Author

Topic: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - 1,150 TH/S HASH RATE (1GH/S per Unit) - page 170. (Read 565837 times)

hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Since Bitmine is 4 weeks late with the delivery of Rigs, CryptX should demand/press/whatever on them to put at least 3 or 4 persons on our production line and complete and deliver all our 165 rig units in a week:

It has happened that some partnering companies have payed us to have a different production line, where one fixed person stood in our production facility and made miners just for them.
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
not sure if everyone saw this. This was posted in bitmine.ch main thread a while ago over in hardware section. I would make a good guess this is our operation, hence the uptick we saw in delivery from them.

This also links back to the suggestion made about "good intention".

Hello everyone!

Time has finally come for me to make things clear about past happenings and what you can expect from bitmine in the future. First of all I owe everyone an apology being that late clarifying things but I felt that explaining anything without first setting up, on one hand, a better production line that could catch up delayed orders, and on the other hand a competent customer support staff that could answer all of your inquiries, it would not be of much use. Adding to that, my insane work schedule never let me much time for the forum and your personal inquiries. That being said I want a couple of things to be clarified:

- We never, ever, favored "bigger" customers over "little" customers. It has happened that some partnering companies have payed us to have a different production line, where one fixed person stood in our production facility and made miners just for them. This never influenced the "main" production line and it is not the cause for other orders delays.

All these talks about bots/counter bots/etc. There is a way to trick the bots to get cheaper shares, i notice some people have been doing this already. BCmine i guesstimate you have made around a 8% loss, awwwww poor you....
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.

While I'm still a beliver of Peta, I'm quite concerned about Havelock. Yes, 2FA and other security measures, but they hold quite a high number of btc in their pockets and the up&down server is not a good sign at all. I mean... what's so complex in having a static decent website and let the trading part experience these issues? I'm just afraid that they will disappear one day. Sure, Crytpx has the shareholder list with shares/name, but... not sure how to feel about Havelock.

While I have no reason to trust or not trust them, they are likely under constant ddos attack same as the rest of the larger entities in this ecosystem.
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
I belive someone is making benefits from such low price. Someone drop price specially to probably buy more, making so much noise after last announcement from Cryptyx - which wasn't bad (and contains information about already designed and ready to develop own boards)
Too bad that I don't have founds to buy I belive now is the best prices after IPO, next weeks will be own designed boards and pricess will go up I assume.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Firefox reported secure connection: High-grade Encryption (RC4, 128 bit keys).
Went back to Opera, disabled TLS v1 Security protocol (left v1.1 and v1.2), and now Opera reports secure connection: TLS v1.2 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA-256)
That's strange, wonder if Cloudflare are actively disabling vulnerable protocols.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Firefox reported secure connection: High-grade Encryption (RC4, 128 bit keys).
Went back to Opera, disabled TLS v1 Security protocol (left v1.1 and v1.2), and now Opera reports secure connection: TLS v1.2 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA-256)
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Hmm.. I checked yesterday in my browser what's the security status of a connection to havelock, and it said 'this site is not secure'? (Opera on Linux) Despite connection beeing 'https'. Has this something with them beeing behind that cloudfare?
Looks fine on Win 7 Chrome for me, its possible that your browser doesn't recognise the issuer (CA) for the certificate they are using.
Cloudflare shouldn't cause any issues with SSL if its setup correctly, which it seems to be.
Here's what I see in Chrome
https://i.imgur.com/4qD41UG.png
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Hmm.. I checked yesterday in my browser what's the security status of a connection to havelock, and it said 'this site is not secure'? (Opera on Linux) Despite connection beeing 'https'. Has this something with them beeing behind that cloudfare?
sr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 250
Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.

While I'm still a beliver of Peta, I'm quite concerned about Havelock. Yes, 2FA and other security measures, but they hold quite a high number of btc in their pockets and the up&down server is not a good sign at all. I mean... what's so complex in having a static decent website and let the trading part experience these issues? I'm just afraid that they will disappear one day. Sure, Crytpx has the shareholder list with shares/name, but... not sure how to feel about Havelock.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Havelock is down a lot, but that is not something that is 'recent'. Havelock has server problems for quite some time now.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
Well hello there!
Is it just me or does it seem like havelock is down alot recently?
legendary
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Just wondering why there's still over 1000 Gh/s @ Eligius (128 seconds 1,874.12 Gh/s)?  Huh

Probably to keep the queue to withdraw 41 btc..... If i haven't misunderstood the eligius payament system...

I believe if you stop mining altogether you will get a payout after 7 days no matter how small, so yes, it is likely to keep us in the queue so we get paid sooner than later.
legendary
Activity: 1057
Merit: 1009
Just wondering why there's still over 1000 Gh/s @ Eligius (128 seconds 1,874.12 Gh/s)?  Huh

Probably to keep the queue to withdraw 41 btc..... If i haven't misunderstood the eligius payament system...
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
Just wondering why there's still over 1000 Gh/s @ Eligius (128 seconds 1,874.12 Gh/s)?  Huh
copper member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Finally found that bcmine user has his own thread, and is running his own portfolio with a fund at cryptostocks. No wonder he is here, spreading FUD on competition...

Yea. And he runs a bot. comes here, chats shit, creates volatility, bot orders gets filled.

Fucking hate that useless peice of shit

I'd say with almost 100% certainty he is going to run away with their money, so I've made it my personal mission everytime he comes here to inform his shareholders of how intelligent he actually is, and how much of a sham his 'project' is

Fucking asshole. People like that are so lucky they have the Internet to hide behind
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Finally found that bcmine user has his own thread, and is running his own portfolio with a fund at cryptostocks. No wonder he is here, spreading FUD on competition...
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
great job getting the dragon miners!
full member
Activity: 237
Merit: 100
Please continue effort, really liking hour style.
member
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
I think there is something fishy going on at Bitmine, I don't know what kind of a deal Cryptx have with Bitmine regarding the delayed Hardware and if there will be compensation and how much it will be.

   but something is wrong at Bitmine and I don't know what the exact story is, they are not speaking and they are taking the easy way of things, I also find the way they've changed their attitude toward customers (now they are being all sweet and nice) really suspicious, although the timing is kind of funny, now that most people didn't receive their hardware, they  are entitled to a refund based on the TOS agreed on at the purchase. (60 days delay equal a refund + 10% penalty) for those who paid with BTC back at November/December it makes perfect sense to ask for a refund, you would get more BTC than you paid, these machines wouldn't ROI anyways. so there is that.

 I just find it really strange that Chinese copies of the based A1 chip rigs are going on a really worrying rate (not to mention the price) while Bitmine fails to deliver the simplest orders and fail to even have a working Rig design.


I think this is why the share price is going down, people are are afraid about the worst scenario, it is humans being humans, usually the price would go back when there is a clear picture of the situation (or drop forward if the news is bad).



Cryptx probably make their profit from the hosting fees so adding more machines is better for them than getting the refund for us. We should get extra machines as compensation though.

I hope all this FUD stays around for a while, I want to pick up more shares while they're cheap Smiley Only managed to buy 5 this week.
hero member
Activity: 617
Merit: 509
Crypto Card - https://platinum.crypto.com/r/28cz7d
So this is very clear, people with brains playing tricks on people without confidence. Like,  saying that this share is going down or  i am selling of,  or  selling 100 at price 0.055 and then placing  buying orders at price 0.05... So all the kids get scared and sell all their 10 shares they have. Since the liquidity is low, the sudden drop occur.

Some people publish analysis pulled out of the hat and yet I am siting here with my popcorn and enjoying this forum!
Jump to: