Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed Legitimate

zhangweiwu

sr. member

Activity: 313

Merit: 250

Quote from: bennybong on February 27, 2014, 07:38:09 AM

If I had that many bitcoins under my control I would be checking the balance daily, just to remind me how rich I was. Wink

Bullshit did he not know what was going on. Utter bullshit.

All of the lost coins, around 770k. To give you an idea how rich you are, at the price of 600USD, Chuck Lorre (creator of "Big Ban Theory" telenovela)'s net worth is 600million by 2011, that equals to 1000k bitcoins. This is to remind you that there are a lot of people who can afford losing this much money - a lot can afford to bid MtGox but as I posted previously, only a few people has existing reputation in Bitcoin history whom if assigned CEO can save the business.

bennybong

hero member

Activity: 682

Merit: 500

If I had that many bitcoins under my control I would be checking the balance daily, just to remind me how rich I was. Wink

Bullshit did he not know what was going on. Utter bullshit.

Lloydie

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: zhangweiwu on February 27, 2014, 03:34:44 AM

This is a English learner's question: Why he said "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed Legitimate" instead of "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed genuine" or "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed authentic"? Am I right that this is a mis-use of "Legitimate"?

I believe he used the word legitimate in the sense that it was not a fake document written by the releaser of the document, twobitidiot or some other person.

zhangweiwu

sr. member

Activity: 313

Merit: 250

This is a English learner's question: Why he said "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed Legitimate" instead of "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed genuine" or "Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed authentic"? Am I right that this is a mis-use of "Legitimate"?

Lloydie

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Yep. Either Mark traded whilst insolvent or MTGox's cold storage will pop up somewhere.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

Quote from: GeniuSxBoY on February 26, 2014, 08:58:58 PM

Quote from: windjc on February 26, 2014, 08:44:45 PM

From the interview I read between Mark and Jon Fisher, it seems apparently clear that Mark is operating from a state of denial. All the speculation that there has been regarding Gox over the years, I had dismissed 99% of it as garbage. But in this case, I now fully expect much of it to found out as true.

I think Mark has committed gross criminal activities. And I think he will be indicted for them. I do not necessarily think that Mark is a criminal mastermind, instead I think his criminal actions, if he took them, were driven by hubris, panic, and denial of severity.

Throwing around terms like "gross criminal activities" when you have no idea what's going on is like pointing your finger and yelling witch. It's all fun and games until some random person points to you.

True. But I am speculating. If Mark took peoples deposits and allowed trading while knowingly being insolvent he broke the law in a very big way. If Mark in any way robbed Peter to pay Paul or traded from his exchange to another to try and raise capital, he broke the law. Maybe he didn't. But I would not bet on it.

GeniuSxBoY

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: windjc on February 26, 2014, 08:44:45 PM

From the interview I read between Mark and Jon Fisher, it seems apparently clear that Mark is operating from a state of denial. All the speculation that there has been regarding Gox over the years, I had dismissed 99% of it as garbage. But in this case, I now fully expect much of it to found out as true.

I think Mark has committed gross criminal activities. And I think he will be indicted for them. I do not necessarily think that Mark is a criminal mastermind, instead I think his criminal actions, if he took them, were driven by hubris, panic, and denial of severity.

Throwing around terms like "gross criminal activities" when you have no idea what's going on is like pointing your finger and yelling witch. It's all fun and games until some random person points to you.

windjc

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1070

From the interview I read between Mark and Jon Fisher, it seems apparently clear that Mark is operating from a state of denial. All the speculation that there has been regarding Gox over the years, I had dismissed 99% of it as garbage. But in this case, I now fully expect much of it to found out as true.

I think Mark has committed gross criminal activities. And I think he will be indicted for them. I do not necessarily think that Mark is a criminal mastermind, instead I think his criminal actions, if he took them, were driven by hubris, panic, and denial of severity.

Gordon Bleu

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

verified ✔

Facebook paid 1 Billion for Instagram, so 500'000'000 for Gox would be nice, with 1 Billion sure all could get their Coins back

johnyj

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1012

Beyond Imagination

I still think that there is something much bigger going on, and they made up this story to cover what is really happening

theomar

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Karpeles has a lot of bitcoins. He is an early adopter and he was running one of the biggest exchanges. He must have more than 100k btc for himself in cold storage which was not related with mtgox. He is not an idiot he is told to pretend it. For sure a lot of bitcoins may have been lost but the problem here is the trust. If mtgox enable bitcoin withdrawals and the 550k costomers or a portion of them loose trust and try to sell their bitcoins then the price will go down down down... So the best strategy for him and for big investors is to claim that all btc had been lost if the majority eat that manipulation. The "leaked" document and the irc conversion is for testing reactions.

Pure manipulation...

eldentyrell

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1004

felonious vagrancy, personified

Quote from: traderCJ on February 26, 2014, 12:06:39 AM

So you're telling me he reads this thing, sees the bolded 744,408 BTC and doesn't mention to the media that the big, glaring, scary figure in bold is wrong? Hogwash.

He gave a three-word reply. Not even a grammatically complete sentence.

So he didn't mention it. He barely mentioned anything.

barbs

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

I think the reduction of liabilities is why he's driven the price down to 130 on his exchange.

When they liquidate they can settle the number of BITCOINS against that 130 price in each account and tell people here you are funds are back ie 6btcx 130 gox price at shut down = 700ish usd.

No btcs again.

And he had he balls to blame bitcoin.

I hope he gets the shit beaten out of him for deception.

anth0ny

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: derpinheimer on February 26, 2014, 12:18:48 AM

So how on earth did they remain operational at all from 2013 onwards???

Lessee...

"On 22 February 2013, following an introduction of new anti-money laundering requirements by Dwolla, some Dwolla accounts became temporarily restricted." "The funds were finally returned on May 3, more than 3 months later". (And following a 400% or more increase in the $/BTC exchange rate.)

"Mt. Gox suspended trading on 11 April 2013 until 12 April 2013 2am UTC for a 'market cooldown'."

"Mt. Gox suspended withdrawals in US dollars on June 20, 2013. On July 4, 2013, Mt. Gox announced that it had 'fully resumed' withdrawals, but as of September 5, 2013, few US dollar withdrawals had been successfully completed."

"On August 5, 2013, Mt. Gox announced that they have incurred 'significant losses' due to crediting deposits which had not fully cleared. Mt. Gox announced that new deposits would no longer be credited until the funds transfer to Mt. Gox is fully completed."

"Wired Magazine reported in November 2013 that customers were experiencing delays of weeks to months in withdrawing funds from their accounts."

---

I have a hard time feeling any sympathy for anyone who made significant deposits to Mt. Gox after February 2013.

hostmaster

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: traderCJ on February 25, 2014, 07:18:29 PM

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/02/26/irc-chat-with-mark-karpeles-confirms-leaked-documents-authenticity-mt-gox-currently-seeking-bail-out/

So .. 750,000 coins actually are "missing" from Gox. Hoe lee sheet.

hard to believe.

lyth0s

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1000

World Class Cryptonaire

If Gox's accounting book included fake coins (goxcoins) then they could potentially continue to see that their amount of bitcoins is continually increasing (via the books and thus look like they are making money) while their actual amount of real bitcoins is declining (but not able to see this via the accounting books so that less people know about gox being a fractional BTC reserve). The whole problem about having to continually having to manually refill the hot wallet from the cold wallet could easily be explained if they actually don't have a cold wallet, rather just a few hot wallets that are all linked and auto-refill the main hot wallet when the hot wallet becomes low.

derpinheimer

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

True. But we know Mr Karpeles is always very evasive. Even when he could say something not damaging to himself and his company, he'd rather say nothing, at least it seems.

I mean, really.. 750k coins? There were that many HODLERS on gox?

Lets say 700k of the theft occured when bitcoin was <$10. This is probably how it did go down.

How will that work out? I'm trying to think it out and it seems like regardless of the point in time the theft took place, its still valued at 300m USD now, is that correct? So how on earth did they remain operational at all from 2013 onwards??? Hard to wrap my head around it...

anth0ny

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: eldentyrell on February 25, 2014, 11:53:45 PM

But honestly the only way this 750k number can be real is if they were fractional reserving and that was their phony ledger entry backed by only 75,000 coins.

Like Madoff or Enron, both of which probably had much more scrutiny than Mt. Gox. It's certainly possible.

Fractional reserving, "borrowing" the funds, hoping to pay them back off the rise in $/BTC, and then when $/BTC falls 50% and doesn't come back, and you're about to get caught, try to blame the losses on transaction malleability. Also possible.

Hopefully there will be an honest investigation and one day we'll know what happened, and how it happened, and who is responsible.

traderCJ

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: eldentyrell on February 25, 2014, 11:18:26 PM

Quote from: traderCJ on February 25, 2014, 07:18:29 PM

http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/02/26/irc-chat-with-mark-karpeles-confirms-leaked-documents-authenticity-mt-gox-currently-seeking-bail-out/

So .. 750,000 coins actually are "missing" from Gox. Hoe lee sheet.

Misleading headline.

When asked if the plan was legit, Karpeles' reply was "more or less … this document was not produced by MtGox".

I think "more or less [legitimate]" easily encompasses "yes, most of it is true, except the numbers were grossly exaggerated". At this point I don't think he can comment on anything numbers-related, even to point out that they are the part of the document that is "less" legit.

Oh for crying out loud ..

[10:58] Is that Crisis Strategy Draft even legit?
[11:04] more or less
[11:05] as the name suggests it’s a draft, and it’s a bunch of proposals to deal with the issue at hand, not things that are actually planned and/or done
[11:06] this said this document was not produced by MtGox

He's obviously seen it before and it was written by some sort of crisis mitigation team. That team didn't just pull numbers out of their asses. They based it on some information provided by Gox so they had something to work with. Notice how in the crisis slides, this is bolded: "At this point 744,408 BTC are missing due to malleability-related theft which went unnoticed for several years.". So you're telling me he reads this thing, sees the bolded 744,408 BTC and doesn't mention to the media that the big, glaring, scary figure in bold is wrong? Hogwash.

eldentyrell

donator

Activity: 980

Merit: 1004

felonious vagrancy, personified

Quote from: traderCJ on February 25, 2014, 07:53:54 PM

Quote from: anth0ny on February 25, 2014, 07:49:08 PM

Quote from: traderCJ on February 25, 2014, 07:18:29 PM

So .. 750,000 coins actually are "missing" from Gox. Hoe lee sheet.

Sounds deflationary. The M1 of bitcoin just went down by 750,000 BTC (6%), no?

If they have never been sold and never will be, then sure.

If they exist (which I doubt) they've either already been sold or else won't be sold for several years. Both scenarios are deflationary.

But honestly the only way this 750k number can be real is if they were fractional reserving and that was their phony ledger entry backed by only 75,000 coins. That's deflationary too, though only because of the widespread perception that goxcoins were real.

Topic: Gox Crisis Management Plan Confirmed Legitimate (Read 3918 times)