he also pretends to detest government money. by mentioning government and rothchild divide and conquer agenda.
but here is the thing.
he himself is playing the divide and conquer game by trying to make core the victim who should win dictatorship. by pointing cores failures in the opposite direction.. rather than think/talk/ mention consensus of no kings.
ending his post with his ultimate desire.. to exit bitcoin when he can get $2000 of that government money he pretends to detest per coin.
"They will not stop $2,000 from happening this year."
here is some things that he needs to realise.
1. the drama of the PBOC visit btcc, irs visit circle and coinbase began from the blockstream rumour mill.. barry silbert(DCG) has ownership stakes in:
BTCC, coinbase, blockstream, and.. coindesk
so the rumour mill made a normal regulatory inspection sound like an attack. like barry's companies are being victimised. etc etc.
all of which is meaningless crap. because it does not affect consensus of the network or the code.
but the OP subtly is making it sound like core is the victim and if people stay in the sheep stroking arms of core, the price will rise to $2k this year
please wake up people and care more about consensus and the code
It has already been thought and talked. Bitcoin Unlimited is dogshit and will fail as soon as the dev team has to start taking real decisions in a real scenario. They would not be able to get anything done without copy-pasting 99% of Core's code.
Bitcoin Unlimited will lead to node centralization, period, stop being delusional about this. They will also lead to a fatal bug because they are reckless compared to the conservative and adult approach of Core.
Bitcoin is either digital gold (with a 2nd layer on top for the currency features) or it's BUcoin with a centralized network and guaranteed disaster long term (or even mid).