Im not trying to take away from the OP, but I just wonder why there is such a wide variation in reported power consumption...
Even if you take the PF into account, it wouldn't cause a variation of a 2x unless im missing somthing here...
There are a handful of factors dictating other people's power readings...
1. If they are using a single unit on a USB right off their PC/laptop and measuring off the included power supply... they arent getting the full read as the board inside is powered by the USB port itself.
2. If they are measuring multiple units on a powered USB hub attached to the controller, then you are getting a slightly inflated rate based on all the extra hardware that is not the device itself.
3. If they are measuring this using the included power brick, that is going to be different than the power usage from a PSU using a molex to barrel jack connection.
4. If they are using a single unit, then that can still only give you an idea because some of these units have already shown they are faster/slower than others which means they pull more/less power than others.
5. Depending on your power source, you have the efficiency factor
6. Depending on what kind of USB hub you are using when measuring multiple devices can cause a variation in power rate based on what kind of power supply you have for the hub
7. Out of the box the miners have a script for running at 600 frequency which draws very little power... some people are increasing this to 850/900/more so it draws more power... these increases can vary in power draw based on how well the miner is put together and the 5 chips quality.
Just a handful or things that make everyone's readouts different for these things...