GPU rig problem is present!
On the rig with windows 7 and 13x GTX 1070 hashrate jumps in grin31 algo! Please fix this problem!
https://ibb.co/cw2Z6KC
https://ibb.co/KqDcpXK
https://ibb.co/mFhvbvN
Hello! I need help!
Very low shares in my 13 x GTX1070 Mining RIG!!!
https://ibb.co/LZHZMtX
https://ibb.co/0n4Nshy
try more power for cards Very low shares in my 13 x GTX1070 Mining RIG!!!
https://ibb.co/LZHZMtX
https://ibb.co/0n4Nshy
Hi I have 107ti cortex algo says "out of memory" ? is it nomal? 1080 with 8gb work on hiveos, but 1070ti with 8gb can't?
You need to allow more virtual memory
So it's not possible under windows 10 then? If there is a way pls enlighten me
Hi I have 107ti cortex algo says "out of memory" ? is it nomal? 1080 with 8gb work on hiveos, but 1070ti with 8gb can't?
You need to allow more virtual memory
So it's not possible under windows 10 then? If there is a way pls enlighten me
Hello! I need help!
Very low shares in my 13 x GTX1070 Mining RIG!!!
https://ibb.co/LZHZMtX
https://ibb.co/0n4Nshy
Very low shares in my 13 x GTX1070 Mining RIG!!!
https://ibb.co/LZHZMtX
https://ibb.co/0n4Nshy
Hi I have 107ti cortex algo says "out of memory" ? is it nomal? 1080 with 8gb work on hiveos, but 1070ti with 8gb can't?
You need to allow more virtual memory
Do improvement for 1070ti (in c31 algo please) !
Hi I have 107ti cortex algo says "out of memory" ? is it nomal? 1080 with 8gb work on hiveos, but 1070ti with 8gb can't?
You need to allow more virtual memory
Hi I have 107ti cortex algo says "out of memory" ? is it nomal? 1080 with 8gb work on hiveos, but 1070ti with 8gb can't?
GMiner v1.96 available for download
v1.96
+ improved cuckaroom29 performance(up to +5-6% dependent on GPU)
+ display devfee on startup
v1.96
+ improved cuckaroom29 performance(up to +5-6% dependent on GPU)
+ display devfee on startup
Hello, my CuckarooM speeds...
GTX 1070Ti 8GB (6GB Solver) - increase from 3.400 to 3.660 G/s (about +7,5pct)
GTX 1660Ti 6GB (5GB Solver) - increase from 2.800 to 3.107 G/s (about +11pct)
RTX 2070 8GB (6GB Solver) - increase from 4.600 to 5.250 G/s (from +11 to +14pct, i have 30 different types)
RTX 2070S 8GB (6GB solver) - increase from 5.075 to 5.625 G/s (about +11pct)
This is a good work man, thank you
ETC mining on Pascal cards seems to be broken. Got only a half hashrate (17-20 MH/s) on 1070ti when mining ETC (ETH is ok).
Tested on Nicehash and Ethermine ETC pools.
Tested on Nicehash and Ethermine ETC pools.
I would not say broken, but ETC is in a later dag epoch which may hurt your card more then it should (but its normal etc is slower then eth due to this). I assume at least the general implementation for etc and eth has same quality.
The difference is not large enough to explain such a speed difference
Jump to: