I really couldn't care less how Mycelium has been a MAJOR force in bringing Bitcoin to the noobs
See this is the problem. "Noobs" preferring user interface and "ease-of-use" in place of robust, well designed software and then crying when the software fails them because of faulty implementation.
See this is the problem. "Noobs" preferring user interface and "ease-of-use" in place of robust, well designed software and then crying when the software fails them because of faulty implementation.
I've never used it, but Frap.doc is apparently a devoted fan of Mycelium and utterly distraught over its recent glitch.
Expecting 100% uptime from such a service and freaking out and declaring Bitcoin dead over a little outage is a professional noob move only he has mastered.
Speaking of professional noob maneuvers:
#REKT, please call your office. Dr. LeBron Bitcoin is on line 2...something about a "vast GavinCoiner majority?"
when Mycelium, just a few days ago, invoked a fee bidding mechanism in their wallet, you were the first shill to jump up and down and scream "see fee mkt!" now that they blow up, you throw them under the bus. your sort of behavior is simply indicative of someone shilling for Blockstream while throwing shit all over the wall hoping something sticks.
You do realise everything you describe here applies to you.
You are the exact representation of someone throwing shit at the wall hoping any causality or correlation you can pull out your ass and defend your position will stick. It is the same story over and over again, you did it with sidechains and now you are at it again regarding the blocksize.
Was Mycelium correct in their intention to invoke a fee bidding mechanism? Yes
Are they running their wallet behind an admitted faulty node implementation? Yes
nice try noob.
you're another example of a shit thrower. never provide any technical discussion or insight.
in case you'd like to go back and review all my technical posts, including those in direct discussion with nullc, like with the UTXO and CNB stuff. he actually tried to obfuscate and i've documented where he contradicts himself about UTXO being in RAM. Peter R also proved with statistical significance my hunch that the defensive 0 tx blocks were indeed coming within a minute of full blocks. it also appears i was right about those defensive blocks coming in the presence of bloated mempools. i was in fact documenting these 0 tx blocks weeks before the spam attack as something strange happening. i also think i'm right that the spammers are attacking as we've gotten close to filling blocks with real demand so as to disrupt new and existing users. the attacks will continue to try and hinder that growth. i've filled these pages with real technical and interpretive discussion about what's actually going on yet what do we get from idiots like you? nothing. nothing insightful except ad hominem attacks.
brg444, you're useless. admit it. just like during the SC debate, you're contributing nothing. nothing at all except trolling.
Looking at iCEBLOW and frappe.doc here. 
