Pages:
Author

Topic: Google looks into accepting Bitcoin... (Read 4112 times)

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
January 27, 2014, 08:23:40 AM
#46

to be very honest ... google could help bitcoin community by helping business and start-ups surround bitcoin, got couples ideas about it ... it would be win-win situation ... hope theywill not start challenge our community ( made of fanatics ) they will have a lot to loose about their "cool-company-image" ... it would be a huge scare in their face ... 



What is there not to get about the Battle of Thermopylae?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Thermopylae

Seems like you are willing to make your last stand.

Excellent move.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
January 27, 2014, 07:52:24 AM
#45

to be very honest ... google could help bitcoin community by helping business and start-ups surround bitcoin, got couples ideas about it ... it would be win-win situation ... hope theywill not start challenge our community ( made of fanatics ) they will have a lot to loose about their "cool-company-image" ... it would be a huge scare in their face ... 

hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 26, 2014, 09:40:22 PM
#43
Of course, I'd be more then happy to do that - right now. How would I post the result so it's all above board? Or, if you could walk me through it via PM?
Either way, excellent idea.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Stand on the shoulders of giants
January 26, 2014, 09:04:33 PM
#42
They basically said exactly that they aren't doing the thing in the "email conversation". They can't really get more direct than that.

Uh and remember this?

Nice. You just exposed yourself as someone who believes the email is fake. Tin foil hat. You just make yourself look sillier and sillier  Grin Cheesy  At this point you would have more of an impact on forum reader opinions if you started stating the opposite of what you want people to believe. At this point, people just use you as a negative indicator of anything you write.

I think we can check if the email is fake or not by checking it's dkim signature

http://dkim.org/

http://www.appmaildev.com/en/dkim/

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 03:44:34 PM
#41
Not new, registered almost a year ago. I just lurk. There's some really intelligent discussion on these forums.. but also some serious trollage.

Regardless, maybe Forbes and Wired and Vice and all of them are foolish enough to fall for my evil genius hoax(?!).. and you in your infinite wisdom are smarter.  Cheesy

you are the one smug about it.

For all I care it's all bullshit, the emails, the article, the disputing and your association with the whole thing.  Roll Eyes
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 26, 2014, 03:41:45 PM
#40
Not new, registered almost a year ago. I just lurk. There's some really intelligent discussion on these forums.. but also some serious trollage.

Regardless, maybe Forbes and Wired and Vice and all of them are foolish enough to fall for my evil genius hoax(?!).. and you in your infinite wisdom are smarter.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 03:32:13 PM
#39
Blah, blah, blah it's always the same with this kind of stuff. You got busted, and if google hadn't used the same exact terminology to deny it there would be a margin for interpretation.
But now there is not.

This is what the rest of the world thinks, and of course there is broad support in this forum for this kind of hoax, but they'd cheer for everything as previously mentioned.

Excuse me.. busted? Busted doing what exactly? I think vindicated is a more appropriate word. Are you suggesting the emails were fake and Sridhar didn't say what I attribute?
take a hint.

Taking credit for something like that in form of a new bitcointalk forum account and posting here, on the speculation forum can also have to do with it, maybe.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 26, 2014, 02:44:30 PM
#38
Blah, blah, blah it's always the same with this kind of stuff. You got busted, and if google hadn't used the same exact terminology to deny it there would be a margin for interpretation.
But now there is not.

This is what the rest of the world thinks, and of course there is broad support in this forum for this kind of hoax, but they'd cheer for everything as previously mentioned.

Excuse me.. busted? Busted doing what exactly? I think vindicated is a more appropriate word. Are you suggesting the emails were fake and Sridhar didn't say what I attribute?
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 01:44:39 PM
#37
Blah, blah, blah it's always the same with this kind of stuff. You got busted, and if google hadn't used the same exact terminology to deny it there would be a margin for interpretation.
But now there is not.

This is what the rest of the world thinks, and of course there is broad support in this forum for this kind of hoax, but they'd cheer for everything as previously mentioned.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 26, 2014, 01:27:11 PM
#36
It's not fake guys. For Gods sakes.. that's a really silly accusation. I even challenged TheNextWeb.com, which took it upon itself to say the emails "were too good to be true".. insinuating they are bullshit. I challenged that if they can get Google to deny Sridhar said those words to me in an email I would give TheNextWeb 10 btc and the "journalist" who wrote that 10 BTC, and use Seans Outpost founder Jason as a trusted escrow party. They haven't responded to my challenge.

The emails are not fake, and Sridhar said what he said. Same with Vic and Ariel Bardin.

What you can take away from Sridhars words are a matter of personal choice, but he said what he said.

Google can say "we have no current plans regarding bitcoin", just like I have no current plans to use the bathroom to relieve myself.. but I'm sure I will inevitably have to at some point during the day.

Forbes, Vice, Business Insider, The Daily Dot, Coindesk etc etc all authenticated the email exchanges and even more I had with Ariel that I did not publicly post.

Take away what you want to take away. Believe or not. Tinfoil hat or reality. Your choice.

Laters!
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 05:18:37 AM
#35
I dare you to dig through my posts where I make any prediction about the price of bitcoins. It shouldn't take longer than an hour come on do it. Wink

you've been wrong about most things since I first noticed you ... and i stopped reading you soon after, circa mid 2011 ...

If that gives you a feeling of accomplishment that's quite poor.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
January 26, 2014, 05:15:59 AM
#34
I dare you to dig through my posts where I make any prediction about the price of bitcoins. It shouldn't take longer than an hour come on do it. Wink

you've been wrong about most things since I first noticed you ... and i stopped reading you soon after, circa mid 2011 ...
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 05:13:12 AM
#33
I dare you to dig through my posts where I make any prediction about the price of bitcoins. It shouldn't take longer than an hour come on do it. Wink
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
January 26, 2014, 05:10:56 AM
#32
I'm just writing what most people think who aren't bothering to post here at a sunday noon.  Cheesy

All I will say for anyone who reads your posts and thinks for a moment any of them have an ounce of truth in them, to take 15 minutes and read through your history of posts dating back to mid 2011. Then when they are overcome by your historical abilities to be wrong about a wide array of topics they can marvel at the fact that you aren't a retired multi-millioniare today, given the fact that you were mining in the early days and have been here since almost the beginning.


bingo! ... we have a winner.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 05:10:22 AM
#31
Now you're making up stuff again, just like you're saying I did say something about overstock before they became a bitpay partner, I didn't even know about their existence before they announced their partnership.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
January 26, 2014, 05:08:03 AM
#30
I'm just writing what most people think who aren't bothering to post here at a sunday noon.  Cheesy

All I will say for anyone who reads your posts and thinks for a moment any of them have an ounce of truth in them, to take 15 minutes and read through your history of posts dating back to mid 2011. Then when they are overcome by your historical abilities to be wrong about a wide array of topics they can marvel at the fact that you aren't a retired multi-millioniare today, given the fact that you were mining in the early days and have been here since almost the beginning.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
One Token to Move Anything Anywhere
January 26, 2014, 05:02:37 AM
#29
I'm just writing what most people think who aren't bothering to post here at a sunday noon.  Cheesy

And while we write Bitcoin takes off again!
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
January 26, 2014, 05:01:02 AM
#28
I'm just writing what most people think who aren't bothering to post here at a sunday noon.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
January 26, 2014, 04:55:15 AM
#27
They basically said exactly that they aren't doing the thing in the "email conversation". They can't really get more direct than that.

Uh and remember this?

Nice. You just exposed yourself as someone who believes the email is fake. Tin foil hat. You just make yourself look sillier and sillier  Grin Cheesy  At this point you would have more of an impact on forum reader opinions if you started stating the opposite of what you want people to believe. At this point, people just use you as a negative indicator of anything you write.
Pages:
Jump to: