Pages:
Author

Topic: {HALTED} BitEnlarge.com - 5% Daily For 7 Days, Principle Back - Transparent - page 3. (Read 8548 times)

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

User   Date   Risked BTC amount   Reference   Comments
Lutpin 7: -0 / +4   2016-02-21   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting a ponzi scheme with a referral link in their signature.
mexxer-2 13: -0 / +5   2016-02-21   0.00000000      Promoting a ref link to a ponzi site in his signature.


here's why criticize you: you guys know judging others

you guys do not have proof that the site is to promote ponzi

make assumption

  it is true that mining in the cloud profit is very little and this has

and this company does not show their equipment and there's a lot that does not confer.

but you two gave me negative

and even seeing now that you guys pulled out the signature link with still this negative what is called that?

how can we trust you two when we know that you guys judge people and when they try to correct you guys not correct too?

I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse

then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something

Dude you're as pathetic as they come. People like you deteriorate the bitcoin community ... States that you hate scammers on your profile, yet you offer your coins to scammers and not only that , on many threads, you beggars ask for coins to in intent to 'test' . It's been known for long that anyone who promotes a ponzi by either starting a site or wearing a signature will get tagged. This is not to bring them down but its to serve as a notice to other 'naive' newbies here in the community.

edit :


how old you guys have?

I say this because I can imagine that you guys have 2 more than 35 years and I'm much lower than that

Can imagine you being 15

's funny, very funny!
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1042
www.explorerz.top
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 501

User   Date   Risked BTC amount   Reference   Comments
Lutpin 7: -0 / +4   2016-02-21   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting a ponzi scheme with a referral link in their signature.
mexxer-2 13: -0 / +5   2016-02-21   0.00000000      Promoting a ref link to a ponzi site in his signature.


here's why criticize you: you guys know judging others

you guys do not have proof that the site is to promote ponzi

make assumption

  it is true that mining in the cloud profit is very little and this has

and this company does not show their equipment and there's a lot that does not confer.

but you two gave me negative

and even seeing now that you guys pulled out the signature link with still this negative what is called that?

how can we trust you two when we know that you guys judge people and when they try to correct you guys not correct too?

I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse

then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something

Dude you're as pathetic as they come. People like you deteriorate the bitcoin community ... States that you hate scammers on your profile, yet you offer your coins to scammers and not only that , on many threads, you beggars ask for coins to in intent to 'test' . It's been known for long that anyone who promotes a ponzi by either starting a site or wearing a signature will get tagged. This is not to bring them down but its to serve as a notice to other 'naive' newbies here in the community.

edit :


how old you guys have?

I say this because I can imagine that you guys have 2 more than 35 years and I'm much lower than that

Can imagine you being 15
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
It was what I said, knife as you want

to neutral?

wait 15 days? why wait 15 days if you can delete now and not cost you anything to do this?

I think the problem here is ages

how old you guys have?

I say this because I can imagine that you guys have 2 more than 35 years and I'm much lower than that
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
Really? So where are your voice and opinion to all the other scams here?
Where is your voice when DualBitcoin gets our money and STILL "advertice" that he is "paying"?
You came here to support Mexxer, not me.
Not the "fool", not the "blind", not the "ignorant".
Just your buddy.
You expect someone to spend their time educating you fools? Anyway, keep acting as if nothing happened, my neg's not going to be removed and thats the end of the story. Blame me, curse me, thats all you can do.

I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse

then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something
You are double-crossing fool, thats all you are:
Wait for 15 days for me to reconsider the negative, if you do not repeat the act in that period I'll change it to neutral


I hate scammer as you, but do everything as you see fit Grin

Sorry "Master of the Smartones"... Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Streamity Decentralized cryptocurrency exchange
Assuming by {HALTED} and all the comments that this "BitEnlarge" has already stopped paying.

Shame for all those who threw some coins in there. I got whatever amount he gave for the giveaway at the beginning and then left it. 7 days... they never stay around for 7 days!  Roll Eyes

Let's just wait until the next one pops up offering a free giveaway too  Grin
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
Really? So where are your voice and opinion to all the other scams here?
Where is your voice when DualBitcoin gets our money and STILL "advertice" that he is "paying"?
You came here to support Mexxer, not me.
Not the "fool", not the "blind", not the "ignorant".
Just your buddy.
You expect someone to spend their time educating you fools? Anyway, keep acting as if nothing happened, my neg's not going to be removed and thats the end of the story. Blame me, curse me, thats all you can do.

I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse

then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something
You are double-crossing fool, thats all you are:
Wait for 15 days for me to reconsider the negative, if you do not repeat the act in that period I'll change it to neutral


I hate scammer as you, but do everything as you see fit Grin
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0

User   Date   Risked BTC amount   Reference   Comments
Lutpin 7: -0 / +4   2016-02-21   0.00000000   Reference   Promoting a ponzi scheme with a referral link in their signature.
mexxer-2 13: -0 / +5   2016-02-21   0.00000000      Promoting a ref link to a ponzi site in his signature.


here's why criticize you: you guys know judging others

you guys do not have proof that the site is to promote ponzi

make assumption

  it is true that mining in the cloud profit is very little and this has

and this company does not show their equipment and there's a lot that does not confer.

but you two gave me negative

and even seeing now that you guys pulled out the signature link with still this negative what is called that?

how can we trust you two when we know that you guys judge people and when they try to correct you guys not correct too?

I have sent PM to ask them to remove this negative but you guys refuse

then sent to the PM moderator for him to do something
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
Strength and integrety with my money?
No, with our opinion and voice. As for the problem with OP holding your money:

Dont get blinded by OP, its the decision of smit1237 alone to withhold your coins.

Really? So where are your voice and opinion to all the other scams here?
Where is your voice when DualBitcoin gets our money and STILL "advertice" that he is "paying"?
You came here to support Mexxer, not me.
Not the "fool", not the "blind", not the "ignorant".
Just your buddy.
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Strength and integrety with my money?
No, with our opinion and voice. As for the problem with OP holding your money:

Dont get blinded by OP, its the decision of smit1237 alone to withhold your coins.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
-snip-
Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.
No its not better to back down because of pressure.
Actually, at that point, if we allow someone to get through with it, others will also try.
It's about showing strengh and integrety.

If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.
A post disappears, a rating from DT does not. OP does not need an excuse and you know it, they can just go whenever they think its no longer worth it. If its sooner, great because less people are scammed. Do you just complain because you still have funds with OP?
Even more in a self-moderated topic.

Strength and integrety with my money? Huh
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
-snip-
Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.

No its not better to back down because of pressure.

If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.

A post disappears, a rating from DT does not. OP does not need an excuse and you know it, they can just go whenever they think its no longer worth it. If its sooner, great because less people are scammed. Do you just complain because you still have funds with OP?

I dont understand your question...
I put my money in his "program", yes.
I complain because he use as an excuse the red from Mexxer and its easy for him to remove it.
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
-snip-
Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.
No its not better to back down because of pressure.
Actually, at that point, if we allow someone to get through with it, others will also try.
It's about showing strengh and integrety.

If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.
A post disappears, a rating from DT does not. OP does not need an excuse and you know it, they can just go whenever they think its no longer worth it. If its sooner, great because less people are scammed. Do you just complain because you still have funds with OP?
Even more in a self-moderated topic.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
-snip-
Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.

No its not better to back down because of pressure.

If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.

A post disappears, a rating from DT does not. OP does not need an excuse and you know it, they can just go whenever they think its no longer worth it. If its sooner, great because less people are scammed. Do you just complain because you still have funds with OP?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Live by your own rules
Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.
If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.

Dude, the red is just AN excuse. If it wasnt this one, it would have been he was hacked, the wallet or site has had a hacker, ... Get over it, you lost your coins.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
-snip-
I understand your position, but has a warning it at the top of the topic and I think that is enough

Maybe you understand, but you seem unable to tolerate it. I dont think the warning for the section is enough.

if you guys are giving negative to all who create sites ponzi then you are God?

No, its funny though that this is a common "accusation". Its actually a pain in the arse to argue with people that dont want to understand you for the sake of the few that read along.

I believe that responsibility to give negative or positive it is only those who invested

You have not understood the trust system here. Anyone can leave any rating they like, unless they spam someones trust page. In case of spam an admin might get involed.




-snip-
You dont understand nothing! I am not blind or fool or any insulting words you say about me.
I dont support anyone, i dont trust any OP and for sure i dont distract!
Its my thing to put my money where ever i want. MY THING!
Mexxer give him an excuse, thank you for your help...

You should be allowed to invest in any shady programm you may (you are) the OP should be allowed to promote their shady programm here (they are), but mexxer-2 should not allow issue a warning if they see something they consider shady. Do you not see the hypocrisy?



you are right!
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1103
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
-snip-
I understand your position, but has a warning it at the top of the topic and I think that is enough

Maybe you understand, but you seem unable to tolerate it. I dont think the warning for the section is enough.

if you guys are giving negative to all who create sites ponzi then you are God?

No, its funny though that this is a common "accusation". Its actually a pain in the arse to argue with people that dont want to understand you for the sake of the few that read along.

I believe that responsibility to give negative or positive it is only those who invested

You have not understood the trust system here. Anyone can leave any rating they like, unless they spam someones trust page. In case of spam an admin might get involed.

-snip-
You dont understand nothing! I am not blind or fool or any insulting words you say about me.
I dont support anyone, i dont trust any OP and for sure i dont distract!
Its my thing to put my money where ever i want. MY THING!
Mexxer give him an excuse, thank you for your help...

You should be allowed to invest in any shady programm you may (you are) the OP should be allowed to promote their shady programm here (they are), but mexxer-2 should not allow issue a warning if they see something they consider shady. Do you not see the hypocrisy?



Of course i can see it! But to remove a neg and left any OP without excuses its better.
If somebody wants to give a warning, all he have to do is getting to the topic and wright his opinion about it.
With the red, you give the excuse to any OP to held the money.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
This game is ENDED.

Wait for my game.

I will publish one in late march.

With no scam, no running, just gambling

If you want to join wait until the time has come.


This game is for everyone who tired of being scammed,
lose money by your luck is better than been scammed.

Stay tuned, wait till march, and see Smiley


Good luck
[/size][/size]

[/font][/size]
Pages:
Jump to: