Pages:
Author

Topic: Halving = Less Miners = Slower Transactions - page 3. (Read 1977 times)

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
If there are less miners, difficulty decreases and thus increasing profit. It's an endless cycle.

Decrease at next diff. adjutment, not right away.
But there's no reason for miners to shut down right away. Mining at a loss might be worth it to drive the competition out of business. It's a Mexican standoff.

Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Clearly another moron.  Even if we only have two miners, blocks go every 10 minutes.

Clearly another moron. At current difficulty, a block would *never* be solved with just 2 miners. Blocks are solved in *about* ten minutes at current difficulty and current hashrate.  Cut the hashrate, and the time to solve a block increases proportionally. Cut it enough, and you'll never get to the next difficulty adjustment.

I know right, some people think they know everything
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Clearly another moron.  Even if we only have two miners, blocks go every 10 minutes.  We get 1 MB worth of transactions no matter how many miners.  So, halving does nothing to slow transactions.

The community is full of idiots.

You are a complete moron, look what you said
God damn
hero member
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
If there are less miners, difficulty decreases and thus increasing profit. It's an endless cycle.

Decrease at next diff. adjutment, not right away.
But there's no reason for miners to shut down right away. Mining at a loss might be worth it to drive the competition out of business. It's a Mexican standoff.

Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Clearly another moron.  Even if we only have two miners, blocks go every 10 minutes.

Clearly another moron. At current difficulty, a block would *never* be solved with just 2 miners. Blocks are solved in *about* ten minutes at current difficulty and current hashrate.  Cut the hashrate, and the time to solve a block increases proportionally. Cut it enough, and you'll never get to the next difficulty adjustment.
Clearly the biggest dumbshit ever.  I didn't agree to your stupid condition 'current difficulty'.  The difficult is automatically adjusted.  So - if only two miners there would have been a serious lowering of difficulty

Why do you say I am wrong - and then impose an impossible constraint on the problem?  What a dumbass.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly

talking without any proof is easy. you can say anything you like but that doesn't make any of it true.

in this case unless you can provide any legitimate information on the costs of mining for the miners (electricity, ...) then your words are pointless. because i say miners are still earning A LOT of profit even with half the reward.
only in china where the electricity cost is very cheap ,the source of energy from coal and been proven cheaper,different if you ask to those miners whose live in 1st tier country,the profit after halving only could afford the electricity not for the living needs monthly except having so damn many rigs

~snippet
people who don't get into programming language would think != is "equal"
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1010
BTC to the moon is inevitable...
you have to understand these first before you can give your opinion about miners which you clearly don't have any idea about their operation.

halving == less block reward
halving == less profit for miners
BUT
halving != minus profit


in other words less profit doesn't mean minus profit or loss, it is still profit.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
A question to the older members here would be to ask if there was this much worry and fud in the last halving? Surely back then miners where in the same situation that if we never got a price rise then it would become unprofitable to continue to mine and miners would drop out left right and centre. yet we are at another block halving and miners are still doing their thing.
member
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
talking without any proof is easy. you can say anything you like but that doesn't make any of it true.

because i say miners are still earning A LOT of profit even with half the reward.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
If there are less miners, difficulty decreases and thus increasing profit. It's an endless cycle.


Yes. OP do you read this?
Everything is kept in balance.
Because if your statement was the case then there must be no Bitcoin right now!
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
If there are less miners, difficulty decreases and thus increasing profit. It's an endless cycle.

Decrease at next diff. adjutment, not right away.
But there's no reason for miners to shut down right away. Mining at a loss might be worth it to drive the competition out of business. It's a Mexican standoff.

Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Clearly another moron.  Even if we only have two miners, blocks go every 10 minutes.

Clearly another moron. At current difficulty, a block would *never* be solved with just 2 miners. Blocks are solved in *about* ten minutes at current difficulty and current hashrate.  Cut the hashrate, and the time to solve a block increases proportionally. Cut it enough, and you'll never get to the next difficulty adjustment.
hero member
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Clearly another moron.  Even if we only have two miners, blocks go every 10 minutes.  We get 1 MB worth of transactions no matter how many miners.  So, halving does nothing to slow transactions.

The community is full of idiots.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087
Satoshi knew what he was doing. Mining is a finely tuned balancing act designed to sustain itself.
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 579
HODLing is an art, not just a word...
Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly

talking without any proof is easy. you can say anything you like but that doesn't make any of it true.

in this case unless you can provide any legitimate information on the costs of mining for the miners (electricity, ...) then your words are pointless. because i say miners are still earning A LOT of profit even with half the reward.
hero member
Activity: 712
Merit: 500
If there are less miners, difficulty decreases and thus increasing profit. It's an endless cycle.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Why would miners invest so much into electricity for half the reward? I see this ending badly
Pages:
Jump to: