Topic: Good projects/hard to reach softcap - page 2. (Read 1014 times)

Many projects face this issue because there is no trust like before in crypto as investors have lost trust and zeal to invest in IEO or ICO like before even the so call IEO and ICO isn't moving like before unless on a good exchange.

I can say that our project's founders have invested into about a year of development before even starting our token sale. It is true that the crypto startup space isn't generating as much investment as in the past, but we believe market sentiment has a lot to do with that. Even if we don't hit our softcap target, our project will still be moving forward, however it may mean we won't be able to have as many developers staffed at once. EZ Exchange will be launching in January regardless and we are working on partnerships with strong projects to list. We believe that we are likely to see a lot more investment into the token sale once the actual exchange is released and people will actually be able to use our exchange and see exactly what sets it apart from all the other slew of exchanges out there. We extended our token sale so that there would be overlap in which the exchange is released before the token sale ends. There is a huge lack of trust in the space atm too with a lot of scam projects, but we are to be delivering on phase 1 of our project before the token sale ends, and we will be planning a lot more marketing efforts at that point.

We believe having a viable product in which user's can see the result of our last year and a half's efforts will help to build trust significantly in our project's long-term outlook.

I am sorry to say that if I was a developer too, I might be tempted to actually do what most developers are doing now.

Imagine that u have had a plan in life to establish a business, and which is to be making e about $100k profit every year which is not a small profit for the next 50 years, which will be $5 million dollars as total profit, and then I come to the market to offer a project plan, which during the course of the campaign, I was able to raise $22 million dollars, is that not a profit for over a hundred years already, so tell me why I would stress myself again to start establishing the project, all I just need to do is create a project that investors will dump and then exit the market blaming the failure of the project on investors dumping. Is that not what most projects do?

Developers are the one to get the job done, they have to find way to attract investors to invest in their projects, if the project have something rare to offer it will be easier to get investors

I will say this, at the moment the topic of IEO is already dying away and it is difficult for all projects to collect the minimum threshold for starting a project, since again on this battlefield there are many scammers who spoil the reputation of the industry. When someone comes up with something new in order to at least somehow diversify the holding of such a fundraiser, then the industry will take a new breath of air and possibly be reborn and projects will again begin to raise money. I also think that if for a long time a project cannot build Softcap, then you should not pay attention to such a project.

Hat method do you use to actually know that the project is good when they have not been tested, before I can classify a project as being good, until I see that they have been tested in a way that they will witness dump and still survive, it is when a project has witnessed dump and survive that I will know that the product that it has is really a working one, because everything you are basing it on right now is what they have on their whitepaper, and probably because the team looks good to you.

If it is based on that, we have too many good projects that are available other than this two, but the only way you can really know how string they are is when they have been listed on exchange and then you see how much people will continue to patronize them.

The problem with EZ365 is that there are so many similiar projects like EZ365. Everyone wants to create crypto exchange / broker because it is probably the only one real use for ERC-20 tokens. Plus everyone wants to be at the beginning of something as big as Binance.

The initial fund needed to develop the project is Softcap. a fund is needed for the project to go further. Bitwings is a promising project, but I'm still not as confident as the EZ365 project. 

I really like the Bitwings project and I don't like EZ365. I will only participate in the Bitwings project

These two projects are good. I like both of these projects and look forward to it equally. I will join Bitwwins first and then I will participate in EZ365. and you ?

Good project Always good. every one wants to join and invest good project. Because every one don't wants to loss their capital.I think both project are good.

It does not always work in that way. it's possible those projects to have a hard time but that was not happening with all of the projects especially when it comes to the trusted and reliable project. They never meet a hardtime when ran crowdsale in the past. The problem was investors are losing their trust and they were feeling worried about the existence of scammers in this ecosystem. Scammer just like cancer.

the above mentioned projects are very good projects and i am very baffled at the fact that they both couldn't attain softcap but then again, even better projects hardly attain softcaps in this space due to the fact that investors have not truly enjoyed the rewards from previous ICOs invested and this has really affected the upcoming projects.

Indeed, investors had lost their trust to invest in an Ico project mostly got scam and lose money. Even it is a good project from the start it will ended up failed due to lack of strategy to get more investors. Like in bitwings I have heard this project they have an active team and lack of investors so it is best before we invest let us make research so our investment will not lose.

It's true that good projects is having a hard time reaching it's softcap and hardcap because of investors losing their trust to invest again in projects due to scams and fraud. It is the reason why some projects releases a coin that don't have any good value in the market because they didn't make their project successful.

More and more new projects are working on exchanges and I think the developer team wants to take the opportunity amid the increasingly familiar cryptocurrency. Maybe there aren't many investors who want to invest at this time, but if a new project starts launching its products, I think there will be many investors who want to invest

If a project is able to attract many investors and achieve sales targets, the developer team will definitely choose a good exchanger, who has a large amount of liquidity and transactions. With the right selection of exchangers, tokens on the market will be more attractive because investors will be interested in the project

Many only think about the money an ico raises but they do not realize that if an ico gets too much money then there is no one else to buy the coin and this means a very low volume, so many investors feel trapped in the coin since they cannot do anything else but to hold their coins and if one of the main holders get desperate then he will try to sell his holdings immediately crashing the value of that coin in the process, and for a new project this could a blow from which it never recovers.

Good projects on paper dont always cut it anymore for investors especially on Telegram. If you must raise a sizeable amount of money now from sales, you will need a good run of contact with vcs and investors in the blockchain sphere atleast with good working product and attractive bonuses, you can get initial funds for start up. EZ365 is an exchange and looks like it has a good team and foundation so might likely do well on the long run

I don't see any trends about these two projects and if they are good enough why they are having issues? Remember, all incoming projects are good and mostly, they are having a hard time because of their marketing strategies maybe lacking of it or THEY ARE NOT REALLY GOOD. That is my take on this.