Author

Topic: Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP. - page 186. (Read 2032248 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 06:18:25 PM
we're not even under attack yet blocks continue to fill up:
Unbelievable!  It's almost as if subsidizing spam/noise transactions creates more of them.   Huh
 Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!  |  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!

Paging Justusranvier to explain in free-market principles pretzels how iCEBREAKER is muddled in his thinking.

i am full of shit

iCEBlow, do you ever put forth any logical technical arguments or is it always pure bluster and FUD?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 25, 2015, 06:12:58 PM
we're not even under attack yet blocks continue to fill up:
Unbelievable!  It's almost as if subsidizing spam/noise transactions creates more of them.   Huh
  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!  |  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!

Paging Justusranvier to explain in free-market principles pretzels how iCEBREAKER is muddled in his thinking.

Heh, the Gavinistas are having a very bad day week.   Cool

First, Frap.doc was put upon to explain with some semblance of logical consistency how he reaches the same pro-bloat conclusion as [email protected], despite operating on quite opposite assumptions w/r/t the financial crisis being over (now and in the med. term future).

Then came yet another face-r3kking, sig-worthy domination tweet from Jon Matonis (as if the previous from Szatoshi Backamoto weren't enough) about the utter futility of shoehorning Bitcon's square settlement peg into VisaPayPal's round payment hole:



And finally(?) Dear Leader Himself debunks [email protected] and Frap.doc's attempts to ram through ill-considered hard forks using fear and mass hysteria:


legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 06:00:40 PM
looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)

I figured his ego would cause him to misstep as expected.

Is he not providing (so far circumstantial) evidence that is well connected with those who may have the power to produce mining cartels.

A few more missteps and I shall have him cornered...

BOO!!!

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 05:59:13 PM

we're not even under attack yet blocks continue to fill up:

Unbelievable!  It's almost as if subsidizing spam/noise transactions creates more of them.   Huh
...

  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!  |  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!

Paging Justusranvier to explain in free-market principles pretzels how iCEBREAKER is muddled in his thinking.



you supposed engineers are stupid, aren't you?

i'll take a stab at this:  for 6 yrs we've had a small enough tx set that barely filled 1MB blocks.  now that we're starting to get closer to filling them up, spammers find it more cost effective to spam (don't have to create as many fee paying spam to fill the blocks and cause problems).  thus, their attacks start to increase in frequency. that's a problem because of the 1MB limit.

and to quote one of our trusted in thread "engineers", solex:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
June 25, 2015, 05:54:33 PM
looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)

I figured his ego would cause him to misstep as expected.

Is he not providing (so far circumstantial) evidence that is well connected with those who may have the power to produce mining cartels.

A few more missteps and I shall have him cornered...
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
June 25, 2015, 05:29:29 PM

we're not even under attack yet blocks continue to fill up:

Unbelievable!  It's almost as if subsidizing spam/noise transactions creates more of them.   Huh
...

  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!  |  Whoop - Whoop - Whoop  |  emergency!

Paging Justusranvier to explain in free-market principles pretzels how iCEBREAKER is muddled in his thinking.

member
Activity: 63
Merit: 11
June 25, 2015, 05:20:35 PM
Unbelievable!  It's almost as if subsidizing spam/noise transactions creates more of them.   Huh

Indeed, building wider motorways doesn't necessarily solve traffic congestion. A bunch of other things sometimes do (raising gasoline/car taxes/prices, regulation, unemployment, crime, alternative transport, virtual working, better city layout, emigration...).
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
June 25, 2015, 05:09:40 PM

Maybe because cypherdoc made a fortune as early adopter and now is trying to privatize bitcoin. He is one of them who can run 8 GB block-size node.

Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.



c'mon man, gimme credit.

i'm the guy genius who successfully solo mined on Avalon's.  which, btw, was supposed to be HARD.  pfft!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211

looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)

yes.

like i said, all that btwn patients:

"excuse me, Mrs. Smith...time for me to do Sybil.  uh, i don't mean 'do', i mean see.  or do i mean, make her see O_o?"

Excuse me  "ASIC inventor"(somebody who can turn on ASIC) and "Bitcoin core developer"(somebody who is able to change constant from 1MB to 20MB). :-) You are funny,

edit:
I forgot. You are doing all this FOR NON PROFIT.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 05:00:35 PM

Maybe because cypherdoc made a fortune as early adopter and now is trying to privatize bitcoin. He is one of them who can run 8 GB block-size node.

Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.



c'mon man, gimme credit.

i'm the guy genius who successfully solo mined on Avalon's.  which, btw, was supposed to be HARD.  pfft!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211

looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)

yes.

like i said, all that btwn patients:

"excuse me, Mrs. Smith...time for me to do Sybil.  uh, i don't mean 'do', i mean see.  or do i mean, make her see O_o?"
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
June 25, 2015, 04:58:27 PM

Maybe because cypherdoc made a fortune as early adopter and now is trying to privatize bitcoin. He is one of them who can run 8 GB block-size node.

Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.



c'mon man, gimme credit.

i'm the guy genius who successfully solo mined on Avalon's.  which, btw, was supposed to be HARD.  pfft!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211

looks like, you developed first asic. (during pauses when you was not coding bitcoin core)
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 04:47:22 PM

Maybe because cypherdoc made a fortune as early adopter and now is trying to privatize bitcoin. He is one of them who can run 8 GB block-size node.

Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.



c'mon man, gimme credit.

i'm the guy genius who successfully solo mined on Avalon's.  which, btw, was supposed to be HARD.  pfft!

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3b0ycp/the_current_system_where_every_user_is_a_network/cshz211
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
June 25, 2015, 04:43:38 PM

Maybe because cypherdoc made a fortune as early adopter and now is trying to privatize bitcoin. He is one of them who can run 8 GB block-size node.

Ya, with a GUI installer and a 'tute'.

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
June 25, 2015, 04:43:11 PM

yes, it was me who mined that 1 tx block.  and yes, i stand ready to pump out a series of endless 8MB spam blocks from all the different pool IP addresses while at the same time mounting a massive Sybil attack on yours and Odalv's private wallets.  b/c i want to privatize the network:

BOO!!!


oh, and this is all btwn patients.

"excuse me, Mrs. Jones..."

I'm convinced. Nobody... and I mean NOBODY here is sane.  Grin

hey, c'mon, be a sport.

sometimes when you're surrounded by the insane (tvbcof, TPTB, icBLow), you just gotta go with it!  don't be sad; be HAPPY! Cheesy

No offence, but I'm the driver. Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 04:41:34 PM

yes, it was me who mined that 1 tx block.  and yes, i stand ready to pump out a series of endless 8MB spam blocks from all the different pool IP addresses while at the same time mounting a massive Sybil attack on yours and Odalv's private wallets.  b/c i want to privatize the network:

BOO!!!


oh, and this is all btwn patients.

"excuse me, Mrs. Jones..."

I'm convinced. Nobody... and I mean NOBODY here is sane.  Grin

hey, c'mon, be a sport.

sometimes when you're surrounded by the insane (tvbcof, TPTB, icBLow), you just gotta go with it!  don't be sad; be HAPPY! Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 04:33:44 PM
for those of you that actually understand this stuff, unlike TPTB, take a look at how some miner appears to be defending himself from a series of maxed out blocks with a 1 tx mined block:

https://i.imgur.com/r45L37T.png

For those who've not been around a while, note that zero-length blocks are nothing new.  They occur for a variety of reasons.  One of them is that mining viruses can mine without bothering to listen and process transactions on the network.  The more transactions there are, the more onerous actually supporting the network becomes.  As long as fees are a trivial part of a reward and miners are kept in business almost exclusively by Bitcoin's coded in inflation (the 'coinbase') we can expect to see such things.  Keeping fees trivial is of utmost importance to a minority of Bitcoin developers and a larger segment of non-developers.  It also becomes technically more challenging to actually verify transactions because of increased bloat so we might see more miners not bothering and blocks pumped out with invalid transactions (which, hopefully, will die on shorter chains as long as there are at least a few people who are validating properly.)



or, much more likely, they can just be doing a Wang Chun.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
June 25, 2015, 04:33:13 PM

yes, it was me who mined that 1 tx block.  and yes, i stand ready to pump out a series of endless 8MB spam blocks from all the different pool IP addresses while at the same time mounting a massive Sybil attack on yours and Odalv's private wallets.  b/c i want to privatize the network:

BOO!!!


oh, and this is all btwn patients.

"excuse me, Mrs. Jones..."

I'm convinced. Nobody... and I mean NOBODY here is sane.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 04:30:56 PM

yes, it was me who mined that 1 tx block.  and yes, i stand ready to pump out a series of endless 8MB spam blocks from all the different pool IP addresses while at the same time mounting a massive Sybil attack on yours and Odalv's private wallets.  b/c i want to privatize the network:

BOO!!!


oh, and this is all btwn patients.

"excuse me, Mrs. Jones..."
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
June 25, 2015, 04:30:07 PM
for those of you that actually understand this stuff, unlike TPTB, take a look at how some miner appears to be defending himself from a series of maxed out blocks with a 1 tx mined block:

https://i.imgur.com/r45L37T.png

For those who've not been around a while, note that zero-length blocks are nothing new.  They occur for a variety of reasons.  One of them is that mining viruses can mine without bothering to listen and process transactions on the network.  The more transactions there are, the more onerous actually supporting the network becomes.  As long as fees are a trivial part of a reward and miners are kept in business almost exclusively by Bitcoin's coded in inflation (the 'coinbase') we can expect to see such things.  Keeping fees trivial is of utmost importance to a minority of Bitcoin developers and a larger segment of non-developers.  It also becomes technically more challenging to actually verify transactions because of increased bloat so we might see more miners not bothering and blocks pumped out with invalid transactions (which, hopefully, will die on shorter chains as long as there are at least a few people who are validating properly.)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
June 25, 2015, 04:25:26 PM
for those of you that actually understand this stuff, unlike TPTB, take a look at how some miner appears to be defending himself from a series of maxed out blocks with a 1 tx mined block:

You ignored the request for the missing data.

Also I don't agree with your presumption of the meaning of any particular structure, for numerous reasons including but not limited to aliasing error.

But even if I did subscribe to your pulled-out-my-ass theory of structure motivation, how do I prove it wasn't you who inserted that 1 tx block?

(careful, I am preparing to prove that you are colluding with a mining oligarchy)

yes, it was me who mined that 1 tx block.  and yes, i stand ready to pump out a series of endless 8MB spam blocks from all the different pool IP addresses while at the same time mounting a massive Sybil attack on yours and Odalv's private wallets.  b/c i want to privatize the network:

BOO!!!

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
June 25, 2015, 04:19:34 PM
for those of you that actually understand this stuff, unlike TPTB, take a look at how some miner appears to be defending himself from a series of maxed out blocks with a 1 tx mined block:

You ignored the request for the missing data.

Also I don't agree with your presumption of the meaning of any particular structure, for numerous reasons including but not limited to aliasing error.

But even if I did subscribe to your pulled-out-my-ass theory of structure motivation, how do I prove it wasn't you who inserted that 1 tx block?

(careful, I am preparing to prove that you are colluding with a mining oligarchy to fool the readers, if you misstep I will catch you)

You should have left the thread locked yesterday chickenshit.  Kiss
Jump to: