I'm not sure why bitcointalk took down our post showing NH vs HK but they did
These are some comparisons between NH and HK
Just a few comparison of algo speeds vs nicehash
algo nh HK
neoscrypt 1.4MH/s 1.39MH/s
lyra2REv2 66.74MH/s 78.37MH/s
x11 Gost 11.38MH/s 16.2 MH/s
Blake2s 5.9GH/s 7.2GH/s
Skunk 50.91MH/s 52.3MH/s
Lyra2z 2.9MH/s 3.8MH/s
x16r 13MH/s 17MH/s
We are so much more than profit switching...with almost every GPU algorithm, we welcome you to try and also become involved in giving ideas to make this even better!
What comparison? Different miners? Everyone can use better miners than nicehash.
What I see is rather bad soft. It downloaded 1Gb+ of miners. On nvidia only rig it downloaded a bunch of useless sgminer and other amd-only miners. For what reason? Than it just hang because of hang hardware monitoring driver and didn't even gave no option not to use it.
Thanks for your comment...let me see if I can help
Yes...every one receives the same miners because we have a lot of mixed rigs out there...it's approx 800MB worth of miners. We will be putting out an option later to limit the downloads to your rigs but our main concern is getting bugs out of the system.
The hanging, I'm unsure and would be happy to help you troubleshoot to get it up and running so you can see the value of our program and then do a review.
One thing though...yes, the comparison is due to our miners...but the speeds are accurate. If you have faster miners than NH you will make more than NH. What are you saying here? That we can't claim to have faster speeds because we use different miners? But our speeds are faster, by a wide margin.
I would be more than happy to help you with any issues in our software...but if you choose not to want to work it out, that's fine also, we will inform everyone when we have a stable version. However, I've been using this with no issues and am doing very well.
Let us know if we can help.
Thanks,
James