GMiner v1.83 available for download
v1.83
+ improved Eaglesong performance on Nvidia GPUs
Telegram group: https://t.me/gminer_equihash
Telegram beta test group: https://t.me/gminer_beta
Download links:
GitHub: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerRelease/releases/tag/1.83
Topic: GMiner v3.24 Ergo+KASPA+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex - page 52. (Read 307024 times)
Could someone tell me what BFC hashrate on RX 5700 and 5700 XT?
hi.
i am using hiveos. i am mining with 4x1660ti 2x1660 and 2x1070. when i try to run it, it tells me that some of the 1660 is out of memory. why is that?
i am using hiveos. i am mining with 4x1660ti 2x1660 and 2x1070. when i try to run it, it tells me that some of the 1660 is out of memory. why is that?
Hi dev!
Mine cortex.
my hash ~0.13h/s but pool show hash 24 hour only 0.027hs.
Can you tell me what problem?
Mine cortex.
my hash ~0.13h/s but pool show hash 24 hour only 0.027hs.
Can you tell me what problem?
Couldn't get Gminer to work with Equihash 210,9 on HIVEOS. It kept giving an error saying that algorithm is not specified, when it clearly was. Here's a screenshot:
https://i.imgur.com/i9Zxnll.png
https://i.imgur.com/i9Zxnll.png
GMiner v1.82 available for download
v1.82
+ significant performance improvements for Cuckoo29 algorithm(AE, BFC) on Nvidia GPUs (+4-10%, for 5GB+ cards)
Performance on stock GPU settings:
Cuckoo29:
Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~3.53 G/s
Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~4.75 G/s
Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~5.22 G/s
Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~5.65 G/s
MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~5.75 G/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~8.66 G/s
Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~6.53 G/s
MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~8.12 G/s
MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~9.5 G/s
BFC:
Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~84.04 H/s
Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~133.09 H/s
Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~124.28 H/s
Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~134.52 H/s
MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~136.90 H/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~206.19 H/s
Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~155.47 H/s
MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~193.33 H/s
MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~226.19 H/s
Telegram group: https://t.me/gminer_equihash
Telegram beta test group: https://t.me/gminer_beta
Download links:
GitHub: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerRelease/releases/tag/1.82
v1.82
+ significant performance improvements for Cuckoo29 algorithm(AE, BFC) on Nvidia GPUs (+4-10%, for 5GB+ cards)
Performance on stock GPU settings:
Cuckoo29:
Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~3.53 G/s
Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~4.75 G/s
Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~5.22 G/s
Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~5.65 G/s
MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~5.75 G/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~8.66 G/s
Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~6.53 G/s
MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~8.12 G/s
MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~9.5 G/s
BFC:
Palit GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ~84.04 H/s
Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC 6GB ~133.09 H/s
Palit GTX 1070 Dual 8GB ~124.28 H/s
Palit GTX 1070 Ti JetStream 8GB ~134.52 H/s
MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK EK X 8GB ~136.90 H/s
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti AORUS Waterforce WB Xtreme Edition 11GB ~206.19 H/s
Palit RTX 2060 Dual 6GB ~155.47 H/s
MSI RTX 2070 Armor 8GB ~193.33 H/s
MSI RTX 2080 DUKE 8GB ~226.19 H/s
Telegram group: https://t.me/gminer_equihash
Telegram beta test group: https://t.me/gminer_beta
Download links:
GitHub: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerRelease/releases/tag/1.82
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Perhaps your problem arises due to ping, it is too big))) But seriously, there is a problem with this algorithm. I hope the developers fix it.Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Already explained.
1H/s = 42G/s
Does anyone know why my Cortex hashrate differs so much? Tried out a few diff pools.
Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Perhaps your problem arises due to ping, it is too big))) But seriously, there is a problem with this algorithm. I hope the developers fix it. Gminer reports 6.5G/s but pool reports 0.125H/s. Does G stand for something I've never noticed before?
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
may be because you have used Windows 10?P.S. Windows 10 reserves 1.5GB+ of video memory
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
may be because you have used Windows 10?P.S. Windows 10 reserves 1.5GB+ of video memory
Why 1080ti only "selected 8G solver" also titan selected 11G
Algorithm: Cortex
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less.Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Ethash+EagleSong: After 25-30 hours of normal work - no shares from EagleSong. 2 Times i have this problem with 1.81.
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs.Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42
As a miner, should I care about graphs per second? Obviously I care a lot about Pool accepted h/sec so I care about miner reported h/sec. But do I need to care about graphs/sec?
Algorithm: Cortex
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 10 eats GPU memory a lot, win 8.1 - less. Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Algorithm: Cortex
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Win 7 or Win 10, I have no luck with 8gb cards on Win 10 but they all work on Win7.
could you please update your distributed readme to include all available options
Algorithm: Cortex
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Stratum server:
host: mining.ctxcpool.com:8008
user: 0x89c27a*****************
password: x
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
API: off
Log to file: miner.log
Selected devices: GPU0
Intensity: 100
Temperature limits: 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
19:22:06 Failed to initialize miner on GPU0: MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB: out of memory
19:22:06 No devices for mining
GTX 1080 8Gb normal work!
Hi
I Use some P106-090 6Gb/3Gb
Gminer performs poorly on these video cards.
Cards may not respond for more than a minute and then shows that everything works. On almost all algorithms.
http://prntscr.com/q2qrun
I Use some P106-090 6Gb/3Gb
Gminer performs poorly on these video cards.
Cards may not respond for more than a minute and then shows that everything works. On almost all algorithms.
http://prntscr.com/q2qrun
I think it's just his math is bad. I'm doing about 8.5g/s on gminer, I think it's just reporting hashes a minute not second. If you divide 8.5 by 60 you get .141 and my accepted speed is hovering around 0.145h/sec on the pool.
Miner display graph per second, pool display hashes per second. To compute one hash miner should find solution, to find solution miner need compute on average 42 graphs.Thus H/s ~ G/s / 42
Consider doing that on the client side. I'm sure you'll have less users confused.
Jump to: