To me, this is my biggest disappointment in crypto. Not really because of the money I invested in Golem, but because the untapped realization of the potential. I see all the processing power dedicated to mining bitcoin, and although I understand it keeps the chain secure I also believe that power and electricity could be used for something more constructive.
Topic: Golem vs SONM vs iexec (Read 1809 times)
The problem is that you can not make sure that there is relevant progress. It may be that there is a lot of progress in the background and the developer team do just not communicate it and on one day they say, we have a new super extended beta version and everything is fine for investors. There is indeed a lack of communication. But I am still very hopeful in terms of the projects. There is not really a competitor at the moment what makes Golem unique and still interesting for investors. I will hold and follow the news.
To me, this is my biggest disappointment in crypto. Not really because of the money I invested in Golem, but because the untapped realization of the potential. I see all the processing power dedicated to mining bitcoin, and although I understand it keeps the chain secure I also believe that power and electricity could be used for something more constructive.
Regarding Golem, I also considered to invest in the project because the use case is great and needed in business, science and industry.
Then I found in my researches that the coin has been some time in alpha status and there has since been little progress (at least this was my impression). I then decided not to invest in the project and continuing to observe it further.
Then I found in my researches that the coin has been some time in alpha status and there has since been little progress (at least this was my impression). I then decided not to invest in the project and continuing to observe it further.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
Abandoned = wrong. This is pure ignorance and misinformation. But maybe this is the difference also with XEL supporters?
Not cheap anymore? = Cheapness means good coin? What are we discussing here? How cheap a coin is or how good a coin is? I may have been misinformed.
Developed by part timers and volunteers = Oh no, we better abandon Bitcoin because it has a lot of part timers and volunteers.
From what i've read the original developer is no longer involved and the funds are gone? is this incorrect? Maybe it's unfair to say abandoned as i think it had something to do with illness(?) so apologies for that then
re: cheapness, i assume you're being willfully obtuse. We are discussing which coin would be the best investment, so it matters which has the most upside potential.
afaik bitcoin is working, whereas none of these are. in my view the coins that have funding and are being developed full time is likelier to deliver than the part timers without funding
XEL is still under active development so far: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-xel-xel-the-decentralized-supercomputer-1957064
That ICO received around 600BTC a year ago and the "volunteers" are performing better than some other multi-million dollar projects.
okay i'll take your word for it, but best investment in my opinion is sonm. good luck to us both tho, there should be room for all of these to grow until they launch
To invest SONM is currently very nice as it's below the ICO price so far. But I guess it's because peoples fear that the product will not be delivered.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
Abandoned = wrong. This is pure ignorance and misinformation. But maybe this is the difference also with XEL supporters?
Not cheap anymore? = Cheapness means good coin? What are we discussing here? How cheap a coin is or how good a coin is? I may have been misinformed.
Developed by part timers and volunteers = Oh no, we better abandon Bitcoin because it has a lot of part timers and volunteers.
From what i've read the original developer is no longer involved and the funds are gone? is this incorrect? Maybe it's unfair to say abandoned as i think it had something to do with illness(?) so apologies for that then
re: cheapness, i assume you're being willfully obtuse. We are discussing which coin would be the best investment, so it matters which has the most upside potential.
afaik bitcoin is working, whereas none of these are. in my view the coins that have funding and are being developed full time is likelier to deliver than the part timers without funding
XEL is still under active development so far: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-xel-xel-the-decentralized-supercomputer-1957064
That ICO received around 600BTC a year ago and the "volunteers" are performing better than some other multi-million dollar projects.
okay i'll take your word for it, but best investment in my opinion is sonm. good luck to us both tho, there should be room for all of these to grow until they launch
prefer GOLEM over SONM because SONM does not do the latest moves and updates about its coin so SONM coin is glued. SONIM prices are so far away from the price of ICO, maybe investors are losing a lot.
Sonm project team has caused its price to fall 1/3 of the ico price with their own hands. I know they had serious problems in bounty distribution and ico but you can be sure that sonm will make x10 very soon. This project is not different from bancor, 0x, eos, tenx etc in terms of market cap potential.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
Abandoned = wrong. This is pure ignorance and misinformation. But maybe this is the difference also with XEL supporters?
Not cheap anymore? = Cheapness means good coin? What are we discussing here? How cheap a coin is or how good a coin is? I may have been misinformed.
Developed by part timers and volunteers = Oh no, we better abandon Bitcoin because it has a lot of part timers and volunteers.
From what i've read the original developer is no longer involved and the funds are gone? is this incorrect? Maybe it's unfair to say abandoned as i think it had something to do with illness(?) so apologies for that then
re: cheapness, i assume you're being willfully obtuse. We are discussing which coin would be the best investment, so it matters which has the most upside potential.
afaik bitcoin is working, whereas none of these are. in my view the coins that have funding and are being developed full time is likelier to deliver than the part timers without funding
XEL is still under active development so far: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-xel-xel-the-decentralized-supercomputer-1957064
That ICO received around 600BTC a year ago and the "volunteers" are performing better than some other multi-million dollar projects.
I am disappointed with SONM, see the price is now very far from the price of ICO. Dev coin is not interested to enter a big exchanger like Bittrex. I've been holding him for a few months. And currently prices are still disappointing.
I'll keep it until I get a decent price.
I'll keep it until I get a decent price.
Although SONM’s founder left, the promises are on track. The developers are delivering as per plan so I still believe in this project.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
Can you please share your thooughts about why you think Elastic is the best? I am looking into it but it seems a bit complicated due to its own programming language, etc. Also, there is no info about their team.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
Abandoned = wrong. This is pure ignorance and misinformation. But maybe this is the difference also with XEL supporters?
Not cheap anymore? = Cheapness means good coin? What are we discussing here? How cheap a coin is or how good a coin is? I may have been misinformed.
Developed by part timers and volunteers = Oh no, we better abandon Bitcoin because it has a lot of part timers and volunteers.
From what i've read the original developer is no longer involved and the funds are gone? is this incorrect? Maybe it's unfair to say abandoned as i think it had something to do with illness(?) so apologies for that then
re: cheapness, i assume you're being willfully obtuse. We are discussing which coin would be the best investment, so it matters which has the most upside potential.
afaik bitcoin is working, whereas none of these are. in my view the coins that have funding and are being developed full time is likelier to deliver than the part timers without funding
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
Abandoned = wrong. This is pure ignorance and misinformation. But maybe this is the difference also with XEL supporters?
Not cheap anymore? = Cheapness means good coin? What are we discussing here? How cheap a coin is or how good a coin is? I may have been misinformed.
Developed by part timers and volunteers = Oh no, we better abandon Bitcoin because it has a lot of part timers and volunteers.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
abandoned coin that is not even cheap anymore and developed by part timers and volunteers is the best choice ?
iExec has a very promising team, but they do not have as much progress yet complete as Golem. I have invested in both Golem and iExec, because the tech they are working on is key. I`ve stayed away from SONM personally.
XEL Elastic is the best choice
I don't know if versus is correct terminology, but may I add Elastic into this list. They are different in quite a special sense as they are like how a lot of cryptos started: with part timers and volunteers. They had one negative issue which was one guy ran away with donated money but since no one invested, in a way no one lost anything.
I have read about the 3 cryptocurrencies and while Golem is more famous than the other two, I think that the latter two (especially SONM) are potentially better than Golem in the long term. However, when I googled 'SONM Scam', I get results about people who think it is a scam. There are no similar results found on Google about Golem or iExec. I am still unsure in which crypto I should invest. What do you guys think?
so may similiar projects, the lately one is enigma, which will ico in August, maybe time will tell us the answer
SONM investors got screwed immediately after ICO, you can find lots of info about what happened. I would be very careful with them. But thanks for bringin up iexec, I have never heard of this project.
SONM is a long term investment. I wouldnt comment on the other two because I do not have much knowledge. Sonm has lost almost half of its ico value. However if you believe in long term projects, I would suggest to diversify into these. Its cheaper right now in the days to come. Yes, their minus is communication. But they are working on their product. They have released Alpha. So be wise.
Completely agree mate .If the stupid team manage to communicate properly the price would have been 10X by now. The coins with silly little concept is doing much better than sonm. After all this is a super computer project should worth much more than what it is now. I know a fellow bought 200k coins with the same price as mine(36eth). Now he is in a huge profit but I am still in a loss. Hope one day it will pay back. Jump to: