I'll try to chip in on anything that I think is worth mentioning. Depending on what you want for the guide it would likely be best to make it complete, and include examples.
Disclaimer: This is just my personal policy/format, and isn't endorsed by the forum. Here's my two cents:
1. When reporting a thread which is in the wrong section specify where you think it belongs, and if it's not easily identifable offer an explanation why you think so. [e]
2. When reporting a post for plagiarism include a link to the original source/post. [e]
3. When reporting a user check their post history, and identify if they are making similar posts throughout their posts. If they are report one of their posts, and leave a comment in the report field stating this. [e]
4. If reporting someone for a malicious link/malware include any evidence that you can. Sometimes
Total Virus can identify malicious links/programs. [e]
5. When reporting someone for duplicate posts/threads include a link to the others. [e]
6. When reporting multiple bumps it's best to report the earliest bump and only that one, and include a comment in the report field that there's more in the thread. [e]
7. When reporting someone for ban evasion include a link to their profile, and the topic/post that proves they are the same person. [e]
8. When reporting someone for not following local thread rules. Quote the local rule, and explain why they have broken it. [e]
9. If you suspect a user of using an automated translation then include why you think so, and also a link to the translation text would be beneficial. [e]
10. If you are reporting posts similar to: "Great post", "Great project" or "This project rocks my socks off" then check the OP of the ANN thread, their website or social media and see if they are offering an incentive to post. If they are report the OP rather than individual posts. [e]
Examples: 1. A thread asking a question related to the forum which has been posted in Bitcoin Discussion should be reported as some variation of this: "Wrong section doesn't belong in Bitcoin discussion. Move to Bitcoin Forum > Other > Meta. as it's asking a question about the forum."
2. "plagiarism without providing a source: <
link to original source/post>"
3. "Spam. Please check this users post history as they have made several of these types of posts"
4. "Spreading malware. Total virus has identified that this could be malware:" <
totalvirus>" link.
5. "Duplicate post/thread: <
link to duplicate>
6. "Multiple bumps in thread."
7. "This user is ban evading: <
link to profile> here's the post connecting the two accounts: <
link to connection>
8. The user that's being reported has started a discussion within the thread. "Broken local rule. 'Do not post discussion here only bids'"
9. "This post is badly translated, and doesn't make sense. Suspected automated translation. Please check here for an identical translation:
https://translate.google.co.uk/#auto/ar/This%20is%20an%20example"
10. "Offering an incentive to post by rewarding those who do with a bonus, please check: <
link to evidence>"
I have been waiting for this thread as I've remembered you mentioned making this kind of thread on another topic.
Question:
For checking plagiarism, isn't there any plagiarism tool available on the internet to check if either the post of a specific member is copied or not. I don't remember the name of the tools but it is easy to search for them in the forum or is it based on your experienced that pasting it in the google search is much better than a plagiarizing tool?
Yes, there's actually quite a few out there or you could just search up the sentences on Google yourself. Here's an example of
one Also, I don't really follow detecting the homograph attacks. Can you please elaborate it more?
Basically, a few users have tried to prevent staff from detecting their plagiarism by changing certain characters to others which look the same, and therefore don't impact readability. This can sometimes prevent copying a piece of text, and trying to find out it's source as the characters are slightly different. Another, method that some members have used in the past is changing words that mean the same, but aren't spelled the same. For example, one could replace "But" with "However". Which makes it harder to identify plagiarism. Online tools normally incorporate this. Plus, if you suspect a user is using one of the methods above just search up without words that are easily changed but, mean the same, and you should yield results. I'm struggling to find a way to show an example which would be clear, and concise. Hopefully someone else can chime in with an example.